BACKGROUND: In general, visceral fat and adhesion greatly influence the technical difficulty in performing abdominal surgery. Body mass index (BMI) has been widely used to express the degree of obesity, but it does not always properly reflect the degree of visceral fat. This retrospective study investigated the impact of visceral fat on the operation time to examine whether a quantified visceral fat area (VFA) could be used as a sensitive predictor of technical difficulty in performing a laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma. METHODS: Between February 1999 and April 2004, 58 consecutive patients underwent a laparoscopically assisted sigmoidectomy or anterior resection. After a review of the medical charts, the relationship between the operation time and the following variables was analyzed: sex, depth of invasion, approach (medial-to-lateral, lateral-to-medial), subjectively graded degree of visceral fat and adhesion, history of previous abdominal surgery, and BMI. The correlations between VFA, VFA/body surface area (BSA) measured by the "FatScan," software package for quantifying the VFA from the preoperative CT images, and operation time were investigated. Next, the impact of the VFA amount on the early surgical outcome was examined. RESULTS: According to the intraoperative findings, two patients with a severe adhesion required a significantly longer operation time. A history of previous abdominal surgery was not a significant factor in the operation time. Instead, the VFA/BSA had a stronger correlation with the operation time than the BMI. A significantly longer operation time (209 +/- 42 vs 179 +/- 37 min; p = 0.031) was observed for the patients in the high VFA/BSA group (> or =85 cm(2)/m(2)) group than in the normal VFA/BSA group (<85 cm(2)/m(2)). CONCLUSION: For predicting the technical difficulty of performing a laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma, VFA/BSA may be a more useful index than BMI.
BACKGROUND: In general, visceral fat and adhesion greatly influence the technical difficulty in performing abdominal surgery. Body mass index (BMI) has been widely used to express the degree of obesity, but it does not always properly reflect the degree of visceral fat. This retrospective study investigated the impact of visceral fat on the operation time to examine whether a quantified visceral fat area (VFA) could be used as a sensitive predictor of technical difficulty in performing a laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma. METHODS: Between February 1999 and April 2004, 58 consecutive patients underwent a laparoscopically assisted sigmoidectomy or anterior resection. After a review of the medical charts, the relationship between the operation time and the following variables was analyzed: sex, depth of invasion, approach (medial-to-lateral, lateral-to-medial), subjectively graded degree of visceral fat and adhesion, history of previous abdominal surgery, and BMI. The correlations between VFA, VFA/body surface area (BSA) measured by the "FatScan," software package for quantifying the VFA from the preoperative CT images, and operation time were investigated. Next, the impact of the VFA amount on the early surgical outcome was examined. RESULTS: According to the intraoperative findings, two patients with a severe adhesion required a significantly longer operation time. A history of previous abdominal surgery was not a significant factor in the operation time. Instead, the VFA/BSA had a stronger correlation with the operation time than the BMI. A significantly longer operation time (209 +/- 42 vs 179 +/- 37 min; p = 0.031) was observed for the patients in the high VFA/BSA group (> or =85 cm(2)/m(2)) group than in the normal VFA/BSA group (<85 cm(2)/m(2)). CONCLUSION: For predicting the technical difficulty of performing a laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma, VFA/BSA may be a more useful index than BMI.
Authors: Anthony J Senagore; Hans J Duepree; Conor P Delaney; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: I Shimomura; T Funahashi; M Takahashi; K Maeda; K Kotani; T Nakamura; S Yamashita; M Miura; Y Fukuda; K Takemura; K Tokunaga; Y Matsuzawa Journal: Nat Med Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-04-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R Suzuki; S Watanabe; Y Hirai; K Akiyama; T Nishide; Y Matsushima; H Murayama; H Ohshima; M Shinomiya; K Shirai Journal: Am J Med Date: 1993-09 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Bradley J Champagne; Madhuri Nishtala; Justin T Brady; Benjamin P Crawshaw; Morris E Franklin; Conor P Delaney; Scott R Steele Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Aaron S Rickles; James C Iannuzzi; Oleg Mironov; Andrew-Paul Deeb; Abhiram Sharma; Fergal J Fleming; John R T Monson Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 3.452