| Literature DB >> 30344649 |
Natalia Perez-Moral1, Shikha Saha1, Mark Philo1, Dave J Hart1, Mark S Winterbone1, Wendy J Hollands1, Mike Spurr2, John Bows2, Vera van der Velpen3, Paul A Kroon1, Peter J Curtis3.
Abstract
The aim was to incorporate vegetables containing the phytochemicals quercetin, apigenin, glucoraphanin and carotenoids into a processed potato-based snack and assess their bioaccessibility and bioavailability. Three different processing routes were tested for incorporation and retention of phytochemicals in snacks using individually quick frozen or freeze-dried vegetables. No significant differences in the uptake or transport of quercetin or apigenin between a vegetable mix or snacks were observed using the CaCo-2 transwell model. Simulated in vitro digestions predicted a substantial release of quercetin and apigenin, some release of glucoraphanin but none for carotenes from either the snack or equivalent steamed vegetables. In humans, there were no significant differences in the bioavailability of quercetin, apigenin or glucoraphanin from the snack or equivalent steamed vegetables. We have shown that significant quantities of freeze-dried vegetables can be incorporated into snacks with good retention of phytochemicals and with similar bioavailability to equivalent steamed vegetables.Entities:
Keywords: Digestion; Flavonoids; Food processing; Glucosinolates; Phytochemicals
Year: 2018 PMID: 30344649 PMCID: PMC6189524 DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2018.07.035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Foods ISSN: 1756-4646 Impact factor: 4.451
Fig. 1Overview of the steps followed to design a snack which incorporated freeze-dried vegetables and asses its bioequivalence with an equivalent quantity of steamed vegetables.
Fig. 2Processing steps in the preparation of snacks products.
Supplementary Material
Fig. 3Design of the Human Study.
Phytochemicals in freeze-dried-baked snacks, frozen baked snacks and frozen microwaved snacks using a ratio of vegetables broccoli:onion:carrot:parsley = 6:1.8:4.6:1.
| Final product (mg/100 g dry matter) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broccoli (glucoraphanin) | Onion | Carrots (β-carotene) | Parsley | |
| Freeze-dried-baked | 54.1 ± 3.2 | 27.5 ± 1.8 | 10.3 ± 0.3 | 138.9 ± 4.2 |
| Frozen-baked | 15.2 ± 1.9 | 3.9 ± 0.11 | 2.0 ± 0.01 | 22.1 ± 1.4 |
| Frozen-microwaved | 19.1 ± 1.7 | 11.4 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.47 | 61.3 ± 1.6 |
Total mg quercetin glucosides.
Total mg aglycone apigenin.
Phytochemicals measured in dough and in “freeze-dried-baked” snack product using different ratios of vegetables.
| (mg/100 g dry matter) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broccoli | Onion | Carrot | Parsley | |||||
| (Glucoraphanin) | (Quercetin) | (β-Carotene) | (Apigenin) | |||||
| Dough | Final Product | Dough | Final Product | Dough | Final Product | Dough | Final Product | |
| broccoli:onion:carrot:parsley 6:1.8:4.6:1 | 66.1 ± 4.3 | 54.1 ± 3.2 | 27.6 ± 1.0 | 27.5 ± 1.8 | 10.9 | 10.3 ± 0.3 | 139.7 ± 6.2 | 138.9 ± 4.2 |
| broccoli:onion:carrot:parsley 7.4:18.8:39.1:1 | 21.7 ± 1.8 | 22.4 ± 2.5 | 43.9 ± 1.7 | 49.4 ± 1.6 | 23.8 ± 0.7 | 10.3 ± 0.9 | 12.1 ± 1.0 | 13.0 ± 1.5 |
| broccoli:onion:carrot:parsley 3.5:9.2:19.6:1 | 18.6 ± 0.9 | 17.3 ± 0.8 | 36.1 ± 4.1 | 47.2 ± 2.1 | 28.5 ± 1.0 | 10.4 ± 1.5 | 14.3 ± 4.1 | 19.1 ± 0.2 |
| broccoli:onion:carrot:parsley 2.1:5.5:11.4:1 | 19.7 ± 0.5 | 16.9 ± 0.4 | 39.5 ± 3.6 | 44.1 ± 1.3 | 24.0 ± 0.7 | 10.1 ± 0.6 | 38.3 ± 11.6 | 40.7 ± 4.9 |
| 100% Carrot only | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 42.8 ± 3.7 | 13.6 ± 2.8 | n/a | n/a |
Total quercetin glycosides.
Total apigenin aglycones.
Fig. 4Rates of uptake and transport (Papp) by Caco-2/TC7 cells for quercetin (A) and apigenin (B) from a digested “freeze-dried-baked” snack and a digested “comparator vegetable mix” compared to an equivalent DMEM buffer control containing 40 µM apigenin or quercetin. Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Significance (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005) are for comparisons with the DMEM buffer control.
Comparison of mg of phytochemicals present in “freeze-dried-baked” snack product (75 g) and “vegetable meal” comparator (461 g).
| Glucoraphanin (mg) | Quercetin (mg) | Beta-Carotene (mg) | Apigenin (mg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snack | 12.7 ± 0.4 | 33.1 ± 1.3 | 7.6 ± 0.6 | 30.5 ± 4.9 |
| Cooked veg. meal | 12.6 ± 1.3 | 30.9 ± 0.9 | 23.5 ± 3.6 | 48.2 ± 3.5 |
Fig. 5Amount of glucoraphanin, quercetin, apigenin and carotenoids (lutein) measured in the liquid phase for samples taken at the end of the main stages during simulated in vitro digestion of a snack meal (snack) and a cooked vegetable meal comparator (VM). Each value is the average of duplicate measurements. Oral = sample after simulated oral phase, Pooled gastric = pool of timed samples from the simulated gastric phase, Duodenal = Sample taken at the end of the simulated duodenal digestion.
24 h urinary excretion of quercetin, apigenin and glucoraphanin metabolites expressed in nmol per mg intake of the corresponding compound. Statistical difference tested between vegetable based food product and minimally processed “vegetable meal” comparator using paired t-test, P < 0.05. A = apigenin, Q = quercetin, IR = isorhamnetin (3-O-methylquercetin), Glc = glucoside, GlcA = glucuronide, NAC = n-acetyl-cysteine.
| Vegetable meal | Snack | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (nmol/mg intake) | (nmol/mg intake) | Difference (absolute) | P-value | |
| Apigenin (A) | 3.55 ± 4.6 | 3.37 ± 6.6 | 0.19 | 0.89 |
| A-7-Glc | 0.21 ± 0.3 | 0.15 ± 0.4 | 0.05 | 0.37 |
| A-7-GlcA | 5.33 ± 6.6 | 6.32 ± 8.1 | 0.99 | 0.55 |
| Isorhamnetin (IR) | 0.44 ± 0.6 | 0.33 ± 0.4 | 0.11 | 0.19 |
| IR-3-GlcA | 2.67 ± 2.7 | 1.60 ± 2.0 | 1.07 | 0.02 |
| Quercetin (Q) | 0.72 ± 1.3 | 0.34 ± 0.7 | 0.38 | 0.12 |
| Quercetin-3-GlcA | 4.40 ± 2.5 | 4.17 ± 3.3 | 0.23 | 0.75 |
| Quercetin-3-Glc | 0.07 ± 0.1 | 0.04 ± 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.45 |
| Quercetin-3-sulfate | 3.36 ± 1.8 | 2.58 ± 1.9 | 0.79 | 0.10 |
| Sulforaphane | 43.72 ± 44.2 | 36.25 ± 27.9 | 7.47 | 0.42 |
| Sulforaphane-NAC | 508.54 ± 450.9 | 272.17 ± 280.8 | 236.4 | 0.06 |
| Sulforaphane-NAC | 508.54 ± 450.9 | 272.17 ± 280.8 | 236.4 | 0.06 |