Literature DB >> 32292189

A Review of Strategies for Enhancing Clarity and Reader Accessibility of Qualitative Research Results.

Teresa A O'Sullivan1, Curtis G Jefferson1.   

Abstract

Objective. To characterize elements of the results section of qualitative research reports that make findings more accessible to readers. Methods. Two analytical methods were used for this review. First, published reviews and textbooks written by experts outlining how to evaluate qualitative research were retrieved and reviewed to identify common elements that enhance clarity of the results section. In the second analysis, the authors analyzed the results sections of a subset of qualitative studies to identify, from a reader's point of view, aspects that enhanced and detracted from communication of the results. Findings. Four elements improve accessibility of the results section for readers of qualitative research reports. Content, the first element, describes what information the reader should look for in the results section. Style of results, the second element, identifies wording choices that improve reader accessibility and understanding. Narrative flow, the third element, describes a results section that flows smoothly and logically. Structural cohesiveness, the final element, outlines effective organization of the results section. Results. While authors take several approaches to the presentation of results in qualitative research reports, some strategies appear to be more common and effective than others. The efficient presentation of results can impact a reader's assessment of the quality and credibility of a study. Identified content and stylistic elements should be considered by authors hoping to make the results of their qualitative research more accessible and comprehensible to readers.
© 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.

Keywords:  medical writing; qualitative research; research papers

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32292189      PMCID: PMC7055402          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  74 in total

1.  Making the transition from pharmacy student to pharmacist: Australian interns' perceptions of professional identity formation.

Authors:  Christy Noble; Ian Coombes; Lisa Nissen; Paul N Shaw; Alexandra Clavarino
Journal:  Int J Pharm Pract       Date:  2014-11-02

2.  Presenting and evaluating qualitative research.

Authors:  Claire Anderson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Making words count: the value of qualitative research.

Authors:  Ros Johnson; Jackie Waterfield
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2004

4.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Measuring professional identity formation early in medical school.

Authors:  Adina Kalet; Lynn Buckvar-Keltz; Victoria Harnik; Verna Monson; Steven Hubbard; Ruth Crowe; Hyuksoon S Song; Sandra Yingling
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Focusing on the Fundamentals: Reading Qualitative Research with a Critical Eye.

Authors:  Kim Schafer Astroth
Journal:  Nephrol Nurs J       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.959

7.  Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.

Authors:  Bridget C O'Brien; Ilene B Harris; Thomas J Beckman; Darcy A Reed; David A Cook
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Reconciling professional identity: A grounded theory of nurse academics' role modelling for undergraduate students.

Authors:  A Baldwin; J Mills; M Birks; L Budden
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Stressful episodes reported by first-year student nurses: a descriptive account.

Authors:  K R Parkes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Social workers' attributions towards individuals with dual diagnosis of intellectual disability and mental illness.

Authors:  T Araten-Bergman; S Werner
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2016-06-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Use of research evidence varied in efforts to expand specific pharmacist autonomous prescriptive authority: an evaluation and recommendations to increase research utilization.

Authors:  Akshara Kumar; Amber Bivins Ray; Carrie Blanchard
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-01-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.