Literature DB >> 23792188

Finite element predictions of cartilage contact mechanics in hips with retroverted acetabula.

C R Henak1, E D Carruth, A E Anderson, M D Harris, B J Ellis, C L Peters, J A Weiss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A contributory factor to hip osteoarthritis (OA) is abnormal cartilage mechanics. Acetabular retroversion, a version deformity of the acetabulum, has been postulated to cause OA via decreased posterior contact area and increased posterior contact stress. Although cartilage mechanics cannot be measured directly in vivo to evaluate the causes of OA, they can be predicted using finite element (FE) modeling.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare cartilage contact mechanics between hips with normal and retroverted acetabula using subject-specific FE modeling.
METHODS: Twenty subjects were recruited and imaged: 10 with normal acetabula and 10 with retroverted acetabula. FE models were constructed using a validated protocol. Walking, stair ascent, stair descent and rising from a chair were simulated. Acetabular cartilage contact stress and contact area were compared between groups.
RESULTS: Retroverted acetabula had superomedial cartilage contact patterns, while normal acetabula had widely distributed cartilage contact patterns. In the posterolateral acetabulum, average contact stress and contact area during walking and stair descent were 2.6-7.6 times larger in normal than retroverted acetabula (P ≤ 0.017). Conversely, in the superomedial acetabulum, peak contact stress during walking was 1.2-1.6 times larger in retroverted than normal acetabula (P ≤ 0.044). Further differences varied by region and activity.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated superomedial contact patterns in retroverted acetabula vs widely distributed contact patterns in normal acetabula. Smaller posterolateral contact stress in retroverted acetabula than in normal acetabula suggests that increased posterior contact stress alone may not be the link between retroversion and OA.
Copyright © 2013 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular retroversion; Cartilage mechanics; Finite element; Hip; Osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23792188      PMCID: PMC3779536          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  44 in total

1.  The relationship between acetabular retroversion and osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  W Y Kim; C E Hutchinson; J G Andrew; P D Allen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

2.  Physical validation of a patient-specific contact finite element model of the ankle.

Authors:  Donald D Anderson; Jane K Goldsworthy; Wendy Li; M James Rudert; Yuki Tochigi; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Role of the acetabular labrum in load support across the hip joint.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Benjamin J Ellis; Michael D Harris; Andrew E Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The effects of impingement and dysplasia on stress distributions in the hip joint during sitting and walking: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Salman Chegini; Martin Beck; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Finite element prediction of cartilage contact stresses in normal human hips.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Andrew E Anderson; Corinne R Henak; Benjamin J Ellis; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip.

Authors:  Masamitsu Ezoe; Masatoshi Naito; Toshio Inoue
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage.

Authors:  K A Athanasiou; A Agarwal; F J Dzida
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Baseline articular contact stress levels predict incident symptomatic knee osteoarthritis development in the MOST cohort.

Authors:  Neil A Segal; Donald D Anderson; Krishna S Iyer; Jennifer Baker; James C Torner; John A Lynch; David T Felson; Cora E Lewis; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Correlation between radiographic measures of acetabular morphology with 3D femoral head coverage in patients with acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Benjamin J Hansen; Michael D Harris; Lucas A Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  12 in total

1.  Deformation of Transvaginal Mesh in Response to Multiaxial Loading.

Authors:  William R Barone; Katrina M Knight; Pamela A Moalli; Steven D Abramowitch
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Changes in chondrolabral mechanics, coverage, and congruency following peri-acetabular osteotomy for treatment of acetabular retroversion: A patient-specific finite element study.

Authors:  Spencer J Knight; Christine L Abraham; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Toward patient-specific articular contact mechanics.

Authors:  Gerard A Ateshian; Corinne R Henak; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Finite element prediction of transchondral stress and strain in the human hip.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  A systematic approach to predicting the risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision.

Authors:  G Zhang; B P Smith; J F Plate; R Casanova; F-C Hsu; J Li; L Xia; K C Li; G G Poehling; X Zhou
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Novel model for the induction of postnatal murine hip deformity.

Authors:  Megan L Killian; Ryan C Locke; Michael G James; Penny R Atkins; Andrew E Anderson; John C Clohisy
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Bony morphology of the hip in professional ballet dancers compared to athletes.

Authors:  Susan Mayes; April-Rose Ferris; Peter Smith; Andrew Garnham; Jill Cook
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Computed tomography arthrography with traction in the human hip for three-dimensional reconstruction of cartilage and the acetabular labrum.

Authors:  C R Henak; C L Abraham; C L Peters; R K Sanders; J A Weiss; A E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Investigation of association between hip morphology and prevalence of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Wei-Nan Zeng; Fu-You Wang; Cheng Chen; Ying Zhang; Xiao-Yuan Gong; Kai Zhou; Zhi Chen; Duan Wang; Zong-Ke Zhou; Liu Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Biomechanical effect of intertrochanteric curved varus osteotomy on stress reduction in femoral head osteonecrosis: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yuzhu Wang; Go Yamako; Takato Okada; Hideki Arakawa; Yoshihiro Nakamura; Etsuo Chosa
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.