Literature DB >> 32347561

Characterization and potential applications of a dual-layer flat-panel detector.

Linxi Shi1, Minghui Lu2, N Robert Bennett1, Edward Shapiro2, Jin Zhang2, Richard Colbeth2, Josh Star-Lack2, Adam S Wang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dual-energy (DE) x-ray imaging has many clinical applications in radiography, fluoroscopy, and CT. This work characterizes a prototype dual-layer (DL) flat-panel detector (FPD) and investigates its DE imaging capabilities for applications in two-dimensional (2D) radiography/fluoroscopy and quantitative three-dimensional (3D) cone-beam CT. Unlike other DE methods like kV switching, a DL FPD obtains DE images from a single exposure, making it robust against patient and system motion.
METHODS: The DL FPD consists of a top layer with a 200 µm-thick CsI scintillator coupled to an amorphous silicon (aSi) FPD of 150 µm pixel size and a bottom layer with a 550 µm thick CsI scintillator coupled to an identical aSi FPD. The two layers are separated by a 1-mm Cu filter to increase spectral separation. Images (43 × 43 cm2 active area) can be readout in 2 × 2 binning mode (300 µm pixels) at up to 15 frames per second. Detector performance was first characterized by measuring the MTF, NPS, and DQE for the top and bottom layers. For 2D applications, a qualitative study was conducted using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom containing a porcine heart with barium-filled coronary arteries (similar to iodine). Additionally, fluoroscopic lung tumor tracking was investigated by superimposing a moving tumor phantom on the thorax phantom. Tracking accuracies of single-energy (SE) and DE fluoroscopy were compared against the ground truth motion of the tumor. For 3D quantitative imaging, a phantom containing water, iodine, and calcium inserts was used to evaluate overall DE material decomposition capabilities. Virtual monoenergetic (VM) images ranging from 40 to 100 keV were generated, and the optimal VM image energy which achieved the highest image uniformity and maximum contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was determined.
RESULTS: The spatial resolution of the top layer was substantially higher than that of the bottom layer (top layer 50% MTF = 2.2 mm-1 , bottom layer = 1.2 mm-1 ). A substantial increase in NNPS and reduction in DQE were observed for the bottom layer mainly due to photon loss within the top layer and Cu filter. For 2D radiographic and fluoroscopic applications, the DL FPD was capable of generating high-quality material-specific images separating soft tissue from bone and barium. For lung tumor tracking, DE fluoroscopy yielded more accurate results than SE fluoroscopy, with an average reduction in the root mean square error (RMSE) of over 10×. For the DE-CBCT studies, accurate basis material decompositions were obtained. The estimated material densities were 294.68  ±  17.41 and 92.14  ±  15.61 mg/ml for the 300 and 100 mg/ml calcium inserts, respectively, and 8.93  ±  1.45, 4.72  ±  1.44, and 2.11  ±  1.32 mg/ml for the 10, 5, and 2 mg/ml iodine inserts, respectively, with an average error of less than 5%. The optimal VM image energy was found to be 60 keV.
CONCLUSIONS: We characterized a prototype DL FPD and demonstrated its ability to perform accurate single-exposure DE radiography/fluoroscopy and DE-CBCT. The merits of the DL detector approach include superior spatial and temporal registration between its constituent images, and less complicated acquisition sequences.
© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dual energy CBCT; dual energy fluoroscopy; dual energy radiography; dual-layer; flat-panel detector; material decomposition; tumor tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32347561      PMCID: PMC7429359          DOI: 10.1002/mp.14211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  28 in total

1.  Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.

Authors:  S Cheenu Kappadath; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Scanning-beam digital x-ray (SBDX) technology for interventional and diagnostic cardiac angiography.

Authors:  Michael A Speidel; Brian P Wilfley; Josh M Star-Lack; Joseph A Heanue; Michael S Van Lysel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Prospective evaluation of dual-energy imaging in patients undergoing image guided radiation therapy for lung cancer: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Tracy Sherertz; Mark Hoggarth; Jason Luce; Alec M Block; Suneel Nagda; Matthew M Harkenrider; Bahman Emami; John C Roeske
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Performance characteristics of a real-time digital x-ray fluoroscopic system using an intensified charge injection device camera and CsI:Na crystal.

Authors:  N A Atari
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Kuo Men; Jianrong Dai; Xinyuan Chen; Minghui Li; Ke Zhang; Peng Huang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 6.  Dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Dual-energy mammography: initial experimental results.

Authors:  P C Johns; D J Drost; M J Yaffe; A Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Spectral imaging using clinical megavoltage beams and a novel multi-layer imager.

Authors:  Marios Myronakis; Rony Fueglistaller; Joerg Rottmann; Yue-Houng Hu; Adam Wang; Paul Baturin; Pascal Huber; Daniel Morf; Josh Star-Lack; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Accuracy of iodine quantification using dual energy CT in latest generation dual source and dual layer CT.

Authors:  Gert Jan Pelgrim; Robbert W van Hamersvelt; Martin J Willemink; Bernhard T Schmidt; Thomas Flohr; Arnold Schilham; Julien Milles; Matthijs Oudkerk; Tim Leiner; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  Virtual monoenergetic images from dual-energy CT: systematic assessment of task-based image quality performance.

Authors:  Davide Cester; Matthias Eberhard; Hatem Alkadhi; André Euler
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

2.  The markerless lung target tracking AAPM Grand Challenge (MATCH) results.

Authors:  Marco Mueller; Per Poulsen; Rune Hansen; Wilko Verbakel; Ross Berbeco; Dianne Ferguson; Shinichiro Mori; Lei Ren; John C Roeske; Lei Wang; Pengpeng Zhang; Paul Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Estimating the accuracy of dual energy chest radiography for coronary calcium detection with lateral or anteroposterior orientations.

Authors:  Scott S Hsieh; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.506

4.  Single-pass metal artifact reduction using a dual-layer flat panel detector.

Authors:  Linxi Shi; N Robert Bennett; Amy Shiroma; Mingshan Sun; Jin Zhang; Richard Colbeth; Josh Star-Lack; Minghui Lu; Adam S Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.506

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.