Literature DB >> 20666256

Responses of benthic macroinvertebrates to environmental changes associated with urbanization in nine metropolitan areas.

Thomas F Cuffney1, Robin A Brightbill, Jason T May, Ian R Waite.   

Abstract

Responses of benthic macroinvertebrates along gradients of urban intensity were investigated in nine metropolitan areas across the United States. Invertebrate assemblages in metropolitan areas where forests or shrublands were being converted to urban land were strongly related to urban intensity. In metropolitan areas where agriculture and grazing lands were being converted to urban land, invertebrate assemblages showed much weaker or nonsignificant relations with urban intensity because sites with low urban intensity were already degraded by agriculture. Ordination scores, the number of EPT taxa, and the mean pollution-tolerance value of organisms at a site were the best indicators of changes in assemblage condition. Diversity indices, functional groups, behavior, and dominance metrics were not good indicators of urbanization. Richness metrics were better indicators of urban effects than were abundance metrics, and qualitative samples collected from multiple habitats gave similar results to those of single habitat quantitative samples (riffles or woody snags) in all metropolitan areas. Changes in urban intensity were strongly correlated with a set of landscape variables that was consistent across all metropolitan areas. In contrast, the instream environmental variables that were strongly correlated with urbanization and invertebrate responses varied among metropolitan areas. The natural environmental setting determined the biological, chemical, and physical instream conditions upon which urbanization acts and dictated the differences in responses to urbanization among metropolitan areas. Threshold analysis showed little evidence for an initial period of resistance to urbanization. Instead, assemblages were degraded at very low levels of urbanization, and response rates were either similar across the gradient or higher at low levels of urbanization. Levels of impervious cover that have been suggested as protective of streams (5-10%) were associated with significant assemblage degradation and were not protective.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20666256     DOI: 10.1890/08-1311.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  13 in total

1.  Juvenile river herring habitat use and marine emigration trends: comparing populations.

Authors:  Sara M Turner; Karin E Limburg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Comparison of fish and macroinvertebrates as bioindicators of Neotropical streams.

Authors:  Renata Ruaro; Éder André Gubiani; Almir Manoel Cunico; Yara Moretto; Pitágoras Augusto Piana
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Quantifying Urban Watershed Stressor Gradients and Evaluating How Different Land Cover Datasets Affect Stream Management.

Authors:  Nathan J Smucker; Anne Kuhn; Michael A Charpentier; Carlos J Cruz-Quinones; Colleen M Elonen; Sarah B Whorley; Terri M Jicha; Jonathan R Serbst; Brian H Hill; John D Wehr
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Revising the index of watershed integrity national maps.

Authors:  Zachary C Johnson; Scott G Leibowitz; Ryan A Hill
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Effects of management legacies on stream fish and aquatic benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages.

Authors:  Michael C Quist; Randall D Schultz
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Unified Multimetric Index for the Evaluation of the Biological Condition of Streams in Southern Brazil Based on Fish and Macroinvertebrate Assemblages.

Authors:  Renata Ruaro; Éder André Gubiani; Almir Manoel Cunico; Janet Higuti; Yara Moretto; Pitágoras Augusto Piana
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Integrating landscape disturbance and indicator species in conservation studies.

Authors:  Pedro Cardoso; François Rigal; Simone Fattorini; Sofia Terzopoulou; Paulo A V Borges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Landscape ecotoxicology of coho salmon spawner mortality in urban streams.

Authors:  Blake E Feist; Eric R Buhle; Paul Arnold; Jay W Davis; Nathaniel L Scholz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Stream macroinvertebrate response models for bioassessment metrics: addressing the issue of spatial scale.

Authors:  Ian R Waite; Jonathan G Kennen; Jason T May; Larry R Brown; Thomas F Cuffney; Kimberly A Jones; James L Orlando
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Shale gas, wind and water: assessing the potential cumulative impacts of energy development on ecosystem services within the Marcellus play.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Evans; Joseph M Kiesecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.