Literature DB >> 30341539

The impact of the mesorectal apparent diffusion coefficient value on surgical difficulty in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Hirofumi Suzumura1, Masashi Tsuruta2, Hirotoshi Hasegawa1, Koji Okabayashi1, Takashi Ishida1, Yusuke Asada1, Akitsugu Makino1, Shigeo Okuda3, Yuko Kitagawa1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to clarify the impact of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of the mesorectum from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on surgical difficulty in laparoscopic anterior resection (Lap-AR) for rectal cancer.
METHODS: In total, 67 patients who had undergone curative Lap-AR for rectal cancer in our hospital from January 2008 to March 2015 and had preoperative MRI findings available were included. We randomly calculated the average ADC in three regions of the mesorectum at the level of the upper edge of the superior border of the femur. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation between the patients' clinicopathological characteristics, including the ADC value and short-term surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: The univariate analysis revealed that a lower ADC value was associated with a significantly increased operative blood loss (p = 0.008) and prolonged operative time (p < 0.001). The multivariate analysis adjusted for the body mass index, anal verge, tumor location, covering stoma, clinical T factor and conversion revealed that the ADC value was an independent risk factor for a prolonged operative time (R2 = 0.6003, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the multivariate analysis adjusted for the body mass index, anal verge, covering stoma, clinical T factor and conversion revealed that the ADC value was an independent risk factor for an increased blood loss (R2 = 0.4345, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: A lower ADC value of the mesorectum might be a predictor of surgical difficulty in Lap-AR for rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADC value; Laparoscopic surgery; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30341539     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1727-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  22 in total

Review 1.  Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Roland Bammer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Luca Gianotti; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Radaelli; Paola Gruarin; Paolo Dellabona; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Tumor microcirculation and diffusion predict therapy outcome for primary rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexander F DeVries; Christian Kremser; Patrick A Hein; Jürgen Griebel; Alfons Krezcy; Dietmar Ofner; Karl Peter Pfeiffer; Peter Lukas; Werner Judmaier
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  MRI in rectal cancer: the T stage and circumferential resection margin.

Authors:  R G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Evaluation of the technical difficulty performing laparoscopic resection of a rectosigmoid carcinoma: visceral fat reflects technical difficulty more accurately than body mass index.

Authors:  Y Seki; M Ohue; M Sekimoto; S Takiguchi; I Takemasa; M Ikeda; H Yamamoto; M Monden
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Education is the key to quality of surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  L A Mack; W J Temple
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H Lyng; O Haraldseth; E K Rofstad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Diffusion MRI for prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation.

Authors:  Andrzej Dzik-Jurasz; Claudia Domenig; Mark George; Jan Wolber; Anwar Padhani; Gina Brown; Simon Doran
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-07-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging.

Authors:  Regina G H Beets-Tan; Geerard L Beets
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Quality of surgery in T3-4 rectal cancer: involvement of circumferential resection margin not influenced by preoperative treatment. Results from EORTC trial 22921.

Authors:  Marcel den Dulk; Laurence Collette; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Corrie A M Marijnen; Gilles Calais; Laurent Mineur; Phillippe Maingon; Ljiljana Radosevic-Jelic; Alain Daban; Jean-Francois Bosset
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 9.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.