Joshua J Mooney1, Jay Bhattacharya2, Gundeep S Dhillon3. 1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA;. Electronic address: jjmooney@stanford.edu. 2. Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. 3. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The United States lung allocation system prioritizes allocation based on medical urgency and benefit but does not address a federal mandate for broader geographic organ sharing. It is unknown whether broader geographic sharing of donor lungs would improve lung transplant waitlist outcomes. METHODS: A discrete event microsimulation model simulated donor lung allocation according to different geographic lung-sharing policies, including the historic local donor service area (DSA)-based policy and hypothetical policies that prioritize candidates to donors within 500-mile or 1,000-mile geographic radii. Candidate waitlist mortality, number of transplants, and 1-year survival were compared across organ allocation policies. Waitlist mortality rates were further stratified by diagnosis, Lung Allocation Score (LAS) threshold, ABO blood type, and region. RESULTS: Under broader geographic lung sharing, the proportion of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease transplant recipients decreased, whereas the proportion of pulmonary fibrosis recipients increased. Waitlist mortality decreased with broader geographic lung sharing with a 21.3% decrease in waitlist mortality with 500-mile lung sharing and a 31.8% decrease in waitlist mortality with 1,000-mile lung sharing. The decrease in waitlist deaths occured across all U.S. geographic regions and was greatest in candidates with pulmonary fibrosis and/or high medical urgency. CONCLUSIONS: Broader geographic sharing of donor lungs could reduce waitlist mortality, particularly among pulmonary fibrosis and high-medical-urgency candidates.
BACKGROUND: The United States lung allocation system prioritizes allocation based on medical urgency and benefit but does not address a federal mandate for broader geographic organ sharing. It is unknown whether broader geographic sharing of donor lungs would improve lung transplant waitlist outcomes. METHODS: A discrete event microsimulation model simulated donor lung allocation according to different geographic lung-sharing policies, including the historic local donor service area (DSA)-based policy and hypothetical policies that prioritize candidates to donors within 500-mile or 1,000-mile geographic radii. Candidate waitlist mortality, number of transplants, and 1-year survival were compared across organ allocation policies. Waitlist mortality rates were further stratified by diagnosis, Lung Allocation Score (LAS) threshold, ABO blood type, and region. RESULTS: Under broader geographic lung sharing, the proportion of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease transplant recipients decreased, whereas the proportion of pulmonary fibrosis recipients increased. Waitlist mortality decreased with broader geographic lung sharing with a 21.3% decrease in waitlist mortality with 500-mile lung sharing and a 31.8% decrease in waitlist mortality with 1,000-mile lung sharing. The decrease in waitlist deaths occured across all U.S. geographic regions and was greatest in candidates with pulmonary fibrosis and/or high medical urgency. CONCLUSIONS: Broader geographic sharing of donor lungs could reduce waitlist mortality, particularly among pulmonary fibrosis and high-medical-urgency candidates.
Authors: Joshua C Grimm; Vicente Valero; Arman Kilic; Jonathan T Magruder; Christian A Merlo; Pali D Shah; Ashish S Shah Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: T M Egan; S Murray; R T Bustami; T H Shearon; K P McCullough; L B Edwards; M A Coke; E R Garrity; S C Sweet; D A Heiney; F L Grover Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2006 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Mark J Russo; David Meltzer; Aurelie Merlo; Elizabeth Johnson; Nazly M Shariati; Joshua R Sonett; Robert Gibbons Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: S E Gentry; E K H Chow; N Dzebisashvili; M A Schnitzler; K L Lentine; C E Wickliffe; E Shteyn; J Pyke; A Israni; B Kasiske; D L Segev; D A Axelrod Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Christian A Merlo; Eric S Weiss; Jonathan B Orens; Marvin C Borja; Marie Diener-West; John V Conte; Ashish S Shah Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: B G Maxwell; J E Levitt; B A Goldstein; J J Mooney; M R Nicolls; M Zamora; V Valentine; D Weill; G S Dhillon Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: W M Tsuang; K M Chan; M A Skeans; J Pyke; M I Hertz; A J Israni; L Robbins-Callahan; G Visner; X Wang; T C Wozniak; M Valapour Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Jonathan D McCue; Josh Mooney; Jacob Quail; Amanda Arrington; Cynthia Herrington; Peter S Dahlberg Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Luke J Benvenuto; Michaela R Anderson; Meghan Aversa; Mark E Snyder; Hilary Robbins; Lori Shah; Harpreet Singh Grewal; David Anderson; Joseph Costa; Brian P Stanifer; Philippe Lemaitre; Joshua R Sonett; Frank D'Ovidio; Selim M Arcasoy Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 13.569