Literature DB >> 30344445

Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient Ozone and Particulate Matter in 2025.

Margaret Zawacki1, Kirk R Baker2, Sharon Phillips2, Ken Davidson3, Philip Wolfe4.   

Abstract

The contribution of precursor emissions from 17 mobile source sectors to ambient ozone and fine particulate matter levels across the U.S. were evaluated, using the CAMx photochemical model, to identify which mobile source sectors are projected to have the largest impacts on air pollution in 2025. Both onroad and nonroad sectors contribute considerably to projected air pollution across much of the country. Summer ozone season ozone contributions between 2 and 5 ppb, which are among the highest levels presented on the maps of mobile source sectors, are largely found in the southeast United States from the onroad sectors, most notably light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles, and along the coastline from the Category 3 (C3) marine sector. Annual average PM2.5 contributions between 0.5 to 0.9 μg/m3, which are among the highest levels presented on the maps of mobile source sectors, are found throughout the Midwest and along portions of the east and west coast from onroad sectors as well as nonroad diesel and rail sectors. Additionally, contributions of precursor emissions to ambient ozone and PM2.5 levels were evaluated to understand the range of impacts from precursors in the various mobile source sectors. For most mobile source sectors, in most locations, NOX emissions contributed more to ozone than VOC emissions, and secondary PM2.5 contributed more to ambient PM2.5 than primary PM2.5. The largest ozone levels on the maps showing contributions from mobile source NOX emissions tended to be between 2 and 5 ppb, while the largest ozone levels on the maps showing contributions from mobile source VOC emissions tended to be between 0.9 and 2 ppb, except for southern California where ozone contributions from VOC emissions from onroad light duty vehicles were between 2 and 5 ppb. The largest contributions to ambient PM2.5 on the maps showing primary and secondary contributions from mobile source sectors tended to be between 0.1 and 0.5 μg/m3. The contribution from primary PM2.5 extended over localized areas (urban-scale) and the contribution from secondary PM2.5 extended over more regional (multi-state) areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air pollution; mobile source; ozone; particulate matter; source apportionment

Year:  2018        PMID: 30344445      PMCID: PMC6192431          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of source apportionment and sensitivity analysis in a particulate matter air duality model.

Authors:  Bonyoung Koo; Gary M Wilson; Ralph E Morris; Alan M Dunker; Greg Yarwood
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Ozone trends across the United States over a period of decreasing NOx and VOC emissions.

Authors:  Heather Simon; Adam Reff; Benjamin Wells; Jia Xing; Neil Frank
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Assessing Model Characterization of Single Source Secondary Pollutant Impacts Using 2013 SENEX Field Study Measurements.

Authors:  Kirk R Baker; Matthew C Woody
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Future-year ozone prediction for the United States using updated models and inputs.

Authors:  Susan Collet; Toru Kidokoro; Prakash Karamchandani; Tejas Shah; Jaegun Jung
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  The recent and future health burden of air pollution apportioned across U.S. sectors.

Authors:  Neal Fann; Charles M Fulcher; Kirk Baker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  "What We Breathe Impacts Our Health: Improving Understanding of the Link between Air Pollution and Health".

Authors:  J Jason West; Aaron Cohen; Frank Dentener; Bert Brunekreef; Tong Zhu; Ben Armstrong; Michelle L Bell; Michael Brauer; Gregory Carmichael; Dan L Costa; Douglas W Dockery; Michael Kleeman; Michal Krzyzanowski; Nino Künzli; Catherine Liousse; Shih-Chun Candice Lung; Randall V Martin; Ulrich Pöschl; C Arden Pope; James M Roberts; Armistead G Russell; Christine Wiedinmyer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone.

Authors:  Neal Fann; Amy D Lamson; Susan C Anenberg; Karen Wesson; David Risley; Bryan J Hubbell
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  Formaldehyde production from isoprene oxidation across NOx regimes.

Authors:  G M Wolfe; J Kaiser; T F Hanisco; F N Keutsch; J A de Gouw; J B Gilman; M Graus; C D Hatch; J Holloway; L W Horowitz; B H Lee; B M Lerner; F Lopez-Hilifiker; J Mao; M R Marvin; J Peischl; I B Pollack; J M Roberts; T B Ryerson; J A Thornton; P R Veres; C Warneke
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 6.133

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Meteorological and Air Quality Modeling for Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.

Authors:  K R Baker; T K V Nguyen; N Sareen; B H Henderson
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Monetized health benefits attributable to mobile source emission reductions across the United States in 2025.

Authors:  Philip Wolfe; Kenneth Davidson; Charles Fulcher; Neal Fann; Margaret Zawacki; Kirk R Baker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Contribution of mobile sources to secondary formation of carbonyl compounds.

Authors:  Rich Cook; Sharon Phillips; Madeleine Strum; Alison Eyth; James Thurman
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  The Effect of Transportation and Wildfires on the Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of PM2.5 Mass in the New York-New Jersey Metropolitan Statistical Area.

Authors:  Subraham Singh; Glen Johnson; Ilias G Kavouras
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2022-06-07

5.  The recent and future health burden of the U.S. mobile sector apportioned by source.

Authors:  Kenneth Davidson; Neal Fann; Margaret Zawacki; Charles Fulcher; Kirk R Baker
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 6.793

6.  Impact of next-generation vehicles on tropospheric ozone estimated by chemical transport model in the Kanto region of Japan.

Authors:  Hiroo Hata; Kenichi Tonokura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.