Literature DB >> 23063107

At which surface roughness do claws cling? Investigations with larvae of the running water mayfly Epeorus assimilis (Heptageniidae, Ephemeroptera).

Petra Ditsche-Kuru1, Wilhelm Barthlott, Jochen H E Koop.   

Abstract

Tarsal claws, which are common attachment devices in arthropods, interlock with the surface irregularities of the substrata. Most insects have two tarsal claws, but the larvae of some aquatic insects, such as Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera, bear only one claw on their tarsi. The range of surface roughness that is sufficient for the function of the single claws of aquatic invertebrates has not yet been investigated. In the present study, we investigated the surface texture required for the function of the claws of larvae of the mayfly, Epeorus assimilis. We conducted attachment experiments using replications with defined surface roughness, white light profilometry, videotaping and scanning electron microscopy. The results demonstrate that the choice of an appropriate roughness order is very important. A setting resulting in a cut-off length of approximately thirty times the diameter of the claw tip proved most appropriate for describing the roughness order that is relevant for the functioning of the claws of E. assimilis larvae. Common technical roughness parameters such as R(a), R(q) or R(z) supplied sufficient differentiation between the tested substrata. E. assimilis larvae require a minimum surface roughness (R(a)∼6.0μm) for their claws to grip. At lesser surface roughness, the larvae left the substratum. This was surprising because E. assimilis larvae have been observed to attach even to smooth surfaces. Based on the use of sterile substrata in this experiment, we assume that coverage with biofilm considerably influences the attachment of the larvae.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23063107     DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2011.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoology (Jena)        ISSN: 0944-2006            Impact factor:   2.240


  7 in total

1.  More than just slippery: the impact of biofilm on the attachment of non-sessile freshwater mayfly larvae.

Authors:  Petra Ditsche; Jan Michels; Alexander Kovalev; Jochen Koop; Stanislav Gorb
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  From smooth to rough, from water to air: the intertidal habitat of Northern clingfish (Gobiesox maeandricus).

Authors:  Petra Ditsche; Madeline Hicks; Lisa Truong; Christina Linkem; Adam Summers
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-03-24

Review 3.  Aquatic versus terrestrial attachment: Water makes a difference.

Authors:  Petra Ditsche; Adam P Summers
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  A Review of Natural Joint Systems and Numerical Investigation of Bio-Inspired GFRP-to-Steel Joints.

Authors:  Evangelos I Avgoulas; Michael P F Sutcliffe
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  The synergy between the insect-inspired claws and adhesive pads increases the attachment ability on various rough surfaces.

Authors:  Yi Song; Zhendong Dai; Zhouyi Wang; Aihong Ji; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Hydraulic stress parameters of a cased caddis larva (Drusus biguttatus) using spatio-temporally filtered velocity measurements.

Authors:  Johann Waringer; Simon Vitecek; Jan Martini; Carina Zittra; Stephan Handschuh; Ariane Vieira; Hendrik C Kuhlmann
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Scaling of claw sharpness: mechanical constraints reduce attachment performance in larger insects.

Authors:  Jonathan G Pattrick; David Labonte; Walter Federle
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.312

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.