Literature DB >> 30324344

Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine: implication of inflammation-based scores.

Inhwan Hwang1, Jihoon Kang2, Hei Nga Natalie Ip1, Jae Ho Jeong1, Kyu-Pyo Kim1, Heung-Moon Chang1, Changhoon Yoo3, Baek-Yeol Ryoo4.   

Abstract

Background Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) is standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). However, prognostic factors for patients with mPC treated with AG, are largely unknown. We retrospectively identified prognostic factors, including inflammation-based prognostic scores, in patients with mPC, and recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with AG as first-line treatment. Method A total of 203 patients with histologically-confirmed recurrent or metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated with first-line AG in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between February 2016 and December 2016 were included in this analysis. As inflammation-based scores, baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and modified Glasgow prognostic scores (mGPS) were tested. Result Median age was 62 years and 116 patients (57%) were male. With median follow-up duration of 21.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 (95% CI 6.2-7.9) months, and overall survival (OS) was 15.1 (95% CI 12.6-17.6) months. In the multivariate analysis, PFS was significantly associated with liver metastasis (HR 1.43), distant lymph node metastasis (HR 1.48), and elevated CA19-9 (HR 1.56). In multivariate analysis for OS, elevated CA19-9 (HR 1.75), liver metastasis (HR 1.76), distant lymph node metastasis (HR 1.41), and high mGPS (mGPS ≥1 vs.0: HR 1.64) were independent prognostic factors. NLR and PLR were not significantly associated with PFS and OS. Conclusion Among the inflammation based prognostic scores, mGPS was a reliable prognostic indicator that could stratify survival outcomes in patients with recurrent or mPC who received AG as first-line chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Gemcitabine; Glasgow prognostic scores; Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; Pancreatic cancer; Platelet-lymphocyte ratio; Prognostic factor; nab-paclitaxel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30324344     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-018-0681-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  24 in total

1.  The Glasgow Prognostic Score is a good predictor of treatment outcome in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Mitsugi Shimoda; Masato Katoh; Junji Kita; Tokihiko Sawada; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.544

2.  The glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Marco La Torre; Giuseppe Nigri; Marco Cavallini; Paolo Mercantini; Vincenzo Ziparo; Giovanni Ramacciato
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  The value of the systematic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with gastric cancer: a literature review.

Authors:  Yongyin Gao; Dingzhi Huang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.805

5.  Prognostic factors of unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with nafamostat mesilate combined with gemcitabine chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kenei Furukawa; Tadashi Uwagawa; Ryota Iwase; Koichiro Haruki; Yuki Fujiwara; Takeshi Gocho; Hiroaki Shiba; Takeyuki Misawa; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  C-Reactive Protein Level Is an Indicator of the Aggressiveness of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Shuichi Mitsunaga; Masafumi Ikeda; Satoshi Shimizu; Izumi Ohno; Hideaki Takahashi; Hiroyuki Okuyama; Hideki Ueno; Chigusa Morizane; Shunsuke Kondo; Yasunari Sakamoto; Takuji Okusaka; Atsushi Ochiai
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

Authors:  Daniel D Von Hoff; Thomas Ervin; Francis P Arena; E Gabriela Chiorean; Jeffrey Infante; Malcolm Moore; Thomas Seay; Sergei A Tjulandin; Wen Wee Ma; Mansoor N Saleh; Marion Harris; Michele Reni; Scot Dowden; Daniel Laheru; Nathan Bahary; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Josep Tabernero; Manuel Hidalgo; David Goldstein; Eric Van Cutsem; Xinyu Wei; Jose Iglesias; Markus F Renschler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Evaluation of Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imaoka; Nobumasa Mizuno; Kazuo Hara; Susumu Hijioka; Masahiro Tajika; Tsutomu Tanaka; Makoto Ishihara; Tatsuji Yogi; Hideharu Tsutsumi; Toshihisa Fujiyoshi; Takamitsu Sato; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Yasumasa Niwa; Kenji Yamao
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2015.

Authors:  Kyu-Won Jung; Young-Joo Won; Hyun-Joo Kong; Eun Sook Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Clinical Implication of Inflammation-Based Prognostic Score in Pancreatic Cancer: Glasgow Prognostic Score Is the Most Reliable Parameter.

Authors:  Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Norimitsu Yabusaki; Kenta Murotani; Naoki Iwata; Mitsuro Kanda; Chie Tanaka; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prognostic Significance of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wen Fu; Kun Wang; Shan Yan; Xie Wang; Bo Tang; Jiang Chang; Ran Wang; Tao Wu
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  The prognostic value of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huan Zhang; Dianyun Ren; Xin Jin; Heshui Wu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.722

3.  Clinical Outcomes of Second-Line Chemotherapy after Progression on Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kyoungmin Lee; Kyunghye Bang; Changhoon Yoo; Inhwan Hwang; Jae Ho Jeong; Heung-Moon Chang; Dongwook Oh; Tae Jun Song; Do Hyun Park; Sang Soo Lee; Sung Koo Lee; Myung-Hwan Kim; Jin-Hong Park; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Baek-Yeol Ryoo
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 4.679

4.  Prognostic and clinical significance of modified glasgow prognostic score in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of 4,629 patients.

Authors:  Dongdong Wu; Xingmu Wang; Ge Shi; Honggang Sun; Guoxing Ge
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.682

5.  Real-world prognostic factors for survival among treated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kenneth H Yu; Muhammet Ozer; Paul Cockrum; Andy Surinach; Shu Wang; Bong Chul Chu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel versus Gemcitabine Alone in Older Adults with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Satoshi Kobayashi; Motoko Suzuki; Makoto Ueno; Yuta Maruki; Naohiro Okano; Akiko Todaka; Masato Ozaka; Kunihiro Tsuji; Kazuhiko Shioji; Keitaro Doi; Yasushi Kojima; Hidetaka Tsumura; Kazunari Tanaka; Hajime Higuchi; Ken Kawabe; Hiroshi Imaoka; Tatsuya Yamashita; Haruo Miwa; Hiroaki Nagano; Shiho Arima; Hideyuki Hayashi; Atsushi Naganuma; Hironori Yamaguchi; Terumasa Hisano; Kumiko Umemoto; Shuji Ishii; Koji Nakashima; Rei Suzuki; Yohei Kitano; Toshihiro Misumi; Junji Furuse; Hiroshi Ishii
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 5.837

7.  Prognostic value of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Prognostic Score in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Justin M Lebenthal; Junting Zheng; Paul A Glare; Eileen M O'Reilly; Andrew C Yang; Andrew S Epstein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Prognostic and predictive factors in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Emanuela Dell'Aquila; Claudia Angela Maria Fulgenzi; Alessandro Minelli; Fabrizio Citarella; Marco Stellato; Francesco Pantano; Marco Russano; Maria Concetta Cursano; Andrea Napolitano; Tea Zeppola; Bruno Vincenzi; Giuseppe Tonini; Daniele Santini
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-03-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.