Literature DB >> 33185861

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Following Trial of Labor After Two Previous Cesareans: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Ayala Hirsch1, Reut Rotem2, Hen Y Sela1, Arnon Samueloff1, Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky1, Misgav Rottenstreich1,3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of parturients attempting trial of labor (TOL) after two previous CD versus those who had an elective third repeat CD. A retrospective computerized database cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary center between 2005 and 2019. Various maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between parturients attempting TOL after two CD versus parturients opting for elective third repeat CD. TOL after two CD was allowed only for those who met all the criteria of our departments' protocol. Parturients with identified contraindication to vaginal delivery were excluded from the analysis. A univariate analysis was conducted and was followed by a multivariate analysis. A total of 2719 eligible births following two CD were identified, of which 485 (17.8%) had attempted TOL. Successful vaginal delivery rate following two CDs was 86.2%. Uterine rupture rates were higher among those attempting TOL (0.6% vs 0.1% p = 0.04). However, rates of hysterectomy, re-laparotomy, blood product infusion, and intensive care unit admission did not differ significantly between the groups. Neonatal outcomes following elective repeat CD were less favorable (specifically, neonatal intensive care unit admission and composite adverse neonatal outcome). Nonetheless, when controlling for potential confounders, an independent association between composite adverse neonatal outcome and an elective repeat CD was not demonstrated. In a subgroup analysis, diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were found independently associated with failed TOLAC. When following a strict protocol, TOL after two CD is a reasonable alternative and associated with favorable outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple cesarean deliveries; TOLAC; Uterine rupture; VBAC

Year:  2020        PMID: 33185861     DOI: 10.1007/s43032-020-00378-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  15 in total

1.  The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; Sharon Leindecker; Catherine Y Spong; John C Hauth; Steven Bloom; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?

Authors:  George A Macones; Alison Cahill; Emmanuelle Pare; David M Stamilio; Sarah Ratcliffe; Erika Stevens; Mary Sammel; Jeffrey Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Elizabeth Thom; John C Hauth; Steven L Bloom; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries.

Authors:  A B Caughey; T D Shipp; J T Repke; C M Zelop; A Cohen; E Lieberman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The management of labor in women with more than one uterine scar: is a repeat cesarean section really the only "safe" option?

Authors:  S Granovsky-Grisaru; M Shaya; Y Z Diamant
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.901

6.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  D A Miller; F G Diaz; R H Paul
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  More than one previous cesarean delivery: a 5-year experience with 435 patients.

Authors:  H Asakura; S A Myers
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.

Authors:  Ties Boerma; Carine Ronsmans; Dessalegn Y Melesse; Aluisio J D Barros; Fernando C Barros; Liang Juan; Ann-Beth Moller; Lale Say; Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor; Mu Yi; Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children.

Authors:  Jane Sandall; Rachel M Tribe; Lisa Avery; Glen Mola; Gerard Ha Visser; Caroline Se Homer; Deena Gibbons; Niamh M Kelly; Holly Powell Kennedy; Hussein Kidanto; Paul Taylor; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  VBAC: antenatal predictors of success.

Authors:  Giuseppe Trojano; Gianluca Raffaello Damiani; Claudiana Olivieri; Mario Villa; Antonio Malvasi; Raffaello Alfonso; Matteo Loverro; Ettore Cicinelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-09-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Trial of labor following cesarean in preterm deliveries: success rates and maternal and neonatal outcomes: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Reut Rotem; Ayala Hirsch; Rachel Michaelson-Cohen; Misgav Rottenstreich; Moshe Barg; Pnina Mor
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 2.  Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section: A structured review of the evidence on the associated outcomes for women and their children in high-income setting.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fitzpatrick; Maria A Quigley; Jennifer J Kurinczuk
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.