Literature DB >> 30339271

Mobile C-Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT imaging performance.

Niral M Sheth1, Wojciech Zbijewski1, Matthew W Jacobson1, Godwin Abiola2, Gerhard Kleinszig3, Sebastian Vogt3, Stefan Soellradl3, Jens Bialkowski3, William S Anderson4, Clifford R Weiss2, Greg M Osgood5, Jeffrey H Siewerdsen1,2,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Indirect-detection CMOS flat-panel detectors (FPDs) offer fine pixel pitch, fast readout, and low electronic noise in comparison to current a-Si:H FPDs. This work investigates the extent to which these potential advantages affect imaging performance in mobile C-arm fluoroscopy and cone-beam CT (CBCT).
METHODS: FPDs based on CMOS (Xineos 3030HS, 0.151 mm pixel pitch) or a-Si:H (PaxScan 3030X, 0.194 mm pixel pitch) sensors were outfitted on equivalent mobile C-arms for fluoroscopy and CBCT. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance included measurement of electronic noise, gain, lag, modulation transfer function (MTF), noise-power spectrum (NPS), detective quantum efficiency (DQE), and noise-equivalent quanta (NEQ) in fluoroscopy (with entrance air kerma ranging 5-800 nGy per frame) and cone-beam CT (with weighted CT dose index, CTDIw , ranging 0.08-1 mGy). Image quality was evaluated by clinicians in vascular, orthopaedic, and neurological surgery in realistic interventional scenarios with cadaver subjects emulating a variety of 2D and 3D imaging tasks.
RESULTS: The CMOS FPD exhibited ~2-3× lower electronic noise and ~7× lower image lag than the a-Si:H FPD. The 2D (projection) DQE was superior for CMOS at ≤50 nGy per frame, especially at high spatial frequencies (~2% improvement at 0.5 mm-1 and ≥50% improvement at 2.3 mm-1 ) and was somewhat inferior at moderate-high doses (up to 18% lower DQE for CMOS at 0.5 mm-1 ). For smooth CBCT reconstructions (low-frequency imaging tasks), CMOS exhibited ~10%-20% higher NEQ (at 0.1-0.5 mm-1 ) at the lowest dose levels (CTDIw ≤0.1 mGy), while the a-Si:H system yielded slightly (~5%) improved NEQ (at 0.1-0.5 lp/mm) at higher dose levels (CTDIw ≥0.6 mGy). For sharp CBCT reconstructions (high-frequency imaging tasks), NEQ was ~32% higher above 1 mm-1 for the CMOS system at mid-high-dose levels and ≥75% higher at the lowest dose levels (CTDIw ≤0.1 mGy). Observer assessment of 2D and 3D cadaver images corroborated the objective metrics with respect to a variety of pertinent interventional imaging tasks.
CONCLUSION: Measurements of image noise, spatial resolution, DQE, and NEQ indicate improved low-dose performance for the CMOS-based system, particularly at lower doses and higher spatial frequencies. Assessment in realistic imaging scenarios confirmed improved visibility of fine details in low-dose fluoroscopy and CBCT. The results quantitate the extent to which CMOS detectors improve mobile C-arm imaging performance, especially in 2D and 3D imaging scenarios involving high-resolution tasks and low-dose conditions.
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990CMOSzzm321990; zzm321990DQEzzm321990; zzm321990NEQzzm321990; zzm321990NPSzzm321990; C-arm; amorphous silicon; cone-beam CT; flat-panel detector; fluoroscopy; image-guided procedures; spatial resolution; technical assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30339271      PMCID: PMC6300145          DOI: 10.1002/mp.13244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications.

Authors:  L E Antonuk; K W Jee; Y El-Mohri; M Maolinbay; S Nassif; X Rong; Q Zhao; J H Siewerdsen; R A Street; K S Shah
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues.

Authors:  M Mahesh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  A framework for noise-power spectrum analysis of multidimensional images.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; I A Cunningham; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Antiscatter grids in mobile C-arm cone-beam CT: effect on image quality and dose.

Authors:  S Schafer; J W Stayman; W Zbijewski; C Schmidgunst; G Kleinszig; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise transfer characteristics of flat-panel cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Daniel J Tward; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Cone beam breast CT with a high pitch (75 μm), thick (500 μm) scintillator CMOS flat panel detector: visibility of simulated microcalcifications.

Authors:  Youtao Shen; Yuncheng Zhong; Chao-Jen Lai; Tianpeng Wang; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Modulation transfer function evaluation of cone beam computed tomography for dental use with the oversampling method.

Authors:  H Watanabe; E Honda; T Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Tungsten anode spectral model using interpolating cubic splines: unfiltered x-ray spectra from 20 kV to 640 kV.

Authors:  Andrew M Hernandez; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype.

Authors:  M J Daly; J H Siewerdsen; D J Moseley; D A Jaffray; J C Irish
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Active pixel imagers incorporating pixel-level amplifiers based on polycrystalline-silicon thin-film transistors.

Authors:  Youcef El-Mohri; Larry E Antonuk; Martin Koniczek; Qihua Zhao; Yixin Li; Robert A Street; Jeng-Ping Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of CsI:Tl and Gd2 O2 S:Tb indirect flat panel detector x-ray imaging performance in front- and back-irradiation geometries.

Authors:  Adrian Howansky; Anastasiia Mishchenko; A R Lubinsky; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of image quality and task performance for a mobile C-arm with a complementary metal-oxide semiconductor detector.

Authors:  Godwin O Abiola; Niral M Sheth; Wojciech Zbijewski; Matthew W Jacobson; Christopher Bailey; John Filtes; Gerhard Kleinszig; Sebastian K Vogt; Stefan Soellradl; Jens Bialkowski; William S Anderson; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Clifford R Weiss
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-01-24

3.  Characterization and potential applications of a dual-layer flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Linxi Shi; Minghui Lu; N Robert Bennett; Edward Shapiro; Jin Zhang; Richard Colbeth; Josh Star-Lack; Adam S Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A mobile isocentric C-arm for intraoperative cone-beam CT: Technical assessment of dose and 3D imaging performance.

Authors:  N M Sheth; T De Silva; A Uneri; M Ketcha; R Han; R Vijayan; G M Osgood; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  Real-Time 3D Imaging of Post-Transplant Biliary Stricture: A Novel Application of Existing Technology.

Authors:  Calvin Jianyi Koh; Chieh Sian Koo; Bhavesh Kishor Doshi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 12.045

6.  Technical evaluation of the cone-beam computed tomography imaging performance of a novel, mobile, gantry-based X-ray system for brachytherapy.

Authors:  Andre Karius; Marek Karolczak; Vratislav Strnad; Christoph Bert
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Quality assurance and long-term stability of a novel 3-in-1 X-ray system for brachytherapy.

Authors:  Andre Karius; Juliane Szkitsak; Vasilios Boronikolas; Rainer Fietkau; Christoph Bert
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.243

8.  Single-pass metal artifact reduction using a dual-layer flat panel detector.

Authors:  Linxi Shi; N Robert Bennett; Amy Shiroma; Mingshan Sun; Jin Zhang; Richard Colbeth; Josh Star-Lack; Minghui Lu; Adam S Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.506

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.