Luke J Benvenuto1, Michaela R Anderson2, Meghan Aversa3, Mark E Snyder4, Hilary Robbins2, Lori Shah2, Harpreet Singh Grewal2, David Anderson5, Joseph Costa6, Brian P Stanifer6, Philippe Lemaitre6, Joshua R Sonett6, Frank D'Ovidio6, Selim M Arcasoy2. 1. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: Lb2711@cumc.columbia.edu. 2. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York. 3. Division of Respirology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Management, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania. 6. Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The primary lung allocation unit was expanded from the donation service area to a 250-mile radius in 2017. Prior to the change, geographic disparities in donor lung availability impacted waitlist outcomes. We sought to determine if the new allocation system improved these disparities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the 2-year period before and after the change. Donor lung availability was defined as the ratio of donor lungs to waitlist candidates in the primary allocation unit. Transplant centers were divided into quartiles by donor lung availability. Multivariable competing risk models were used to determine the association between lung availability and waitlist outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models compared post-transplant survival. RESULTS: Prior to the allocation change, the unadjusted transplant rate at centers in the lowest and highest quartiles was 132 and 607 transplants per 100 waitlist years. Candidates in the lowest quartile of donor lung availability had a 61% adjusted lower transplantation rate compared to candidates in highest quartile (sub-hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.44). After the allocation change, the disparity decreased resulting in an unadjusted transplant rate of 141 and 309 among centers in the lowest and highest quartiles. Candidates in the lowest quartile had a 38% adjusted lower transplantation rate compared to those in the highest (sHR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57-0.68). There was no significant difference in 1-year post-transplant survival. CONCLUSIONS: Although the expansion of the primary allocation unit improved disparities in waitlist outcomes without any change in post-transplant survival, there still remain significant differences due to geography.
BACKGROUND: The primary lung allocation unit was expanded from the donation service area to a 250-mile radius in 2017. Prior to the change, geographic disparities in donor lung availability impacted waitlist outcomes. We sought to determine if the new allocation system improved these disparities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the 2-year period before and after the change. Donor lung availability was defined as the ratio of donor lungs to waitlist candidates in the primary allocation unit. Transplant centers were divided into quartiles by donor lung availability. Multivariable competing risk models were used to determine the association between lung availability and waitlist outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models compared post-transplant survival. RESULTS: Prior to the allocation change, the unadjusted transplant rate at centers in the lowest and highest quartiles was 132 and 607 transplants per 100 waitlist years. Candidates in the lowest quartile of donor lung availability had a 61% adjusted lower transplantation rate compared to candidates in highest quartile (sub-hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.44). After the allocation change, the disparity decreased resulting in an unadjusted transplant rate of 141 and 309 among centers in the lowest and highest quartiles. Candidates in the lowest quartile had a 38% adjusted lower transplantation rate compared to those in the highest (sHR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57-0.68). There was no significant difference in 1-year post-transplant survival. CONCLUSIONS: Although the expansion of the primary allocation unit improved disparities in waitlist outcomes without any change in post-transplant survival, there still remain significant differences due to geography.
Authors: Johannes Textor; Benito van der Zander; Mark S Gilthorpe; Maciej Liskiewicz; George Th Ellison Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: M Valapour; C J Lehr; M A Skeans; J M Smith; E Miller; R Goff; J Foutz; A K Israni; J J Snyder; B L Kasiske Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Martin Kosztowski; Sheng Zhou; Errol Bush; Robert S Higgins; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-12-15 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Alexander Iribarne; David O Meltzer; Dhaval Chauhan; Joshua R Sonett; Robert D Gibbons; Wickii Vigneswaran; Mark J Russo Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Luke J Benvenuto; David R Anderson; Hanyoung P Kim; Jaime L Hook; Lori Shah; Hilary Y Robbins; Frank D'Ovidio; Matthew Bacchetta; Joshua R Sonett; Selim M Arcasoy Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-01-27 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: T M Egan; S Murray; R T Bustami; T H Shearon; K P McCullough; L B Edwards; M A Coke; E R Garrity; S C Sweet; D A Heiney; F L Grover Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2006 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Mark J Russo; David Meltzer; Aurelie Merlo; Elizabeth Johnson; Nazly M Shariati; Joshua R Sonett; Robert Gibbons Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 4.330