Literature DB >> 30349974

Predictors of spontaneous ureteral stone passage in the presence of an indwelling ureteral stent.

Joseph M Kuebker1, Jennifer Robles2, Jordan J Kramer2, Nicole L Miller2, S Duke Herrell2, Ryan S Hsi2.   

Abstract

Patients presenting acutely with obstructing stones often have a ureteral stent placed as a temporizing solution. Ureteroscopy is then commonly performed in a staged fashion, but occasionally the stone is found to have passed. We aimed to identify the frequency and predictors of ureteral stone passage with a stent in place. Records were reviewed to identify patients who had a stent placed for a single ureteral stone. Subsequent ureteroscopy or CT scan was used to ascertain stone passage. Effect of age, gender, BMI, stone diameter, alpha blocker use, urinary tract infection, hydronephrosis, and stent duration on stone passage was assessed. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were met in 209 patients. Mean maximum stone diameter was 6.5 ± 2.5 mm. Passage rates for stones < 3 mm, 3-4.9 mm, 5-6.9 mm, and ≥ 7 mm were 50%, 13%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. The overall rate of passage was 8%. Stone passage was associated with smaller maximum stone diameter, more distal stone location, and longer duration of stent before ureteroscopy/CT on univariate analysis (p < 0.01). Stone diameter and stent duration remained significantly associated on multivariable analysis (p = 0.001 and p = 0.05, respectively). Our findings suggest ureteral stone passage with a concurrent ureteral stent is not a rare event as it occurred in 14% of stones less then 7 mm in maximum diameter. Stone size and duration of stent before ureteroscopy or CT were found to be independent predictors of passage. Select patients with small ureteral stones who have been stented should be considered for a trial of urine straining or repeat imaging before subsequent ureteroscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nephrolithiasis; Ureteral stents; Ureteral stones

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30349974     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-018-1080-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  13 in total

Review 1.  EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Defining the Rate of Negative Ureteroscopy in the General Population Treated for Upper Tract Urinary Stone Disease.

Authors:  Remy W Lamberts; Simon L Conti; John T Leppert; Christopher S Elliott
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Predictors for negative ureteroscopy in the management of upper urinary tract stone disease.

Authors:  Jessica E Kreshover; Rian J Dickstein; Courtney Rowe; Richard K Babayan; David S Wang
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II.

Authors:  Dean Assimos; Amy Krambeck; Nicole L Miller; Manoj Monga; M Hassan Murad; Caleb P Nelson; Kenneth T Pace; Vernon M Pais; Margaret S Pearle; Glenn M Preminger; Hassan Razvi; Ojas Shah; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Computed tomography versus ureteroscopy in identification of renal tract stone with ureteral stent in situ.

Authors:  V C Y Tang; A Attwell-Heap
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  The difficult ureter: what is the incidence of pre-stenting?

Authors:  R J Cetti; S Biers; S R Keoghane
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  A prospective trial on ureteral stenting combined with secondary ureteroscopy after an initial failed procedure.

Authors:  Changwei Ji; Weidong Gan; Hongqian Guo; Huibo Lian; Shiwei Zhang; Rong Yang; Xiaozhi Zhao
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-04-12

8.  Characterization of ureteral stents by dual-energy computed tomography: Clinical implications.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim; William E Haley; Maria A Jepperson; Michael J Wehle; Joseph G Cernigliaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

9.  Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteric and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study.

Authors:  Dean Assimos; Alfonso Crisci; Daniel Culkin; Wei Xue; Anita Roelofs; Mordechai Duvdevani; Mahesh Desai; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment.

Authors:  Pat Fox Fulgham; Dean G Assimos; Margaret Sue Pearle; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  CT-related parameters and Framingham score as predictors of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm: results from a prospective, observational, multicenter study.

Authors:  Ismail Selvi; Numan Baydilli; Turgut Tursem Tokmak; Emre Can Akinsal; Halil Basar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Reducing the rate of negative ureteroscopy: predictive factors and the role of preoperative imaging.

Authors:  A C Brodie; T J Johnston; P Lloyd; L Hemsworth; M Barabas; S R Keoghane
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 1.951

3.  Histological Inflammation in Human Ureter either Healthy or Fitted with Double-Pigtail Stent or a Thin 0.3 F Suture Thread: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Benoît Vogt; Ilham Chokri
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2020-07-02

4.  The identification of pregnant women with renal colic who may need surgical intervention.

Authors:  Maomao He; Xiaoting Lin; Ming Lei; Xiaolan Xu; Zhihui He
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Long surgical waiting list times are associated with an increased rate of negative ureteroscopies.

Authors:  Daniel A González-Padilla; Alejandro González-Díaz; Helena Peña-Vallejo; Rocío Santos Pérez de la Blanca; Julio Teigell-Tobar; Mario Hernández-Arroyo; Pablo Abad-López; Alfredo Rodriguez-Antolin; Fernando Cabrera-Meiras
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.