Literature DB >> 30296769

Monetized health benefits attributable to mobile source emission reductions across the United States in 2025.

Philip Wolfe1, Kenneth Davidson2, Charles Fulcher3, Neal Fann4, Margaret Zawacki5, Kirk R Baker6.   

Abstract

By-products of mobile source combustion processes, such as those associated with gasoline- and diesel-powered engines, include direct emissions of particulate matter as well as precursors to particulate matter and ground-level ozone. Human exposure to fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) is associated with increased incidence of premature mortality and morbidity outcomes. This study builds upon recent, detailed source-apportionment air quality modeling to project the health-related benefits of reducing PM2.5 from mobile sources across the contiguous U.S. in 2025. Updating a previously published benefits analysis approach, we develop national-level benefit per ton estimates for directly emitted PM2.5, SO2/pSO4, and NOX for 16 mobile source sectors spanning onroad vehicles, nonroad engines and equipment, trains, marine vessels, and aircraft. These benefit per ton estimates provide a reduced-form tool for estimating and comparing benefits across multiple mobile source emission scenarios and can be applied to assess the benefits of mobile source policies designed to improve air quality. We found the benefit per ton of directly emitted PM2.5 in 2025 ranges from $110,000 for nonroad agriculture sources to $700,000 for onroad light duty gas cars and motorcycles (in 2015 dollars and based on an estimate of PM-related mortality derived from the American Cancer Society cohort study). Benefit per ton values for SO2/pSO4 range from $52,000 for aircraft sources (including emissions from ground support vehicles) to $300,000 for onroad light duty diesel emissions. Benefit per ton values for NOX range from $2100 for C1 and C2 marine vessels to $7500 for "nonroad all other" mobile sources, including industrial, logging, and oil field sources. Benefit per ton estimates increase approximately 2.26-fold when using an alternative concentration response function to derive PM2.5-related mortality. We also report benefit per ton values for the eastern and western U.S. to account for broad spatial heterogeneity patterns in emissions reductions, population exposure and air quality benefits. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Benefits per ton; Health benefits; Mobile source; Particulate matter

Year:  2018        PMID: 30296769      PMCID: PMC7259328          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  22 in total

1.  Global mortality attributable to aircraft cruise emissions.

Authors:  Steven R H Barrett; Rex E Britter; Ian A Waitz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Analysis of PM2.5 using the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP).

Authors:  Kenneth Davidson; Aaron Hallberg; Donald McCubbin; Bryan Hubbell
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2007-02-01

3.  Modeling variability in air pollution-related health damages from individual airport emissions.

Authors:  Stefani L Penn; Scott T Boone; Brian C Harvey; Wendy Heiger-Bernays; Yorghos Tripodis; Sarav Arunachalam; Jonathan I Levy
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Minimizing the health and climate impacts of emissions from heavy-duty public transportation bus fleets through operational optimization.

Authors:  Brian Gouge; Hadi Dowlatabadi; Francis J Ries
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  The recent and future health burden of air pollution apportioned across U.S. sectors.

Authors:  Neal Fann; Charles M Fulcher; Kirk Baker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  "What We Breathe Impacts Our Health: Improving Understanding of the Link between Air Pollution and Health".

Authors:  J Jason West; Aaron Cohen; Frank Dentener; Bert Brunekreef; Tong Zhu; Ben Armstrong; Michelle L Bell; Michael Brauer; Gregory Carmichael; Dan L Costa; Douglas W Dockery; Michael Kleeman; Michal Krzyzanowski; Nino Künzli; Catherine Liousse; Shih-Chun Candice Lung; Randall V Martin; Ulrich Pöschl; C Arden Pope; James M Roberts; Armistead G Russell; Christine Wiedinmyer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  A self-consistent method to assess air quality co-benefits from U.S. climate policies.

Authors:  Rebecca K Saari; Noelle E Selin; Sebastian Rausch; Tammy M Thompson
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.235

8.  Long-Term Ozone Exposure and Mortality in a Large Prospective Study.

Authors:  Michelle C Turner; Michael Jerrett; C Arden Pope; Daniel Krewski; Susan M Gapstur; W Ryan Diver; Bernardo S Beckerman; Julian D Marshall; Jason Su; Daniel L Crouse; Richard T Burnett
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  The influence of location, source, and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution.

Authors:  Neal Fann; Charles M Fulcher; Bryan J Hubbell
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.763

10.  Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient Ozone and Particulate Matter in 2025.

Authors:  Margaret Zawacki; Kirk R Baker; Sharon Phillips; Ken Davidson; Philip Wolfe
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.798

View more
  3 in total

1.  Premature mortality related to United States cross-state air pollution.

Authors:  Irene C Dedoussi; Sebastian D Eastham; Erwan Monier; Steven R H Barrett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The recent and future health burden of the U.S. mobile sector apportioned by source.

Authors:  Kenneth Davidson; Neal Fann; Margaret Zawacki; Charles Fulcher; Kirk R Baker
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 6.793

Review 3.  How will air quality effects on human health, crops and ecosystems change in the future?

Authors:  Erika von Schneidemesser; Charles Driscoll; Harald E Rieder; Luke D Schiferl
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.226

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.