Literature DB >> 30347035

Deformation of Transvaginal Mesh in Response to Multiaxial Loading.

William R Barone1, Katrina M Knight2, Pamela A Moalli3, Steven D Abramowitch4.   

Abstract

Synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair is associated with high complication rates. While current devices incorporate large pores (>1 mm), recent studies have shown that uniaxial loading of mesh reduces pore size, raising the risk for complications. However, it is difficult to translate uniaxial results to transvaginal meshes, as in vivo loading is multidirectional. Thus, the aim of this study was to (1) experimentally characterize deformation of pore diameters in a transvaginal mesh in response to clinically relevant multidirectional loading and (2) develop a computational model to simulate mesh behavior in response to in vivo loading conditions. Tension (2.5 N) was applied to each of mesh arm to simulate surgical implantation. Two loading conditions were assessed where the angle of the applied tension was altered and image analysis was used to quantify changes in pore dimensions. A computational model was developed and used to simulate pore behavior in response to these same loading conditions and the results were compared to experimental findings. For both conditions, between 26.4% and 56.6% of all pores were found to have diameters <1 mm. Significant reductions in pore diameter were noted in the inferior arms and between the two superior arms. The computational model identified the same regions, though the model generally underestimated pore deformation. This study demonstrates that multiaxial loading applied clinically has the potential to locally reduce porosity in transvaginal mesh, increasing the risk for complications. Computational simulations show potential of predicting this behavior for more complex loading conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30347035      PMCID: PMC6298528          DOI: 10.1115/1.4041743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  16 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical properties of synthetic implants used in the repair of prolapse and urinary incontinence in women: which is the ideal material?

Authors:  Michel Cosson; Philippe Debodinance; Malik Boukerrou; M P Chauvet; Pierre Lobry; Gilles Crépin; Anne Ego
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-07-25

Review 2.  Biologic grafts and synthetic meshes in pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Chi Chiung Grace Chen; Beri Ridgeway; Marie Fidela R Paraiso
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Modeling individual-specific human optic nerve head biomechanics. Part II: influence of material properties.

Authors:  Ian A Sigal; John G Flanagan; Inka Tertinegg; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2008-02-27

4.  Biomechanical properties of raw meshes used in pelvic floor reconstruction.

Authors:  Hannah Krause; Michael Bennett; Mark Forwood; Judith Goh
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-09-02

Review 5.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Finite element predictions of cartilage contact mechanics in hips with retroverted acetabula.

Authors:  C R Henak; E D Carruth; A E Anderson; M D Harris; B J Ellis; C L Peters; J A Weiss
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects. Experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  F H Greca; J B de Paula; M L Biondo-Simões; F D da Costa; A P da Silva; S Time; A Mansur
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness.

Authors:  R Liang; S Abramowitch; K Knight; S Palcsey; A Nolfi; A Feola; S Stein; P A Moalli
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Textile properties of synthetic prolapse mesh in response to uniaxial loading.

Authors:  William R Barone; Pamela A Moalli; Steven D Abramowitch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Modified classification of surgical meshes for hernia repair based on the analyses of 1,000 explanted meshes.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mesh deformation: A mechanism underlying polypropylene prolapse mesh complications in vivo.

Authors:  Katrina M Knight; Gabrielle E King; Stacy L Palcsey; Amanda Suda; Rui Liang; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 10.633

2.  Surgical treatment of advanced anterior wall and apical vaginal prolapse using the anchorless self-retaining support implant: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Gil Levy; Anna Padoa; Naama Marcus; Anat Beck; Zoltan Fekete; Mauro Cervigni
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 1.932

3.  T regulatory cells and TGF-β1: Predictors of the host response in mesh complications.

Authors:  Amanda M Artsen; Rui Liang; Leslie Meyn; Matthew Rytel; Stacy Palcsey; Steven D Abramowitch; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 8.947

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.