Literature DB >> 34171212

Long surgical waiting list times are associated with an increased rate of negative ureteroscopies.

Daniel A González-Padilla1, Alejandro González-Díaz2, Helena Peña-Vallejo2, Rocío Santos Pérez de la Blanca2, Julio Teigell-Tobar2, Mario Hernández-Arroyo2, Pablo Abad-López2, Alfredo Rodriguez-Antolin2, Fernando Cabrera-Meiras2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Negative ureteroscopy (NURS) is "a ureteroscopy in which no stone is found during the procedure." We aimed to determine the association between the surgical waiting list time (WLT) and the NURS rate.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients scheduled for ureteroscopy in our center between January 2017 and July 2019. The inclusion criterion was unilateral, semirigid ureteroscopy for a single ureteral stone; exclusion criteria were renal-only stones, incomplete ureteroscopy, and stones >10 mm. We analyzed age; gender; body mass index; stone size, density, and location; presence of a temporary double-J (DJ) stent; use of medical expulsive therapy; and WLT. Complications while waiting for surgery were also collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: We included 219 patients, 41 (18.7%) of whom had NURS. The median WLT was 74 days (interquartile range [IQR] 45-127). Variables protective against NURS were large stone size (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.93), presence of a temporary DJ stent (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.2-0.8), and radiopaque stones (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.88). A long WLT ((≥60 days) increased the risk of NURS (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02-4.61). Complications requiring emergency department visits while waiting for surgery were documented in 58/137 (42.3%) patients with indwelling DJ stents; nonetheless, a WLT greater than the median was not associated with an increased risk of complications (p=0.38).
CONCLUSIONS: Long WLT has an independent, direct, and linear correlation with NURS rates. Patients at higher risk of NURS, may be offered preoperative re-evaluation with a computed tomography scan in a resource-limited setting.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34171212      PMCID: PMC8631839          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  19 in total

Review 1.  Surgical anatomy of the ureter.

Authors:  Rosemarie Fröber
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Defining the Rate of Negative Ureteroscopy in the General Population Treated for Upper Tract Urinary Stone Disease.

Authors:  Remy W Lamberts; Simon L Conti; John T Leppert; Christopher S Elliott
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Ultrasonography Can Replace CT Scans as the Initial Imaging Examination of Ureteral Calculi.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Jixiang Wu; Shan Chen; Yuexin Liu; Guangyin Zhang; Hao Ping; Ludong Qiao; Yupeng Zheng; Wei Wang
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Predictors and Results of Negative Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Consecutive Ureteric Stones Done as a Primary Procedure: Prospective Outcomes from a University Hospital.

Authors:  Sarah Prattley; Patrick Rice; Amelia Pietropaolo; Robert Geraghty; Omikunle Babawale; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  "Stoneless" or Negative Ureteroscopy: A Reality in the Endourologic Routine or Avoidable Source of Frustration? Estimating the Risk Factors for a Negative Ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Ioannis Katafigiotis; Itay M Sabler; Eliyahu M Heifetz; Avi Rosenfeld; Sfoungaristos Stavros; Amitay Lorber; Arie Latke; Vladimir Yutkin; Guy Hidas; Ezekiel H Landau; Dov Pode; Ofer N Gofrit; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Natural History of Conservatively Managed Ureteral Stones: Analysis of 6600 Patients.

Authors:  Sachin Yallappa; Tarik Amer; Patrick Jones; Francesco Greco; Thomas Tailly; Bhaskar K Somani; Nkem Umez-Eronini; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients.

Authors:  Jean de la Rosette; John Denstedt; Petrisor Geavlete; Francis Keeley; Tadashi Matsuda; Margaret Pearle; Glenn Preminger; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 8.  Imaging for urolithiasis: standards, trends, and radiation exposure.

Authors:  Michael Lipkin; Anika Ackerman
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.309

9.  Plain abdominal radiography with transabdominal native tissue harmonic imaging ultrasonography vs unenhanced computed tomography in renal colic.

Authors:  Michael Mitterberger; Germar Michael Pinggera; Leo Pallwein; Johannes Gradl; Gudrun Feuchtner; Raffael Plattner; Richard Neururer; Georg Bartsch; Hannes Strasser; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of uric acid urolithiasis: A narrative review.

Authors:  A Abou-Elela
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 10.479

View more
  1 in total

1.  This stone (may?) too shall pass.

Authors:  Jennifer Bjazevic
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.