Literature DB >> 28248097

Assessing Model Characterization of Single Source Secondary Pollutant Impacts Using 2013 SENEX Field Study Measurements.

Kirk R Baker1, Matthew C Woody2.   

Abstract

Aircraft measurements made downwind from specific coal fired power plants during the 2013 Southeast Nexus field campaign provide a unique opportunity to evaluate single source photochemical model predictions of both O3 and secondary PM2.5 species. The model did well at predicting downwind plume placement. The model shows similar patterns of an increasing fraction of PM2.5 sulfate ion to the sum of SO2 and PM2.5 sulfate ion by distance from the source compared with ambient based estimates. The model was less consistent in capturing downwind ambient based trends in conversion of NOX to NOY from these sources. Source sensitivity approaches capture near-source O3 titration by fresh NO emissions, in particular subgrid plume treatment. However, capturing this near-source chemical feature did not translate into better downwind peak estimates of single source O3 impacts. The model estimated O3 production from these sources but often was lower than ambient based source production. The downwind transect ambient measurements, in particular secondary PM2.5 and O3, have some level of contribution from other sources which makes direct comparison with model source contribution challenging. Model source attribution results suggest contribution to secondary pollutants from multiple sources even where primary pollutants indicate the presence of a single source.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28248097      PMCID: PMC6145072          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Model representation of secondary organic aerosol in CMAQv4.7.

Authors:  Annmarie G Carlton; Prakash V Bhave; Sergey L Napelenok; Edward O Edney; Golam Sarwar; Robert W Pinder; George A Pouliot; Marc Houyoux
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Single-source impact analysis using three-dimensional air quality models.

Authors:  Michelle S Bergin; Armistead G Russell; Mehmet T Odman; Daniel S Cohan; William L Chameides
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Implementation and application of sub-grid-scale plume treatment in the latest version of EPA's third-generation air quality model, CMAQ 5.01.

Authors:  Prakash Karamchandani; Jeremiah Johnson; Greg Yarwood; Eladio Knipping
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Instrumentation and Measurement Strategy for the NOAA SENEX Aircraft Campaign as Part of the Southeast Atmosphere Study 2013.

Authors:  C Warneke; M Trainer; J A de Gouw; D D Parrish; D W Fahey; A R Ravishankara; A M Middlebrook; C A Brock; J M Roberts; S S Brown; J A Neuman; B M Lerner; D Lack; D Law; G Hübler; I Pollack; S Sjostedt; T B Ryerson; J B Gilman; J Liao; J Holloway; J Peischl; J B Nowak; K Aikin; K-E Min; R A Washenfelder; M G Graus; M Richardson; M Z Markovic; N L Wagner; A Welti; P R Veres; P Edwards; J P Schwarz; T Gordon; W P Dube; S McKeen; J Brioude; R Ahmadov; A Bougiatioti; J J Lin; A Nenes; G M Wolfe; T F Hanisco; B H Lee; F D Lopez-Hilfiker; J A Thornton; F N Keutsch; J Kaiser; J Mao; C Hatch
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: source apportionment and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Daniel S Cohan; Amir Hakami; Yongtao Hu; Armistead G Russell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Photochemical modeling of the Ozark isoprene volcano: MEGAN, BEIS, and their impacts on air quality predictions.

Authors:  Annmarie G Carlton; Kirk R Baker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Meteorological and Air Quality Modeling for Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.

Authors:  K R Baker; T K V Nguyen; N Sareen; B H Henderson
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Monetized health benefits attributable to mobile source emission reductions across the United States in 2025.

Authors:  Philip Wolfe; Kenneth Davidson; Charles Fulcher; Neal Fann; Margaret Zawacki; Kirk R Baker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient Ozone and Particulate Matter in 2025.

Authors:  Margaret Zawacki; Kirk R Baker; Sharon Phillips; Ken Davidson; Philip Wolfe
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Southeast Atmosphere Studies: learning from model-observation syntheses.

Authors:  Jingqiu Mao; Annmarie Carlton; Ronald C Cohen; William H Brune; Steven S Brown; Glenn M Wolfe; Jose L Jimenez; Havala O T Pye; Nga Lee Ng; Lu Xu; V Faye McNeill; Kostas Tsigaridis; Brian C McDonald; Carsten Warneke; Alex Guenther; Matthew J Alvarado; Joost de Gouw; Loretta J Mickley; Eric M Leibensperger; Rohit Mathur; Christopher G Nolte; Robert W Portmann; Nadine Unger; Mika Tosca; Larry W Horowitz
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.133

5.  Characterizing CO and NO y Sources and Relative Ambient Ratios in the Baltimore Area Using Ambient Measurements and Source Attribution Modeling.

Authors:  Heather Simon; Luke C Valin; Kirk R Baker; Barron H Henderson; James H Crawford; Sally E Pusede; James T Kelly; Kristen M Foley; R Chris Owen; Ronald C Cohen; Brian Timin; Andrew J Weinheimer; Norm Possiel; Chris Misenis; Glenn S Diskin; Alan Fried
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.