Literature DB >> 23348774

On the relationship between ontogenetic and static allometry.

Christophe Pélabon1, Geir H Bolstad, Camilla K Egset, James M Cheverud, Mihaela Pavlicev, Gunilla Rosenqvist.   

Abstract

Ontogenetic and static allometries describe how a character changes in size when the size of the organism changes during ontogeny and among individuals measured at the same developmental stage, respectively. Understanding the relationship between these two types of allometry is crucial to understanding the evolution of allometry and, more generally, the evolution of shape. However, the effects of ontogenetic allometry on static allometry remain largely unexplored. Here, we first show analytically how individual variation in ontogenetic allometry and body size affect static allometry. Using two longitudinal data sets on ontogenetic and static allometry, we then estimate variances and covariances for the different parameters of the ontogenetic allometry defined in our model and assess their relative contribution to the static allometric slope. The mean ontogenetic allometry is the main parameter that determines the static allometric slope, while the covariance between the ontogenetic allometric slope and body size generates most of the discrepancies between ontogenetic and static allometry. These results suggest that the apparent evolutionary stasis of the static allometric slope is not generated by internal (developmental) constraints but more likely results from external constraints imposed by selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23348774     DOI: 10.1086/668820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  21 in total

1.  Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Geir H Bolstad; Jason A Cassara; Eladio Márquez; Thomas F Hansen; Kim van der Linde; David Houle; Christophe Pélabon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evolvability and nonevolvability of allometric slopes.

Authors:  Jon F Harrison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Why does offspring size affect performance? Integrating metabolic scaling with life-history theory.

Authors:  Amanda K Pettersen; Craig R White; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Effect of genomic deficiencies on sexual size dimorphism through modification of developmental time in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K H Takahashi; W U Blanckenhorn
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  The longer the better: evidence that narwhal tusks are sexually selected.

Authors:  Zackary A Graham; Eva Garde; Mads Peter Heide-Jørgensen; Alexandre V Palaoro
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  What constrains adaptive radiation? Documentation and explanation of under-evolved morphologies in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Steven Poe; Lorenzo A H Donald; Christopher Anderson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.530

8.  On reconstructing Giraffa sivalensis, an extinct giraffid from the Siwalik Hills, India.

Authors:  Sybrand J van Sittert; Graham Mitchell
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Selection on skewed characters and the paradox of stasis.

Authors:  Suzanne Bonamour; Céline Teplitsky; Anne Charmantier; Pierre-André Crochet; Luis-Miguel Chevin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Scaling of claw sharpness: mechanical constraints reduce attachment performance in larger insects.

Authors:  Jonathan G Pattrick; David Labonte; Walter Federle
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.