Literature DB >> 22404434

Artificial selection on allometry: change in elevation but not slope.

C K Egset1, T F Hansen, A LE Rouzic, G H Bolstad, G Rosenqvist, C Pélabon.   

Abstract

To what extent within-species (static) allometries constitute a constraint on evolution is the subject of a long-standing debate in evolutionary biology. A prerequisite for the constraint hypothesis is that static allometries are hard to change. Several studies have attempted to test this hypothesis with artificial-selection experiments, but their results remain inconclusive due to various methodological issues. Here, we present results from an experiment in which we selected independently on the slope and the elevation of the allometric relationship between caudal-fin size and body size in male guppies (Poecilia reticulata). After three episodes of selection, the allometric elevation (i.e. intercept at constant slope) had diverged markedly between the lines selected to increase or decrease it, and showed a realized heritability of 50%. In contrast, the allometric slope remained unaffected by selection. These results suggest that the allometric elevation is more evolvable than the allometric slope, this latter representing a potential constraint on adaptive trait evolution. To our knowledge, this study is the first artificial-selection experiment that directly tests the evolvability of static allometric slopes.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2012 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22404434     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02487.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  22 in total

1.  Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Geir H Bolstad; Jason A Cassara; Eladio Márquez; Thomas F Hansen; Kim van der Linde; David Houle; Christophe Pélabon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  The static allometry of sexual and non-sexual traits in vervet monkeys.

Authors:  Rafael L Rodríguez; Jennifer Danzy Cramer; Christopher A Schmitt; Tegan J Gaetano; J Paul Grobler; Nelson B Freimer; Trudy R Turner
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.138

4.  Shear-sensitive adhesion enables size-independent adhesive performance in stick insects.

Authors:  David Labonte; Marie-Yon Struecker; Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery; Walter Federle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Comparative response to drought in primitive and modern wheat: a cue on domestication.

Authors:  Guang-Chao Lv; Zheng-Guo Cheng; Feng-Min Li; Nudrat Aisha Akram; You-Cai Xiong
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Extreme positive allometry of animal adhesive pads and the size limits of adhesion-based climbing.

Authors:  David Labonte; Christofer J Clemente; Alex Dittrich; Chi-Yun Kuo; Alfred J Crosby; Duncan J Irschick; Walter Federle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  How populations differentiate despite gene flow: sexual and natural selection drive phenotypic divergence within a land fish, the Pacific leaping blenny.

Authors:  Courtney L Morgans; Georgina M Cooke; Terry J Ord
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Fitness consequences of artificial selection on relative male genital size.

Authors:  Isobel Booksmythe; Megan L Head; J Scott Keogh; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Specialized specialists and the narrow niche fallacy: a tale of scale-feeding fishes.

Authors:  Matthew A Kolmann; Jonathan M Huie; Kory Evans; Adam P Summers
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Scaling of claw sharpness: mechanical constraints reduce attachment performance in larger insects.

Authors:  Jonathan G Pattrick; David Labonte; Walter Federle
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.