Literature DB >> 30340196

Revising the index of watershed integrity national maps.

Zachary C Johnson1, Scott G Leibowitz2, Ryan A Hill3.   

Abstract

Watersheds provide a range of services valued by society, incorporating biotic and abiotic functions within their boundaries. Recently, an operational definition of watershed integrity was applied and indices of watershed integrity (IWI) and catchment integrity (ICI) were developed and mapped for the conterminous United States. However, these indices were originally derived using equally-weighted first-order approximations of relationships between anthropogenic stressors (obtained from the U.S. EPA's StreamCat dataset) and six watershed functions. In addition, the original calculations of the IWI and ICI did not standardize metrics across these differing scales, resulting in IWI and ICI values that are not directly comparable. We provide an example of how to iteratively update the stressor-watershed function relationships using random forest models and a nationwide response metric representative of one of the six watershed functions. Specifically, we focused on the chemical regulation function (CHEM) of IWI and ICI by relating a composite metric of chemical water quality from 1914 samples to land use metrics explicit to CHEM to refine the nature of these relationships (e.g., non-linear versus linear). The rate of nitrogen fertilizer, agricultural land use, and urban land use were found to be the three most important stressors predicting the national water quality response metric. Revision of CHEM values improved the prediction of several regional- to national-scale water quality indicators. In all cases, exponential decay curves replaced the original negative linear relationship for CHEM. Therefore, the original IWI and ICI values are probably over-estimates of the actual integrity of the Nation's watersheds and catchments. With these revisions, we provide updated national maps of IWI and ICI. The methods outlined here can be implemented iteratively as more and better data become available for all six of the watershed functions to elevate the accuracy and applicability of these indices to various land management issues.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropogenic stressors; Index of catchment integrity; Index of watershed integrity; Random forest models; StreamCat; Water quality

Year:  2018        PMID: 30340196      PMCID: PMC6469687          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  15 in total

1.  Ecology. Ecology for a crowded planet.

Authors:  Margaret Palmer; Emily Bernhardt; Elizabeth Chornesky; Scott Collins; Andrew Dobson; Clifford Duke; Barry Gold; Robert Jacobson; Sharon Kingsland; Rhonda Kranz; Michael Mappin; M Luisa Martinez; Fiorenza Micheli; Jennifer Morse; Michael Pace; Mercedes Pascual; Stephen Palumbi; O J Reichman; Ashley Simons; Alan Townsend; Monica Turner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality.

Authors:  Robert J Diaz; Martin Solan; Raymond M Valente
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Responses of benthic macroinvertebrates to environmental changes associated with urbanization in nine metropolitan areas.

Authors:  Thomas F Cuffney; Robin A Brightbill; Jason T May; Ian R Waite
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Landscape based identification of human disturbance gradients and reference conditions for Michigan streams.

Authors:  Lizhu Wang; Travis Brenden; Paul Seelbach; Arthur Cooper; David Allan; Richard Clark; Michael Wiley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  How novel is too novel? Stream community thresholds at exceptionally low levels of catchment urbanization.

Authors:  Ryan S King; Matthew E Baker; Paul F Kazyak; Donald E Weller
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management.

Authors:  James R Karr
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.657

Review 7.  Global consequences of land use.

Authors:  Jonathan A Foley; Ruth Defries; Gregory P Asner; Carol Barford; Gordon Bonan; Stephen R Carpenter; F Stuart Chapin; Michael T Coe; Gretchen C Daily; Holly K Gibbs; Joseph H Helkowski; Tracey Holloway; Erica A Howard; Christopher J Kucharik; Chad Monfreda; Jonathan A Patz; I Colin Prentice; Navin Ramankutty; Peter K Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.

Authors:  David Dudgeon; Angela H Arthington; Mark O Gessner; Zen-Ichiro Kawabata; Duncan J Knowler; Christian Lévêque; Robert J Naiman; Anne-Hélène Prieur-Richard; Doris Soto; Melanie L J Stiassny; Caroline A Sullivan
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-12-12

9.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.

Authors:  C J Vörösmarty; P B McIntyre; M O Gessner; D Dudgeon; A Prusevich; P Green; S Glidden; S E Bunn; C A Sullivan; C Reidy Liermann; P M Davies
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Freshwater as shared between society and ecosystems: from divided approaches to integrated challenges.

Authors:  Malin Falkenmark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  5 in total

1.  Consideration of spatial and temporal scales in stream restorations and biotic monitoring to assess restoration outcomes: A literature review, Part 2.

Authors:  Michael B Griffith; Michael G McManus
Journal:  River Res Appl       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 2.443

2.  Adapting the Index of Watershed Integrity for Watershed Managers in the Western Balkans Region.

Authors:  Kelsey B Aho; Joseph E Flotemersch; Scott G Leibowitz; Zachary C Johnson; Marc H Weber; Ryan A Hill
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  The coastal plain headwater stream restoration (CP-HStR) index: a macroinvertebrate index for assessing the biological effectiveness of stream restoration in the Georgia coastal plain, USA.

Authors:  D Eric Somerville; Gregory J Pond
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Applying the index of watershed integrity to the Matanuska-Susitna basin.

Authors:  Kelsey B Aho; Joseph E Flotemersch; Scott G Leibowitz; Matthew A LaCroix; Marc H Weber
Journal:  Arct Antarct Alp Res       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 0.735

Review 5.  Functional measures as potential indicators of down-the-drain chemical stress in freshwater ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Laura J Harrison; Katie A Pearson; Christopher J Wheatley; Jane K Hill; Lorraine Maltby; Claudia Rivetti; Lucy Speirs; Piran C L White
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.084

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.