Spectroscopic Characterization of an Extensive Set of c-Type Peptide Fragment Ions Formed by Electron Transfer Dissociation Suggests Exclusive Formation of Amide Isomers.

Electron attachment dissociation (electron capture dissociation (ECD) and electron transfer dissociation (ETD)) applied to gaseous multiply protonated peptides leads predominantly to backbone N-Cα bond cleavages and the formation of c- and z-type fragment ions. The mechanisms involved in the formation of these ions have been the subject of much discussion. Here, we determine the molecular structures of an extensive set of c-type ions produced by ETD using infrared ion spectroscopy. Nine c3- and c4-ions are investigated to establish their C-terminal structure as either enol-imine or amide isomers by comparison of the experimental infrared spectra with quantum-chemically predicted spectra for both structural variants. The spectra suggest that all c-ions investigated possess an amide structure; the absence of the NH bending mode at approximately 1000-1200 cm-1 serves as an important diagnostic feature.

Mass spectrometry (MS) is well-established as the leading technique for protein sequencing.[1] Collision induced dissociation (CID) has long been the main tandem MS (MS/MS) method used to induce peptide fragmentation, cleaving protonated n class="Chemical">peptides at their amide bonds[2] and generating predominantly b- and y-type sequence ions.[3] However, the inability of CID MS/MS to sequence labile post translational modifications (PTMs) and its limited applicability in top-down protein sequencing[4−9] have led to an increase in the use of fragmentation strategies based on electron attachment to the multiply protonated target, in particular electron capture dissociation (ECD) and electron transfer dissociation (ETD).[10] ECD and ETD, jointly termed ExD, increase sequence coverage and thus enable top-down sequencing, mitigating the need for enzymatic digestion of a protein into smaller peptides,[5,11−24] and moreover leave labile PTMs attached, which was originally suggested to be due to a nonergodic nature of the dissociation process, but this hypothesis was later rejected.[25−27] ExD of multiply charged gaseous proteins results mainly in c- and z-type ions, cleaving the backbone at the N–Cα bond.[24,28−36] Complementary information is obtained by combining CID and ExD for protein identification as different ion types are formed.

In ETD, an anionic species (often the radical anion of fluoranthene[10]) is guided into the ion trap and stored along with the multiply protonated precursor n class="Chemical">peptide ion of interest.[11,24,37] An ion/ion reaction results in electron transfer and charge-reduction of the peptide ion forming a radical species.[38] The charge recombination induces cleavage of the peptide backbone predominantly at the N–Cα bonds,[24,28−36] resulting in c- and radical z-type sequence ions.

The precise reaction mechanisms of ETD have been the subject of extensive discussion.[27,29,30,24,39−54] Several mechanisms have been proposed, with the Cornell[29,40,45,55] and Utah–Washington[41,46−49,56−58] mechanisms being the most prominent ones. In the Cornell mechanism, electron attachment occurs at a protonated site that is hydrogen-bonded to a nearby carbonyl.[45] n class="Chemical">Hydrogen atom transfer from the now neutralized protonation site to the carbonyl group then induces N–Cα bond cleavage and the formation of c-type ions with an enol-imine structure at their C-terminal end (Scheme ). In the Utah–Washington hypothesis, the electron is captured in the π*-orbital of an amide carbonyl H-bonded to a protonated site, producing a charge-stabilized amide anion-radical intermediate, which isomerizes by proton transfer to the peptide bond amide oxygen or nitrogen;[35,59] proton transfer to the amide nitrogen upon cleavage of the N–Cα bond forms c-type ions with an amide moiety at the C-terminus. Charge stabilization by protonation, rather than by metal-ion coordination, was recently suggested to enhance the efficiency of c- and z-type ion formation.[54]

Scheme 1

Schematic Representation of Two Isomeric c-Type Product Ions That Have Been Proposed to Be Formed upon ETD

The top structure is the enol-imine c-type structure proposed to result from the Cornell mechanism. Following the Utah–Washington mechanism, c-type product ions can form as either an amide or enol-imine.

The top structure is the enol-imine c-type structure proposed to result from the Cornell mechanism. Following the Utah–Washington mechanism, c-type product ions can form as either an n class="Chemical">amide or enol-imine.

Because the two mechanisms lead to two different (isomeric) product ions, with either an enol-imine or an n class="Chemical">amide terminus, identification of the molecular structure of the c-type ions may shed light on their mechanism of formation. The combination of mass spectrometry, ion spectroscopy, and quantum-chemical calculations has become a powerful method for distinguishing isomers, tautomers, and conformers of MS/MS reaction products,[60−65] which has previously been used for the structural characterization of an ECD-generated c0-ion of a derivatized peptide.[66] Its structure was established to include an amide moiety as its C-terminus. More recently, the c4-ion produced by ETD on the doubly protonated GL*GGK peptide was also assigned as an amide structure on the basis of ultraviolet photodissociation and infrared multiple photon dissociation (IRMPD) spectroscopy experiments along with density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Calculated spectra distinguished the amide tautomer from the enol-imine tautomer by strong IR bands of the enol-imine product ion at 1040–1050 cm–1 and 1190–1220 cm–1, which were absent in the experimental spectrum.[67]

Ion mobility has also been used to characterize ETD fragment ions (c3, c4, z3, and z4 of [AAHAL+n class="Chemical">2H]2+).[68] Although the collisional cross sections (Ω) showed close agreement with calculations, the values for enol-imine and amide tautomers were nearly identical, not allowing the authors to distinguish between them. In another study, the CID fragmentation pattern of the c5-ion of GAILKGAILR was found to be essentially identical to that of the synthesized [GAILK-NH2+H]+ analog.[69] In contrast, CID fragmentation of the intact peptide [GAILK+H]+ showed a y3-fragment ion and several neutral loss-species, which were absent in the CID spectrum of the c5-ion (and of [GAILK-NH2+H]+).

Here we address the question of whether the formation of amide c-type ions is generic or not by applying IRMPD spectroscopy to probe the structure of an extensive set of ETD c-type ions. Tn class="Chemical">his also addresses the question of whether the fragment ion structure is influenced by the identity of the amino acid residue at the cleavage site. Peptides containing a Lys residue at the N-terminus were selected to favor c-ion formation upon ETD. The peptide length is varied (tetra- and heptapeptides), as is the amino acid residue N-terminal to cleavage site (Ala, His, or Phe); a peptide with a His residue C-terminal to the cleavage site was also included. An IRMPD spectrum was also recorded for the NH2 capped peptide of AAAA, as reference for an amide-structure c-type ion.

Figure presents the IRMPD spectrum of the c3 ion of [KAAA+2H]2+ compared with spectra predicted for different structural variants by DFT. The gray trace in the left panel is the computed spectrum for the lowest-energy conformer found for the n class="Chemical">amide isomeric form. The spectrum in blue represents an alternative, higher-energy (+18 kJ/mol) conformer of the same amide isomer. The right panel compares the IRMPD spectrum with the predicted spectrum for the lowest-energy conformer of the enol-imine isomer, which lies 60 kJ/mol above the lowest-energy amide conformer.

Figure 1

Experimental infrared spectrum of the ETD-generated c3-ion from [KAAA+2H]2+ (in black) compared with computed spectra for the lowest-energy amide structure (left, gray), a higher-energy conformation of the amide isomer (left, blue), and the lowest-energy enol-imine structure (red, right). The experimental spectrum is assigned as an amide structure based on the generally favorable overlap between the experimental and computed spectrum in blue and in particular on the absence of O–H and N–H bending modes in the experimental spectra, diagnostic for the enol-imine structure (indicated with asterisks on the right).

Experimental infrared spectrum of the ETD-generated c3-ion from [KAAA+2H]2+ (in black) compared with computed spectra for the lowest-energy n class="Chemical">amide structure (left, gray), a higher-energy conformation of the amide isomer (left, blue), and the lowest-energy enol-imine structure (red, right). The experimental spectrum is assigned as an amide structure based on the generally favorable overlap between the experimental and computed spectrum in blue and in particular on the absence of O–H and N–H bending modes in the experimental spectra, diagnostic for the enol-imine structure (indicated with asterisks on the right).

In the calculated enol-imine spectrum, two relatively strong diagnostic bands (*) are due to NH bending of the n class="Chemical">enol-imine moiety (1100 cm–1) and to a delocalized bending vibration involving enol-imine NH and OH bonds (840 cm–1). In the computed spectrum for the amide isomer, no strong bands are predicted at these frequencies. The observation that the experimental spectrum shows little or no intensity at these frequencies suggests that the c3-ion possesses an amide structure. The remainder of the experimental spectrum between 1200 and 1750 cm–1 also shows good agreement with the spectrum predicted for the amide isomer, especially for the conformer at slightly elevated energy (blue trace).

This isomeric structure assignment is in line with that for two c-type ExD fragments studied by IR spectroscopy previously.[66,67] Ref (66) addresses the structure of a (modified) n class="Chemical">c0-ion, so that the two isomeric product ions can conveniently be distinguished based on the absence or presence of the amide C=O stretch (at 1731 cm–1). The enol-imine structure does not possess a carbonyl moiety so that its predicted spectrum does not contain a C=O stretch band. The longer c3 and c4 ions studied in the present work possess multiple amide C=O moieties, one for each peptide linkage, so that the presence or absence of a carbonyl stretch is no longer a good diagnostic. Instead, the presence of the NH bending mode near 1100 cm–1 is used here as a diagnostic for the enol-imine structure.[67]

Peptides with a C-terminal NH2-cap are readily available and can serve as a reference for c-type fragment ions in the n class="Chemical">amide isomeric configuration.[66,67,69,70] The IRMPD spectrum of protonated NH2-capped tetra-alanine, [AAAA-NH2+H]+, is shown in Figure . The band near 1700 cm–1 is due to C=O stretches of the first and last peptide linkages, with the shoulder at 1670 cm–1 being due to a combined C=O stretch with N–H bending at the N-terminus of the peptide. The peak at 1600 cm–1 corresponds to NH bending at the protonated N-terminus, and that around 1500 cm–1 corresponds to modes with combined backbone NH and terminal NH3 bending character. Clearly, matching this feature with theory appears slightly more challenging than the other bands, which we shall keep in mind in our analysis below.

Figure 2

Experimental spectrum of NH2-capped AAAA compared with the computed spectrum for a N-terminally protonated structure.

Relying on the good overall match between experiment and theory in Figure and having established the salient distinguishing features between amide and n class="Chemical">enol-imine IR spectra, we extend our study to a large set of c3 and c4 ions generated from different precursor peptides. Figure shows the experimental IRMPD spectra of eight different c3 and c4 ions obtained from ETD on doubly protonated KAHA, KAAAAAA, KAAHAAA, KAHAAAA, and KAFAAAA. All experimental spectra are compared with the calculated spectra for both the enol-imine and the amide isomer, including different conformations of these isomers. In Figure , the left panels compare experimental spectra with computed spectra for amide isomers, with the best matching spectra in shaded blue and, if different, the most stable conformer in gray. The panels on the right show the predicted spectra for the alternative enol-imine isomers of each of the c-ions overlaid on the same experimental spectra; diagnostic NH and OH bending modes are indicated by asterisks. The spectrum for the lowest-energy conformer is shown in all cases.

Figure 3

Experimental spectra of a series of c3 and c4 ETD fragment ions (black) compared with the computed spectra for the amide structures (left, blue) and for the enol-imine isomers (red, right). The stars indicate the enol-imine NH and OH bending modes. Arrows indicate the protonation site. For the c4-ions of KAAAAAA and KAAHAAA, the best match is found for a higher-energy conformer; the spectrum of the lowest-energy amide conformer is shown in addition in light gray in these cases.

Experimental spectra of a series of c3 and c4 ETD fragment ions (black) compared with the computed spectra for the amide structures (left, blue) and for the n class="Chemical">enol-imine isomers (red, right). The stars indicate the enol-imine NH and OH bending modes. Arrows indicate the protonation site. For the c4-ions of KAAAAAA and KAAHAAA, the best match is found for a higher-energy conformer; the spectrum of the lowest-energy amide conformer is shown in addition in light gray in these cases.

The c3-ions of KAHAAAA and of KAHA likely are identical, which is indeed confirmed by their IR spectra (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). The computed spectra in the first and fifth row of Figure are therefore identical. Similarly, the c3-ions of KAAA and KAAHAAA are also the same as suggested by an overlay of their IR spectra in Figure S1; the computed spectra in Figure and on the third row of Figure are therefore identical.

For all structures, the preferred protonation site is the Lys side chain, except for the c4-ions of KAAHAAA and KAHAAAA, where protonation occurs on the n class="Chemical">His residue for the enol-imine isomers. The amide structure of KAHAAAA-c4 is also protonated at the His residue. Some enol-imine conformers converge to a structure where the proton has transferred from the Lys or His side chain to the imine nitrogen. As a consequence, their calculated spectra do not possess the typical NH bending modes. The match with the experimental spectra is poor, as shown in Figure S2, and we discard these structures.

All spectra feature prominent amide I (backbone n class="Chemical">amide carbonyl stretching around 1600–1700 cm–1) and amide II (backbone amide NH bending around 1500 cm–1) bands. The spectra in the 1400–1700 cm–1 range are generally well reproduced by the computed spectra for the amide isomers in blue except for some deviations in intensity for amide II in a few cases, as already noted for the NH2-capped Ala4 reference (Figure ). As for the c3 ion of KAAA in Figure , the lowest-energy conformer does not always provide the best match; for the c4-ions of KAAAAAA and KAAHAAA, the spectral match is better for higher-energy conformers, which we tentatively attribute to kinetic trapping.

As compared to the amide spectra, the calculated spectra for the n class="Chemical">enol-imine isomers qualitatively display more prominent deviations from experiment in the 1400–1700 cm–1 range, with for instance significant mismatches in the amide I band (e.g., KAH-c3, KAA-c3, and KAAH-c4) and the absence of the 1590 cm–1 band for KAAA-c4. Also at lower frequencies, amide spectra appear to provide an overall closer agreement than enol-imine spectra, with the general absence of the enol-imine NH and OH bending modes (*) in the experimental spectra as specific examples. The overall picture that emerges from the comparisons in Figure is that the amide isomer spectra provide the best match to the experimental spectra.

The enol-imine structures of interest here are between 51 and 100 kJ/mol higher in energy than the global minimum n class="Chemical">amide structures, which is in line with relative energies reported previously.[66,68,71,72] Although the IR spectra suggest an amide structure for all c-ions studied here, we cannot exclude the possibility that the amide structure is formed via an enol-imine intermediate, driven by the substantial gain in energy. The energetic barriers involved in such transformations have been investigated by transition-state (TS) calculations, and it appears likely that isomerization occurs before the incipient c- and z-fragments separate.[71,72] The charge-solvating behavior of the z-fragment in this predissociation ion–molecule complex lowers the barriers for the H-atom transfer and can be regarded as a catalyst for the isomerization.[71] The actual TS energies depend on the specific system but are in all cases much lower than the energy available from the charge recombination process.[73]

In conclusion, on the basis of our structural assignments from IR spectral matching in Figures and 3 and the corresponding computed relative energies, this study suggests that for a set of nine c-type ions, all most likely possess an n class="Chemical">amide C-terminus. Assuming the set of sequences selected for the precursor peptides is sufficiently diverse to be generally representative for a broader range of peptides, these results suggest c-type ions not having C-terminal amide groups would be unusual and that they generally are NH2-capped truncated peptides. One caveat may be the presence of a Lys residue in all systems studied here. On the basis of computational investigations, the ammonium group of a protonated Lys side chain was suggested to catalyze the enol-imine to amide tautomerization.[72] However, isolated cases of c-ions not including a Lys residue have been spectroscopically investigated and gave evidence for amide structures without exceptions.[66,67,74] The bottom line here is that the enol-imine structure was not encountered in any of the spectroscopic investigations thus far. These experiments do not exclude the possibility that enol-imine structures are traversed as reaction intermediates but may be regarded as experimental evidence for their efficient conversion to amide structures.[71,72]

Experimental and Computational Methods

IRMPD Spectroscopy. The experiments made use of a modified ion trap tandem mass spectrometer (Bruker AmaZon ETD Speed) coupled to the beamline of the IR free electron laser FELIX.[60] Doubly protonated peptide ions were generated using electrospray n class="Disease">ionization (ESI) from 10–6 M solutions in 50:50 acetonitrile:water with ∼0.5% formic acid. The doubly charged precursor ions of interest were mass isolated in the quadrupole ion trap. ETD was effected by admitting fluoranthene radical anions[38] to the trap reacting with the stored peptide cations for 300 ms. The basic Lys residue in the first position generates a prominent series of c-type ions, out of which the singly charged c3 or c4 ion of interest was mass isolated. Note that Lys is preferred over other basic residues such as Arg or His because of its relative silence in the IR spectrum, in contrast with the guanidinium and imidazolium side chains which feature strong IR absorptions overlapping with, and therefore obscuring, the diagnostic amide I and II features in the spectra. A potential side effect of this choice is the alleged catalytic behavior of the ammonium group in the conversion of enol-imine to amide structures.[72]

The c-type fragment ion was then irradiated with two IR pulses of the FELIX free-electron laser. FELIX produced 6 μs long macropulses of 20–60 mJ at a 10 Hz repetition rate having a bandwidth of ∼0.5% of the center frequency. The IR-induced dissociation yield, calculated as ΣI(fragment ions)/ΣI(parent + fragment ions), at each laser frequency was determined from five averaged mass spectra. Plotting the yield as a function of laser frequency then generates an infrared spectrum. The yield is linearly corrected for the frequency-dependent pulse energy, and the IR frequency is calibrated using a grating spectrometer.

Computational Chemistry. For all c-ions, enol-imine and n class="Chemical">amide isomeric structures were optimized, and their infrared spectra were calculated using DFT at the B3LYP/6-31++ G(d,p) level using Gaussian 09 revision D01.[76] These spectra were used for qualitative initial comparison with the experimental spectra. A molecular mechanics/molecular dynamics (MM/MD) approach employing AMBER 12(77) was then used to further search for lower-energy conformers of both isomeric motifs. Within AMBER, an initial MM geometry optimization was performed, followed by a simulated annealing procedure up to 273–500 K, resulting in 500 structures. These structures were grouped based on rms atom positions to give 20–30 candidate structures, which were optimized using DFT at the B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p) level. Their spectra were compared with the experimental spectra. Computed harmonic vibrational frequencies were scaled by 0.975 and convoluted with a 25 cm–1 full-width-at-half-maximum (fwhm) Gaussian line shape. Single-point electronic energies were calculated at the MP2/6-311+G(2d,2p) level using the B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p) optimized structures. The computational procedure is described in more detail elsewhere.[60,61,78]