Literature DB >> 32175562

Inequalities in access to birth by caesarean section in the context of user fee exemption for maternal health services in southwest and north central Nigeria.

Anthony Idowu Ajayi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: User fee exemption for maternal healthcare services was introduced with a focus on providing free maternal health services, including caesarean sections (CS), in Nigeria. This policy has had a positive impact on access to facility-based delivery; however, the extent to which inequality in access to CS exists in the context of user fee exemption is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine inequalities in access to birth by CS 5 y after the implementation of the user fee exemption policy.
METHODS: Data were obtained from 1227 women who gave birth between 2011 and 2015 and were selected using cluster random sampling between May and August 2016 from two of the six main regions of the country. Adjusted and unadjusted binary logistic regression models were performed.
RESULTS: An overall CS rate of 6.1% was found, but varied by income, education and place of residence. Women who earned a monthly income of ≤20 000 naira (US${\$}$150) were 50% less likely to have a birth by CS compared with those who earned more. Compared with women who were educated to the tertiary level, women who had a secondary education or less were 51% less likely to give birth by CS.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that inequality in access to CS persists despite the implementation of free maternal healthcare services.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nigeria; caesarean section; free maternal healthcare; inequality

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32175562      PMCID: PMC8643432          DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihz118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Health        ISSN: 1876-3405            Impact factor:   2.473


  38 in total

Review 1.  Choosing caesarean section.

Authors:  M Wagner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-11-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Socioeconomic factors and cesarean section rates.

Authors:  R H Fabri; E F C Murta
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  Pregnant Nigerian women's view of cesarean section.

Authors:  I Sunday-Adeoye; C A Kalu
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in the setting of cesarean section in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Omrana Pasha; Sarah Saleem; Sumera Ali; Elwyn Chomba; Waldemar A Carlo; Ana L Garces; Nancy F Krebs; K Michael Hambidge; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Bhala Kodkany; Sangappa Dhaded; Richard J Derman; Archana Patel; Patricia L Hibberd; Fabian Esamai; Edward A Liechty; Janet L Moore; Dennis Wallace; Elizabeth M Mcclure; Menachem Miodovnik; Marion Koso-Thomas; Jose Belizan; Antoinette K Tshefu; Melissa Bauserman; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes after caesarean delivery in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  David Bishop; Robert A Dyer; Salome Maswime; Reitze N Rodseth; Dominique van Dyk; Hyla-Louise Kluyts; Janat T Tumukunde; Farai D Madzimbamuto; Abdulaziz M Elkhogia; Andrew K N Ndonga; Zipporah W W Ngumi; Akinyinka O Omigbodun; Simbo D Amanor-Boadu; Eugene Zoumenou; Apollo Basenero; Dolly M Munlemvo; Coulibaly Youssouf; Gabriel Ndayisaba; Akwasi Antwi-Kusi; Veekash Gobin; Patrice Forget; Bernard Mbwele; Henry Ndasi; Sylvia R Rakotoarison; Ahmadou L Samateh; Ryad Mehyaoui; Ushmaben Patel-Mujajati; Chaibou M Sani; Tonya M Esterhuizen; Thandinkosi E Madiba; Rupert M Pearse; Bruce M Biccard
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 26.763

6.  Socioeconomic factors differentiating maternal and child health-seeking behavior in rural Bangladesh: A cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Ruhul Amin; Nirali M Shah; Stan Becker
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2010-04-03

Review 7.  Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.

Authors:  Ties Boerma; Carine Ronsmans; Dessalegn Y Melesse; Aluisio J D Barros; Fernando C Barros; Liang Juan; Ann-Beth Moller; Lale Say; Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor; Mu Yi; Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Barriers to antenatal care use in Nigeria: evidences from non-users and implications for maternal health programming.

Authors:  Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe; Erhabor Sunday Idemudia
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Examining inequalities in access to delivery by caesarean section in Nigeria.

Authors:  Boniface Ayanbekongshie Ushie; Ekerette Emmanuel Udoh; Anthony Idowu Ajayi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why do women not use antenatal services in low- and middle-income countries? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Kenneth Finlayson; Soo Downe
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  The true costs of cesarean delivery for patients in rural Rwanda: Accounting for post-discharge expenses in estimated health expenditures.

Authors:  Anne Niyigena; Barnabas Alayande; Laban Bikorimana; Elizabeth Miranda; Niclas Rudolfson; Deogratias Ndagijimana; Fredrick Kateera; Robert Riviello; Bethany Hedt-Gauthier
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2022-05-08

2.  Rural-urban disparities in caesarean deliveries in sub-Saharan Africa: a multivariate non-linear decomposition modelling of Demographic and Health Survey data.

Authors:  Bright Opoku Ahinkorah; Richard Gyan Aboagye; Abdul-Aziz Seidu; Joshua Okyere; Aliu Mohammed; Vijay Kumar Chattu; Eugene Budu; Faustina Adoboi; Sanni Yaya
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 3.105

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.