Karla L Hanson1, Jennifer Garner2, Leah M Connor2, Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts3, Jared McGuirt4, Raiven Harris2, Jane Kolodinsky5, Weiwei Wang5, Marilyn Sitaker6, Alice Ammerman7, Rebecca A Seguin2. 1. Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Electronic address: kh289@cornell.edu. 2. Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. 3. Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC. 4. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro, NC. 5. Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. 6. The Evergreen State College, Ecological Agriculture and Food System, Olympia, WA. 7. Gillings School of Global Public Health and School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Describe fruit and vegetable (FV) preferences and other factors that may influence participation in community-supported agriculture (CSA). DESIGN: In-depth, semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Eight rural/micropolitan communities in 4 US states. PARTICIPANTS: There were 41 caregivers and 20 children (8-12 years of age) from low-income, English-speaking households. PHENOMENA OF INTEREST: Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding FVs; perceived barriers to CSA participation. ANALYSIS: Transcribed verbatim and iteratively coded. RESULTS: Caregivers and children believed FVs were important to health, yet FVs were not featured in dinners or snacks and consumption was challenged by limited preferences and neophobia. Few caregivers and children knew about the seasonality of FV. Most caregivers were unfamiliar with CSA and had concerns about CSA cost, accessibility, produce quality, and selection. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These qualitative data support improvements in: 1) CSA distribution practices to offer flexible payment and pick-up options, more fruits, and self-selection of FV; 2) public awareness of produce seasonality and the CSA distribution model as necessary precursors to participation, and lower cost for low-income families who highlighted this barrier; and 3) capacity to prepare FV by enhancing skills and providing time-saving kitchen tools. Approaches to aligning CSA practices with the needs and preferences of low-income families warrant further research.
OBJECTIVE: Describe fruit and vegetable (FV) preferences and other factors that may influence participation in community-supported agriculture (CSA). DESIGN: In-depth, semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Eight rural/micropolitan communities in 4 US states. PARTICIPANTS: There were 41 caregivers and 20 children (8-12 years of age) from low-income, English-speaking households. PHENOMENA OF INTEREST: Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding FVs; perceived barriers to CSA participation. ANALYSIS: Transcribed verbatim and iteratively coded. RESULTS: Caregivers and children believed FVs were important to health, yet FVs were not featured in dinners or snacks and consumption was challenged by limited preferences and neophobia. Few caregivers and children knew about the seasonality of FV. Most caregivers were unfamiliar with CSA and had concerns about CSA cost, accessibility, produce quality, and selection. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These qualitative data support improvements in: 1) CSA distribution practices to offer flexible payment and pick-up options, more fruits, and self-selection of FV; 2) public awareness of produce seasonality and the CSA distribution model as necessary precursors to participation, and lower cost for low-income families who highlighted this barrier; and 3) capacity to prepare FV by enhancing skills and providing time-saving kitchen tools. Approaches to aligning CSA practices with the needs and preferences of low-income families warrant further research.
Authors: Manuel Franco; Ana V Diez Roux; Thomas A Glass; Benjamín Caballero; Frederick L Brancati Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-10-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Karla L Hanson; Leah C Volpe; Jane Kolodinsky; Grace Hwang; Weiwei Wang; Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts; Marilyn Sitaker; Alice S Ammerman; Rebecca A Seguin Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 5.717