Literature DB >> 16672867

Economic burden of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in Medicare enrollees.

K L Ong1, F S Mowat, N Chan, E Lau, M T Halpern, S M Kurtz.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The economic burden to Medicare due to revision arthroplasty procedures has not yet been studied systematically. The economic burden of revisions was calculated as annual reimbursements for revision arthroplasties relative to the sum total reimbursements of primary and revision arthroplasties. We evaluated this revision burden for total hip and knee arthroplasties through investigation of trends in charges and reimbursements in the Medicare population (Parts A and B claims from 1997-2003), while taking into account age and gender effects. Mean annual economic revision burdens were 18.8% (range, 17.4-20.2%) and 8.2% (range, 7.5-9.2%) for total hip arthroplasties and total knee arthroplasties, respectively. Procedural charges increased while reimbursements decreased over the study period, with higher charges observed for revisions than primary arthroplasties. Reimbursements per procedure were 62% to 68% less than associated charges for primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasties. The effect of age and gender on reimbursements varied by procedure type. Unless some limiting mechanism is implemented to reduce the incidence of revision surgeries, the diverging trends in reimbursements and charges for total hip and knee arthroplasties indicate that the economic impact to the Medicare population and healthcare system will continue to increase. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level II-1 (retrospective study). See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16672867     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214439.95268.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  60 in total

1.  Adenosine A2A receptor activation prevents wear particle-induced osteolysis.

Authors:  Aránzazu Mediero; Sally R Frenkel; Tuere Wilder; Wenjie He; Amitabha Mazumder; Bruce N Cronstein
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  The Application of Medicare Data for Musculoskeletal Research in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elham Mahmoudi; Sunitha Malay; Brianna L Maroukis; Tiana Sarsour; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Diagnosis of infected total knee: findings of a multicenter database.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Elie Ghanem; Peter Sharkey; Ajay Aggarwal; R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Impact of hospital volume on the economic value of computer navigation for total knee replacement.

Authors:  James D Slover; Anna N A Tosteson; Kevin J Bozic; Harry E Rubash; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The painful knee after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Becker; M Bonnin; S Hofmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  How are we addressing ligament balance in TKA? A literature review of revision etiology and technological advancement.

Authors:  Tyler Smith; Leah Elson; Christopher Anderson; William Leone
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-08-03

Review 7.  Current state of the art in total knee arthroplasty computer navigation.

Authors:  Frederic Picard; Kamal Deep; Jean Yves Jenny
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Customized implants for acetabular Paprosky III defects may be positioned with high accuracy in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Lena Witzmann; Jan Wieding; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz; Benjamin Craiovan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  A comparative study about the incidence of dislocation and peri-prosthetic fracture between dual mobility versus standard cups after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Anthony Viste; Yoann Blangero; Romain Desmarchelier; Michel-Henri Fessy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Predictors of hospital readmission following revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philip J Belmont; Gens P Goodman; Marina Rodriguez; Julia O Bader; Brian R Waterman; Andrew J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.