Literature DB >> 35384469

Three-dimensional-printed titanium implants for severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty: short- and mid-term results.

Sheng Fang1, Yiming Wang1, Peng Xu1, Junke Zhu1, Jinbo Liu2, Huan Li3, Xiaoliang Sun4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Severe acetabular bone defect is challenging in revision hip arthroplasty. In the present study, we aimed to present new treatment options with the 3D printing technique and analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 3D-printed titanium implants for the treatment of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: A total of 35 patients with Paprosky type 3 bone defect and pelvic discontinuity (PD), who underwent hip revisions using 3D-printed titanium implants between 2016 and 2019 at our institution, were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-specific 3D-printed titanium augments and shells (strategy A) were used in 22 type 3A and two type 3B patients. Custom 3D-printed flanged components (strategy B) were used in 11 type 3B patients, including five PD. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Harris hip score (HHS). In addition, radiographic results were analyzed by the hip centre of rotation (V-COR and H-COR), implant failure, and survivorship.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 41.5 months (range, 16-62). The HHS was improved from 47.8 ± 8.2 pre-operatively to 78.1 ± 10.1 at one year follow-up and 86.4 ± 5.1 at the last follow-up (p < 0.01). Post-operative V-COR and H-COR of the operated side were 20.8 ± 2.0 mm and 30.2 ± 1.6 mm compared with 51.4 ± 4.1 mm and 33.9 ± 9.0 mm pre-operatively (p < 0.01). The complications included one dislocation and one partial palsy of the sciatic nerve. At the latest follow-up, no radiological component loosening or screw breakage was present.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed titanium implants showed satisfactory short- and mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes. It was an effective therapeutic regimen with a low rate of complications, providing a patient-specific and reliable strategy for the severe acetabular bone defect in revision hip arthroplasty.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Acetabular bone defect; Pelvic discontinuity; Revision hip arthroplasty; Titanium implant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35384469     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05390-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.479


  24 in total

1.  Use of jumbo cups for revision of acetabulae with large bony defects.

Authors:  Kenneth A Gustke; Melissa F Levering; Michael A Miranda
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Classifications in brief: Paprosky classification of acetabular bone loss.

Authors:  Jessica J M Telleria; Albert O Gee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Acetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Y Kosashvili; D Backstein; O Safir; D Lakstein; A E Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-07

4.  Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030.

Authors:  Matthew Sloan; Ajay Premkumar; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Mid-Term Results of Graft Augmentation Prosthesis II Cage and Impacted Allograft Bone in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hazem A H Hosny; Ahmed El-Bakoury; Helmy Fekry; Jonathan Keenan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  George W Fryhofer; Sireesh Ramesh; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-02

7.  Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Francesco Chiarlone; Andrea Zanirato; Luca Cavagnaro; Mattia Alessio-Mazzola; Lamberto Felli; Giorgio Burastero
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Clinical study of outcomes after revision surgery using porous titanium custom-made implants for severe acetabular septic bone defects.

Authors:  Giorgio Burastero; Luca Cavagnaro; Francesco Chiarlone; Andrea Zanirato; Lorenzo Mosconi; Lamberto Felli; Ferdinando Da Rin de Lorenzo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Survival Analysis of Allografting and Antiprotrusio Cage in Treating Massive Acetabular Bone Defects.

Authors:  Cheh-Yung Chang; Chen-Ta Wu; Husam Numan; Feng-Chi Kuo; Jun-Wen Wang; Mel S Lee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.

Authors:  Andrew M Schwartz; Kevin X Farley; George N Guild; Thomas L Bradbury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  1 in total

1.  Three dimensional printing as an aid for pre-operative planning in complex cases of total joint arthroplasty: A case series.

Authors:  Samuel Morgan; Juan Barriga; Solomon Dadia; Omri Merose; Amir Sternheim; Nimrod Snir
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.