Literature DB >> 23506413

The recent and future health burden of air pollution apportioned across U.S. sectors.

Neal Fann1, Charles M Fulcher, Kirk Baker.   

Abstract

Recent risk assessments have characterized the overall burden of recent PM2.5 and ozone levels on public health, but generally not the variability of these impacts over time or by sector. Using photochemical source apportionment modeling and a health impact function, we attribute PM2.5 and ozone air quality levels, population exposure and health burden to 23 industrial point, area, mobile and international emission sectors in the Continental U.S. in 2005 and 2016. Our modeled policy scenarios account for a suite of emission control requirements affecting many of these sectors. Between these two years, the number of PM2.5 and ozone-related deaths attributable to power plants and mobile sources falls from about 68,000 (90% confidence interval from 48,000 to 87,000) to about 36,000 (90% confidence intervals from 26,000 to 47,000). Area source mortality risk grows slightly between 2005 and 2016, due largely to population growth. Uncertainties relating to the timing and magnitude of the emission reductions may affect the size of these estimates. The detailed sector-level estimates of the size and distribution of mortality and morbidity risk suggest that the air pollution mortality burden has fallen over time but that many sectors continue to pose a substantial risk to human health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23506413     DOI: 10.1021/es304831q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  29 in total

1.  Health impact metrics for air pollution management strategies.

Authors:  Sheena E Martenies; Donele Wilkins; Stuart A Batterman
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Fire behavior and smoke modeling: Model improvement and measurement needs for next-generation smoke research and forecasting systems.

Authors:  Yongqiang Liu; Adam Kochanski; Kirk R Baker; William Mell; Rodman Linn; Ronan Paugam; Jan Mandel; Aime Fournier; Mary Ann Jenkins; Scott Goodrick; Gary Achtemeier; Fengjun Zhao; Roger Ottmar; Nancy Hf French; Narasimhan Larkin; Timothy Brown; Andrew Hudak; Matthew Dickinson; Brian Potter; Craig Clements; Shawn Urbanski; Susan Prichard; Adam Watts; Derek McNamara
Journal:  Int J Wildland Fire       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.200

3.  Meteorological and Air Quality Modeling for Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.

Authors:  K R Baker; T K V Nguyen; N Sareen; B H Henderson
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Monetized health benefits attributable to mobile source emission reductions across the United States in 2025.

Authors:  Philip Wolfe; Kenneth Davidson; Charles Fulcher; Neal Fann; Margaret Zawacki; Kirk R Baker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  The quest for improved air quality may push China to continue its CO2 reduction beyond the Paris Commitment.

Authors:  Jia Xing; Xi Lu; Shuxiao Wang; Tong Wang; Dian Ding; Sha Yu; Drew Shindell; Yang Ou; Lidia Morawska; Siwei Li; Lu Ren; Yuqiang Zhang; Dan Loughlin; Haotian Zheng; Bin Zhao; Shuchang Liu; Kirk R Smith; Jiming Hao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Modeling crop residue burning experiments to evaluate smoke emissions and plume transport.

Authors:  Luxi Zhou; Kirk R Baker; Sergey L Napelenok; George Pouliot; Robert Elleman; Susan M O'Neill; Shawn P Urbanski; David C Wong
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Estimating environmental co-benefits of U.S. low-carbon pathways using an integrated assessment model with state-level resolution.

Authors:  Yang Ou; Wenjing Shi; Steven J Smith; Catherine M Ledna; J Jason West; Christopher G Nolte; Daniel H Loughlin
Journal:  Appl Energy       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 9.746

8.  The influence of air quality model resolution on health impact assessment for fine particulate matter and its components.

Authors:  Ying Li; Daven K Henze; Darby Jack; Patrick L Kinney
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.763

9.  Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient Ozone and Particulate Matter in 2025.

Authors:  Margaret Zawacki; Kirk R Baker; Sharon Phillips; Ken Davidson; Philip Wolfe
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Health benefit assessment of PM2.5 reduction in Pearl River Delta region of China using a model-monitor data fusion approach.

Authors:  Jiabin Li; Yun Zhu; James T Kelly; Carey J Jang; Shuxiao Wang; Adel Hanna; Jia Xing; Che-Jen Lin; Shicheng Long; Lian Yu
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 6.789

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.