| Literature DB >> 30300383 |
Ana C Klahr1, Mahesh Kate2, Jayme Kosior1, Brian Buck1, Ashfaq Shuaib1, Derek Emery3, Kenneth Butcher1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clot retraction in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has been described and postulated to be related to effective hemostasis and perihematoma edema (PHE) formation. The incidence and quantitative extent of hematoma retraction (HR) is unknown. Our aim was to determine the incidence of HR between baseline and time of admission. We also tested the hypothesis that patients with HR had higher PHE volume and good prognosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30300383 PMCID: PMC6177160 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Study profile.
Imaging characteristics (groups defined using absolute ICH volume change).
| Stable Hematoma | Hematoma Retraction | Hematoma Expansion | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HS; N = 90 | HR, N = 6 | HE, N = 40 | ||
| 2 (1, 3) | 2.5 (1, 3) | 1 (1, 2) | 0.121 | |
| 22 (18, 25) | 18.5 (13, 22) | 20.5 (14, 26.5) | 0.363 | |
| Deep | ||||
| Lobar | ||||
| Brainstem | ||||
| Cerebellum | ||||
| 8.67 (5.07, 15.48) | 7.03 (6.50, 27) | 31.44 (20.88, 55.91) | ||
| 28 (31%) | 6 (100%) | 13 (32%) | ||
| 0 (0, 1.62) | 4.73 (2.6, 5.7) | 0 (0, 2.65) | ||
| 9.58 (5.10, 19.68) | 14.33 (11, 29.6) | 31.88 (22.05, 57.69) | ||
| 9.35 (5.01, 18) | 8.26 (5, 24.4) | 56.47 (37.53, 87.72) | ||
| 0 (0, 2.40) | 0.94 (0.4, 2.40) | 1.63 (0, 7.94) | ||
| 11.20 (5.80, 22.84) | 10.21 (7.40, 24.80) | 58.62 (40.25, 98.33) | ||
| 2 (1.2, 3.9) | 1.7 (0.5, 3.3) | 7.8 (4.7, 13.4) | ||
| 0.25 (0.11, 0.52) | 0.21 (0.06, 0.32) | 0.14 (0.09, 0.27) |
avs. HS p<0.001
bvs. HE and HS p<0.006
cvs. HS and HR p<0.030
Baseline clinical characteristics and outcomes (groups defined using absolute volume change criteria).
| Stable Hematoma | Hematoma Retraction | Hematoma Expansion | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HS, N = 90 | HR, N = 6 | HE, N = 40 | ||
| 68 ± 13 | 68 ± 16 | 72 ± 14 | 0.165 | |
| 52 (58%) | 5 (83%) | 22 (55%) | 0.382 | |
| 10 (8, 15) | 11 (9, 15) | 15 (10, 20) | ||
| 181.8 (161, 202) | 174.3 (152, 191) | 173 (156, 194) | 0.474 | |
| 90.50 (81, 109) | 94.5 (87, 119) | 88 (75, 102) | 0.294 | |
| 20 (22%) | 2 (33%) | 4 (10%) | 0.261 | |
| 4 (4.8%) | 2 (40%) | 9 (25.7%) | ||
| 26 (30%) | 2 (33%) | 8 (21%) | 0.537 | |
| 7.30 (5.7, 8.5) | 7.20 (6.5, 8) | 7.20 (5.80, 8.30) | 0.842 | |
| 67 (75%) | 5 (83%) | 29 (74%) | 0.893 | |
| 20 (24%) | 2 (40%) | 7 (21%) | 0.597 | |
| 3 (2, 4) | 3 (3, 4) | 6 (4, 6) | ||
| 35 (56.5%) | 3 (60%) | 3 (11.1%) |
avs. HS p<0.0292
bvs. HE and HR p< 0.0356
cvs. HE and HS p<0.0342
Fig 2Example of HR in a patient with a left thalamic ICH and associated IVH.
Although the total hematoma volume decreased by 4.87 ml or 52.25%, the IPH component was stable. The apparent decrease was associated with a loss of measurable IVH (4.02 ml or 81.05%). The acute perihematomal edema (PHE) was 0.5 ml and the follow-up edema was 1 ml (indicated by the black arrows).
Predictors of hematoma retraction.
| Factors | OR [95% CI] | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Acute ICH volume | 0.99 [0.941, 1.061] | 0.980 |
| Symptom onset to acute CT | 0.93 [0.807, 1.071] | 0.310 |
| Symptom onset to 24 hour CT | 1.09 [0.578, 2.064] | 0.785 |
| Acute ICH volume | 0.92 [0.849, 1.003] | 0.059 |
| Symptom onset to acute CT | 0.82 [0.432, 1.550] | 0.538 |
| Symptom onset to follow-up CT | 1.06 [0.917, 1.230] | 0.425 |
Imaging characteristics (groups defined using relative ICH volume change).
| Stable Hematoma | Hematoma Retraction | Hematoma Expansion | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HS; N = 90 | HR, N = 8 | HE, N = 38 | ||
| 2 (1, 3) | 1.5 (1, 3) | 1 (1, 2) | 0.226 | |
| 22 (18, 25) | 22 (18.5, 28.5) | 23 (14, 26) | 0.363 | |
| 0.521 | ||||
| Deep | 57 | 7 | 26 | |
| Lobar | ||||
| Brainstem | ||||
| Cerebellum | ||||
| 10.55 (5.93, 30.13) | 7.03 (6.25, 8.33) | 18.95 (8.95, 30.50) | 0.070 | |
| 29 (29.01%) | 7 (87.5%) | 11 (28.9%) | ||
| 0 (0, 2.5) | 4.73 (2.2, 7.30) | 0 (0, 0) | ||
| 13.76 (6.80, 32.69) | 11.78 (8.61, 16.90) | 20.37 (10.00, 31.98) | 0.504 | |
| 10.06 (6.04, 30.80) | 7.06 (5.20, 8.67) | 38.39 (14.52, 70.10) | ||
| 0 (0, 3.46) | 0.94 (0.4, 3.90) | 0.50 (0, 3.60) | 0.310 | |
| 13.75 (6.90, 34.73) | 8.21 (6.27, 13.19) | 40.56 (14.70, 71.40) | ||
| 2.7 (1.2, 6.1) | 1.5 (0.7, 2.8) | 4.9 (2.5, 9.7) | ||
| 0.23 (0.11, 0.45) | 0.29 (0.08, 0.49) | 0.14 (0.10, 0.25) | 0.101 |
avs. HE p = 0.002
bvs. HE and HS p = 0.006
cvs. HS and HR p<0.022
Fig 3Top: Linear regression plot of normalized total ICH volume change and absolute PHE (R = 0.424, 95% CI [0.275, 0.553], p = 0.0001).
Bottom: Linear regression plot of normalized total ICH volume change and normalized PHE change (R = 0.425, 95% CI [0.276, 0.554], p = 0.0001) The solid diamonds represent HR patients by absolute (blue), percent (red), and both (black) criteria.
Baseline clinical characteristics and outcomes (groups defined using relative volume change criteria).
| Stable Hematoma | Hematoma Retraction | Hematoma Expansion | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HS, N = 90 | HR, N = 8 | HE, N = 38 | ||
| 69 ± 13 | 67 ± 14 | 71 ± 15 | ||
| 50 (55%) | 6 (75%) | 23 (61%) | ||
| 10 (8, 16) | 11 (10, 13) | 14 (10, 18) | ||
| 178.3 (159, 199) | 173.0 (148.5, 188.3) | 183 (158, 200) | ||
| 90.50 (82, 106) | 87.50 (80.75, 110) | 88 (76.5, 110) | ||
| 19 (21.6%) | 1 (12.5%) | 5 (13.2%) | ||
| 5 (6.1%) | 2 (28.6%) | 8 (22.9%) | ||
| 24 (27.6%) | 2 (25%) | 10 (26.3%) | ||
| 7.15 (5.75, 8.35) | 6.65 (6.25, 7.75) | 7.55 (5.85, 8.95) | ||
| 67 (76.1%) | 6 (75%) | 28 (73.7%) | ||
| 17 (21%) | 2 (28.6%) | 6 (18.2%) | ||
| 3 (2, 5) | 3 (3, 4) | 5 (3, 6) | ||
| 30 (50.8%) | 4 (66.7%) | 7 (24.1%) |
avs. HS p<0.025
bvs. HS and HR p<0.029