Literature DB >> 22491753

A prospective trial on ureteral stenting combined with secondary ureteroscopy after an initial failed procedure.

Changwei Ji1, Weidong Gan, Hongqian Guo, Huibo Lian, Shiwei Zhang, Rong Yang, Xiaozhi Zhao.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the intentional ureteral stenting on the success rate of calculus extraction by second ureteroscopy, when the initial ureteroscopy failed. We prospectively enrolled 512 patients with ureteral calculi who underwent ureteroscopies from April 2005 to May 2011. The patients with failed initial ureteroscopies were classified into two groups depending on the stent type: the Double-J stent and the ureteral catheter group. The secondary ureteroscopies were performed in a short period (3-22 days). Data were abstracted on stone size, location, patient demographics, outcome and complications. A total of 453 patients had success after the initial ureteroscopy and the success rate was 88.5%. Of the 59 failed patients, 40 were managed by reureteroscopy with Double-J stent placement and 19 with ureteral catheters. There were no statistically significant differences between patients in Double-J stent and ureteral catheter group in the aspects of age, primary stone size, gender, stone location and stone-free rate [39/40 (97.5%) versus 19/19 (100%), p > 0.05]. Moreover, the mean stents retaining period before the second ureteroscopy was significantly shorter in the ureteral catheter group, when compared with the Double-J stent group (3.9 versus 16.9 days, p < 0.01). The complications were moderate and not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). Indwelling a ureteral stent leads to a high subsequent success rate for second ureteroscopy following an initial failed procedure. In addition to Double-J stent, the ureteral catheter stent was an effective alternative with shorter retaining period, especially for impacted stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22491753     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-012-0476-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  18 in total

1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  R Peschel; G Janetschek; G Bartsch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Evaluation of materials used as ureteral splints.

Authors:  W M DRAKE; J CARROLL; F BARTONE; R N COTTONE; H L KAZAL; S SUMERAI; T R FETTER
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1962-01

3.  A scored form of the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: data from a randomized controlled trial of surgery for women with stress incontinence.

Authors:  Sara T Brookes; Jenny L Donovan; Melissa Wright; Simon Jackson; Paul Abrams
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Preoperative stent placement decreases cost of ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Lei Chu; Coreen A Farris; Anthony T Corcoran; Timothy D Averch
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The effects of acute and chronic JJ stent placement on upper urinary tract motility and calculus transit.

Authors:  P C Ryan; G M Lennon; P A McLean; J M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1994-10

6.  Secondary ureteroscopy: results and management strategy at a referral center.

Authors:  R K Singal; H A Razvi; J D Denstedt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones?

Authors:  Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Mert Ali Karadag; Ahmet Hamdi Tefekli; Fatih Altunrende; Adem Tok; Yalcin Berberoglu
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.369

8.  Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis.

Authors:  John M Shields; Vincent G Bird; Reid Graves; Orlando Gómez-Marín
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: factors associated with intraoperative adverse events.

Authors:  Ahmed F Abdelrahim; Abulfotouh Abdelmaguid; Hamdi Abuzeid; Moamen Amin; El-Sayed Mousa; Fahim Abdelrahim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 10.  Management of ureteric stones.

Authors:  Theodore Anagnostou; David Tolley
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  6 in total

1.  The double wire technique: an alternative method for difficult ureteroscopic access.

Authors:  Yakup Bostanci; Ender Ozden; Fatih Atac; Yarkin Kamil Yakupoglu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-07-04

2.  [Uretero(reno)scopy: management of complications].

Authors:  T Knoll; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Predictors of spontaneous ureteral stone passage in the presence of an indwelling ureteral stent.

Authors:  Joseph M Kuebker; Jennifer Robles; Jordan J Kramer; Nicole L Miller; S Duke Herrell; Ryan S Hsi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Success rate of repeat flexible ureteroscopy following previous failed access: An analysis of stent duration.

Authors:  Dylan T Hoare; Timothy A Wollin; Shubha De; Michael G Hobart
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Is the 4.5-F ureteroscope (Ultra-Thin) an alternative in the management of ureteric and renal pelvic stones?

Authors:  Hakkı Uzun; Nezih Akça
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-06-21

6.  Different failure rates of insertion of 10/12-Fr ureteral access sheaths during retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with and without stones.

Authors:  Yuma Waseda; Ryoji Takazawa; Masaki Kobayashi; Honoka Fuse; Takashi Tamiya
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.