Literature DB >> 17513926

Biologic grafts and synthetic meshes in pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Chi Chiung Grace Chen1, Beri Ridgeway, Marie Fidela R Paraiso.   

Abstract

Despite the lack of evidence, augmenting pelvic organ prolapse surgery with biologic graft or synthetic mesh is increasing. The objective of this review is to examine the available grafts and meshes and discuss the current data addressing the use of these implants in correction of apical, anterior, and posterior prolapse. Most of the studies are retrospective with few randomized controlled trials. There is level I evidence suggesting that repair of apical prolapse with abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh results in improved outcomes. However, most of the data concerning graft or mesh incorporation in anterior or posterior repairs do not support augmentation with prosthesis.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17513926     DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804b184c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  17 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of current biologic meshes in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Ashley Cox; Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Review of synthetic mesh-related complications in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Abdulmalik Bako; Ruchika Dhar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-09-09

3.  Complex rectovaginal fistula repair with non-cross-linked porcine graft augmentation.

Authors:  Shazia A Malik; Daniel E Stone; Bojan L Malmin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Deformation of Transvaginal Mesh in Response to Multiaxial Loading.

Authors:  William R Barone; Katrina M Knight; Pamela A Moalli; Steven D Abramowitch
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  An appraisal of the Food and Drug Administration warning on urogynecologic surgical mesh.

Authors:  Lindsey C Menchen; Alan J Wein; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Surgical perspectives regarding application of biomaterials for the management of large congenital diaphragmatic hernia defects.

Authors:  Amulya K Saxena
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction to porcine acellular dermal matrix masquerading as infection resulting in multiple debridements.

Authors:  P Vedak; J St John; A Watson; L Garibyan; M C Mihm; R M Nazarian; P C Levins; C L Cetrulo; P Schalock; D Kroshinsky
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Tissue response to a new type of biomaterial implanted subcutaneously in rats.

Authors:  Marie Boennelycke; Lise Christensen; Lene Feldskov Nielsen; Hanne Everland; Gunnar Lose
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Tensile properties of commonly used prolapse meshes.

Authors:  Keisha A Jones; Andrew Feola; Leslie Meyn; Steven D Abramowitch; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-28

10.  Varying degrees of nonlinear mechanical behavior arising from geometric differences of urogynecological meshes.

Authors:  Andrew Feola; Siladitya Pal; Pamela Moalli; Spandan Maiti; Steven Abramowitch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.