| Literature DB >> 27277826 |
Jonathan Martens1, Josipa Grzetic1, Giel Berden1, Jos Oomens1,2.
Abstract
Tandem mass spectrometry occupies a principle place among modern analytical methods and drives many developments in the 'omics' sciences. Electron attachment induced dissociation methods, as alternatives for collision-induced dissociation have profoundly influenced the field of proteomics, enabling among others the top-down sequencing of entire proteins and the analysis of post-translational modifications. The technique, however, produces more complex mass spectra and itsEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27277826 PMCID: PMC4906228 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11754
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1The ETD MS/MS spectrum of [AAHAR+2H]2+ with the corresponding infrared spectra.
The infrared spectra of the ETD-generated fragments are shown in black/blue and that of the precursor peptide in black/grey. Supplementary Fig. 1 contains the comprehensive ETD MS/MS results.
Figure 2Dissociation scheme and notation used for product ions.
c- and z-type peptide fragments typically result from ETD MS/MS. Here we label only the discussed sequence ions from ETD of [AAHAR+2H]2+. Note that fragments carrying a ‘·' symbol are open-shell radicals and those without are closed shell.
Figure 3The infrared spectrum of [AAHAR+2H]2+ 263 m/z.
The experimental spectrum is presented in black and the spectrum of the assigned calculated structure from this study is shown in blue along with the structure and relative free energy at 298 K.
Summary of structural properties and relative free energies for selected calculated structures.
| His tautomer | Radical | Rel. Δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [AAHAR+2H+]2+ | 263 | |||
| I | — | — | +10.8* | |
| II | — | — | 0.0 | |
| z1·+ | 159 | |||
| I | — | α | +5.4* | |
| II | — | δ (Arg) | 0.0 | |
| III | — | β (Arg) | +10.1 | |
| IV | — | γ (Arg) | +14.7 | |
| z2·+ | 230 | |||
| I | — | α | 0.0* | |
| II | — | α | +10.2 | |
| III | — | δ (Arg) | +26.5 | |
| z3·+ | 367 | |||
| I | N3 | α | +22.4* | |
| II | N1 | α | 0.0 | |
| III | N3 | β (His) | 0.0 | |
| z4·+ | 438 | |||
| I | N3 | α | 0.0* | |
| II | N3 | α | +62.5 | |
| III | N3 | — | +54.4 | |
| IV | N3 | β (His) | +5.7 | |
| z3+ | 368 | |||
| I | N1 | — | +28.5* | |
| c4_I | — | — | — | |
| II | N3 | — | 0.0 |
Rel., relative.
An asterisk (*) indicates the structure assigned spectroscopically.
Figure 4The infrared spectra of the z1·+ and z4·+ fragments from ETD of [AAHAR+2H]2+.
The experimental spectra are presented in black in both cases and assigned calculated structures are shown in blue for (a) the z1·+ fragment and (b) the z4·+ fragment. The associated relative free energies (298 K) and structures are inlayed with the radical sites labelled by ‘·'.
Figure 5The infrared spectrum of the z2·+ fragment from ETD of [AAHAR+2H]2+.
The experimental spectrum is presented in black and is compared with computed spectra for different low-energy structures. (a) The calculated spectrum for the assigned structure is shown in blue. (b,c) The calculated spectra for structures disregarded on the basis of spectral mismatch are shown in red. Calculated structures and relative free energies (298 K) are inlayed for each plot.
Figure 6The infrared spectrum of the z3·+ fragment from ETD of [AAHAR+2H]2+.
The experimental spectrum is presented in black and is compared with computed spectra for different low-energy structures. (a) The calculated spectrum for the assigned structure is shown in blue. (b,c) The calculated spectra for structures disregarded on the basis of spectral mismatch are shown in red. Calculated structures and relative free energies (298 K) are inlayed for each plot.
Figure 7The infrared spectrum of the m/z 368 fragment from ETD of [AAHAR+2H]2+.
The experimental spectrum is presented in black and is compared with computed spectra for different low-energy structures. (a) The spectrum of the assigned calculated closed-shell z3+ structure is shown in blue with the structure and relative free energy (298 K) inlayed. (b) c4_I is a low-energy c4+ conformation and its calculated infrared spectrum is presented in red. (c) z3_II is the lowest energy calculated z3+ structure identified in this work.