Literature DB >> 33406501

Prognostic and clinical significance of modified glasgow prognostic score in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of 4,629 patients.

Dongdong Wu1, Xingmu Wang1, Ge Shi1, Honggang Sun1, Guoxing Ge1.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the association of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) with prognosis in pancreatic cancer (PC) by performing a meta-analysis. Potentially eligible studies were shortlisted by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. A total of 4,629 patients with PC from 25 studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model or fixed-effect model according to heterogeneity. We pooled the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the association between mGPS and overall survival (OS). The results showed that elevated mGPS correlated with poor OS in patients with PC (HR=1.92, 95% CI=1.60-2.30, p<0.002). In addition, subgroup analysis indicated that increased mGPS remained a significant prognostic factor irrespective of the study design, region, disease status, treatment, survival analysis, cancer type, study center, or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score (all p<0.05). There was a significant correlation between higher mGPS and male gender (Odds ratio [OR]=1.30, 95% CI=1.01-1.67, p=0.038). Elevated pretreatment mGPS is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with PC. As an easily available and cost-effective inflammatory parameter, mGPS can serve as a promising tool for prognostication in PC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evidence-based medicine; meta-analysis; modified Glasgow Prognostic Score; pancreatic cancer; risk factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33406501      PMCID: PMC7835027          DOI: 10.18632/aging.202357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)        ISSN: 1945-4589            Impact factor:   5.682


  42 in total

1.  Significance of the inflammation-based prognostic score in recurrent pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Nakagawa; Masayuki Sho; Takahiro Akahori; Minako Nagai; Kota Nakamura; Tadataka Takagi; Toshihiro Tanaka; Hideyuki Nishiofuku; Chiho Ohbayashi; Kimihiko Kichikawa; Naoya Ikeda
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.996

2.  Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States.

Authors:  Lola Rahib; Benjamin D Smith; Rhonda Aizenberg; Allison B Rosenzweig; Julie M Fleshman; Lynn M Matrisian
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Modified Glasgow prognostic score might be a prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Nan Hu; Peng Chang; Tao Kang; Song Han; Yaoliang Lu; Maoquan Li
Journal:  Panminerva Med       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.197

Review 4.  The prevalence of cancer associated systemic inflammation: Implications of prognostic studies using the Glasgow Prognostic Score.

Authors:  Ross D Dolan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  A prospective comparison of the prognostic value of tumor- and patient-related factors in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nigel B Jamieson; Simon M Denley; Jennifer Logue; Douglas J MacKenzie; Alan K Foulis; Euan J Dickson; Clem W Imrie; Ross Carter; Colin J McKay; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Extensive Disease-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study in a Single Institute.

Authors:  Kei Sonehara; Kazunari Tateishi; Masamichi Komatsu; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Masayuki Hanaoka; Shintaro Kanda; Tomonobu Koizumi
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.544

8.  Prognostic value of the Glasgow prognostic score in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 9,839 patients.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Wanying Guo; Wei Xu; Xuelei Zhang; Zhijie Shi; Leizhen Zheng; Wenzhao Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Hu; Yan Wang; Wei-Xiao Yang; Wei-Chao Dou; Yan-Xiang Shao; Xiang Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Clinical Implication of Inflammation-Based Prognostic Score in Pancreatic Cancer: Glasgow Prognostic Score Is the Most Reliable Parameter.

Authors:  Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Norimitsu Yabusaki; Kenta Murotani; Naoki Iwata; Mitsuro Kanda; Chie Tanaka; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  2 in total

1.  Phase I trial of Bermekimab with nanoliposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Gong; Shant Thomassian; Sungjin Kim; Gillian Gresham; Natalie Moshayedi; Jason Y Ye; Julianne C Yang; Jonathan P Jacobs; Simon Lo; Nick Nissen; Srinivas Gaddam; Mourad Tighiouart; Arsen Osipov; Andrew Hendifar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectum Surgeons (TSCRS) Consensus for Anti-Inflammatory Nutritional Intervention in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Cheng-Jen Ma; Wan-Hsiang Hu; Meng-Chuan Huang; Jy-Ming Chiang; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Huann-Sheng Wang; Chien-Ling Chiang; Hui-Min Hsieh; Chou-Chen Chen; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.