Literature DB >> 15717817

Simulating the allocation of organs for transplantation.

David Thompson1, Larry Waisanen, Robert Wolfe, Robert M Merion, Keith McCullough, Ann Rodgers.   

Abstract

The demand for donated organs greatly exceeds supply and many candidates die awaiting transplantation. Policies for allocating deceased donor organs may address equity of access and medical efficacy, but typically must be implemented with incomplete information. Simulation-based analysis can inform the policy process by predicting the likely effects of alternative policies on a wide variety of outcomes of interest. This paper describes a family of simulations developed by the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and initial experience in the application of one member of this family, the Liver Simulated Allocation Model (LSAM).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15717817     DOI: 10.1007/s10729-004-7541-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  6 in total

1.  Dynamic analysis of liver allocation policies.

Authors:  D H Howard
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices.

Authors:  R N Pugh; I M Murray-Lyon; J L Dawson; M C Pietroni; R Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  A simulation modelling approach to evaluating alternative policies for the management of the waiting list for liver transplantation.

Authors:  J Ratcliffe; T Young; M Buxton; T Eldabi; R Paul; A Burroughs; G Papatheodoridis; K Rolles
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2001-06

Review 4.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Longitudinal assessment of mortality risk among candidates for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Robert M Merion; Robert A Wolfe; Dawn M Dykstra; Alan B Leichtman; Brenda Gillespie; Philip J Held
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  Development of a pediatric end-stage liver disease score to predict poor outcome in children awaiting liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sue V McDiarmid; Ravinder Anand; Anne S Lindblad
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

  6 in total
  23 in total

1.  An efficient method for kidney allocation problem: a credibility-based fuzzy common weights data envelopment analysis approach.

Authors:  Sahar Ahmadvand; Mir Saman Pishvaee
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2017-08-09

2.  Accept/decline decision module for the liver simulated allocation model.

Authors:  Sang-Phil Kim; Diwakar Gupta; Ajay K Israni; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-08-30

3.  The proportion of Model for End-stage Liver Disease Sodium score attributable to creatinine independently predicts post-transplant survival and renal complications.

Authors:  Therese Bittermann; Rebecca A Hubbard; James D Lewis; David S Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  D-MELD risk capping improves post-transplant and overall mortality under markov microsimulation.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Halldorson; Robert L Carithers; Renuka Bhattacharya; Ramasamy Bakthavatsalam; Iris W Liou; Andre A Dick; Jorge D Reyes; James D Perkins
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-09-24

5.  Impact of Acuity Circles on Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.

Authors:  Douglas Mogul; Emily R Perito; Nicholas Wood; George V Mazariegos; Douglas VanDerwerken; Samar H Ibrahim; Saeed Mohammad; Pamela L Valentino; Sommer Gentry; Evelyn Hsu
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Addressing geographic disparities in liver transplantation through redistricting.

Authors:  S E Gentry; A B Massie; S W Cheek; K L Lentine; E H Chow; C E Wickliffe; N Dzebashvili; P R Salvalaggio; M A Schnitzler; D A Axelrod; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Comparison of seven liver allocation models with respect to lives saved among patients on the liver transplant waiting list.

Authors:  Laurence S Magder; Arie Regev; Ayse L Mindikoglu
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 8.  Big data in organ transplantation: registries and administrative claims.

Authors:  A B Massie; L M Kucirka; L M Kuricka; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Redesigning Organ Allocation Boundaries for Liver Transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Naoru Koizumi; Rajesh Ganesan; Monica Gentili; Chun-Hung Chen; Nigel Waters; Debasree DasGupta; Dennis Nicholas; Amit Patel; Divya Srinivasan; Keith Melancon
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Health Care Syst Eng (2013)       Date:  2014

10.  Simulation modeling of the impact of proposed new simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation policies.

Authors:  Yaojen Chang; Lorenzo Gallon; Kirti Shetty; Yuchia Chang; Colleen Jay; Josh Levitsky; Bing Ho; Talia Baker; Daniela Ladner; John Friedewald; Michael Abecassis; Gordon Hazen; Anton I Skaro
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.