Literature DB >> 26495775

Evaluation of Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Hiroshi Imaoka1, Nobumasa Mizuno, Kazuo Hara, Susumu Hijioka, Masahiro Tajika, Tsutomu Tanaka, Makoto Ishihara, Tatsuji Yogi, Hideharu Tsutsumi, Toshihisa Fujiyoshi, Takamitsu Sato, Yasuhiro Shimizu, Yasumasa Niwa, Kenji Yamao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) is known to be useful in determining the prognosis of cancers. However, the utility of mGPS for pancreatic cancer (PC) has been examined based primarily on a surgical series of early-stage cancers. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of mGPS for PC of all stages using a retrospective cohort design.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from a computerized database. A total of 807 patients with pathologically confirmed PC were analyzed (mGPS-0, n = 620; mGPS-1, n = 153; mGPS-2, n = 34).
RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) was significantly worse for the mGPS-1 group than for the mGPS-0 group (5.8 vs 15.8 months, respectively) but was comparable between the mGPS-2 and mGPS-1 groups (4.8 vs 5.8 months, respectively). After adjustment, both mGPS-1 and mGPS-2 were independent predictive factors of OS (mGPS-1: hazard ratio, 1.772; 95% confidence interval, 1.417-2.215; mGPS-2: hazard ratio, 2.033; 95% confidence interval, 1.284-3.219). Subgroup analysis showed that OS was significantly worse in the mGPS-1 and mGPS-2 groups than in the mGPS-0 group for all except the following 2 subgroups: localized disease and curative resection.
CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that the mGPS is an independent prognostic factor in patients with PC, especially for advanced-stage disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26495775     DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreas        ISSN: 0885-3177            Impact factor:   3.327


  24 in total

1.  Evaluation of inflammation-based markers for predicting the prognosis of unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Asama; Rei Suzuki; Tadayuki Takagi; Mitsuru Sugimoto; Naoki Konno; Ko Watanabe; Jun Nakamura; Hitomi Kikuchi; Mika Takasumi; Yuki Sato; Hiroki Irie; Takuto Hikichi; Hiromasa Ohira
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-08-10

2.  Prognostic Significance of the Preoperative Ratio of C-Reactive Protein to Albumin and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Gastric Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Yusuke Kono; Yuki Murakami; Yuji Shishido; Hirohiko Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Yoji Fukumoto; Tomohiro Osaki; Keigo Ashida; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Performance status and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are important prognostic factors in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Makoto Kadokura; Yasuaki Ishida; Akihisa Tatsumi; Ei Takahashi; Hiroko Shindo; Fumitake Amemiya; Shinichi Takano; Mitsuharu Fukasawa; Tadashi Sato; Nobuyuki Enomoto
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-12

4.  The preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is an independent prognostic marker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Fumihiro Terasaki; Teiichi Sugiura; Yukiyasu Okamura; Takaaki Ito; Yusuke Yamamoto; Ryo Ashida; Katsuhisa Ohgi; Katsuhiko Uesaka
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-05-15

5.  Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine: implication of inflammation-based scores.

Authors:  Inhwan Hwang; Jihoon Kang; Hei Nga Natalie Ip; Jae Ho Jeong; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Heung-Moon Chang; Changhoon Yoo; Baek-Yeol Ryoo
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Baseline immunity predicts prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients treated with WT1 and/or MUC1 peptide-loaded dendritic cell vaccination and a standard chemotherapy.

Authors:  Shuichi Ota; Mamiko Miyashita; Yuka Yamagishi; Masahiro Ogasawara
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Glasgow Prognostic Score is superior to ECOG PS as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal seeding.

Authors:  Shu-Qiang Yuan; Run-Cong Nie; Yong-Ming Chen; Hai-Bo Qiu; Xiao-Ping Li; Xiao-Jiang Chen; Li-Pu Xu; Li-Fang Yang; Xiao-Wei Sun; Yuan-Fang Li; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Shi Chen; Ying-Bo Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  The impact of cachexia and sarcopenia in elderly pancreatic cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Takeda; Takashi Sasaki; Chisaki Suzumori; Takafumi Mie; Takaaki Furukawa; Yuto Yamada; Akiyoshi Kasuga; Masato Matsuyama; Masato Ozaka; Naoki Sasahira
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Pretreatment C-reactive protein to albumin ratio for predicting overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  Junjie Hang; Peng Xue; Haiyan Yang; Shaobo Li; Donghui Chen; Lifei Zhu; Weiyi Huang; Shujuan Ren; Yue Zhu; Liwei Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Prognostic value of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Prognostic Score in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Justin M Lebenthal; Junting Zheng; Paul A Glare; Eileen M O'Reilly; Andrew C Yang; Andrew S Epstein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.