Allyson R Zazulia1, Tom O Videen, Michael N Diringer, William J Powers. 1. Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8111, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. zazuliaa@neuro.wustl.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The perihematomal hyperintensity (PHH) is commonly interpreted to represent cerebral edema following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but the accuracy of this interpretation is unknown. We therefore investigated the relationship between the changes in PHH and the changes in hemispheric brain volume as a measure of edema during the first week after ICH. METHODS: Fifteen individuals aged 66 ± 13 with baseline hematoma size of 13.1 ml (range 3-43) were prospectively studied with sequential MRI 1.0 ± 0.5, 2.6 ± 0.9, and 6.5 ± 1.0 days after spontaneous supratentorial ICH. Changes in hemispheric brain volume were assessed on MPRAGE using the Brain-Boundary Shift Integral (BBSI). Hematoma and PHH volumes were measured on T2-weighted images. RESULTS: Brain volume increased a small but statistically significant amount (6.3 ± 8.0 ml, 0.6 ± 0.7%) between the first and second scans relative to 10 normal controls (-0.9 ± 4.1 ml, P = 0.02) and returned toward baseline at the third scan (1.5 ± 9.5 ml vs. controls 0.9 ± 4.0 ml, P = 0.85). There were no significant differences in the volume changes between the two hemispheres at scan 2 or scan 3. At both scan 2 (P = 0.04) and scan 3 (P = 0.004), the change in PHH was significantly greater than and poorly correlated with the change in ipsilateral hemispheric volume. There were no significant correlations between the change in NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the change in PHH, ipsilateral, or total brain volume at scan 2 or scan 3 (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with small-to-moderate-sized hematomas, change in PHH was a poor measure of brain edema in the first week following ICH. A small degree of bihemispheric brain swelling occurred, but was of little clinical significance.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The perihematomal hyperintensity (PHH) is commonly interpreted to represent cerebral edema following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but the accuracy of this interpretation is unknown. We therefore investigated the relationship between the changes in PHH and the changes in hemispheric brain volume as a measure of edema during the first week after ICH. METHODS: Fifteen individuals aged 66 ± 13 with baseline hematoma size of 13.1 ml (range 3-43) were prospectively studied with sequential MRI 1.0 ± 0.5, 2.6 ± 0.9, and 6.5 ± 1.0 days after spontaneous supratentorial ICH. Changes in hemispheric brain volume were assessed on MPRAGE using the Brain-Boundary Shift Integral (BBSI). Hematoma and PHH volumes were measured on T2-weighted images. RESULTS: Brain volume increased a small but statistically significant amount (6.3 ± 8.0 ml, 0.6 ± 0.7%) between the first and second scans relative to 10 normal controls (-0.9 ± 4.1 ml, P = 0.02) and returned toward baseline at the third scan (1.5 ± 9.5 ml vs. controls 0.9 ± 4.0 ml, P = 0.85). There were no significant differences in the volume changes between the two hemispheres at scan 2 or scan 3. At both scan 2 (P = 0.04) and scan 3 (P = 0.004), the change in PHH was significantly greater than and poorly correlated with the change in ipsilateral hemispheric volume. There were no significant correlations between the change in NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the change in PHH, ipsilateral, or total brain volume at scan 2 or scan 3 (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with small-to-moderate-sized hematomas, change in PHH was a poor measure of brain edema in the first week following ICH. A small degree of bihemispheric brain swelling occurred, but was of little clinical significance.
Authors: James M Gebel; Edward C Jauch; Thomas G Brott; Jane Khoury; Laura Sauerbeck; Shelia Salisbury; Judith Spilker; Thomas A Tomsick; John Duldner; Joseph P Broderick Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Lauren H Sansing; Elena A Kaznatcheeva; Candice J Perkins; Eugene Komaroff; Frederick B Gutman; George C Newman Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Sebastian Urday; Lauren A Beslow; David W Goldstein; Anastasia Vashkevich; Alison M Ayres; Thomas W K Battey; Magdy H Selim; W Taylor Kimberly; Jonathan Rosand; Kevin N Sheth Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Sebastian Urday; W Taylor Kimberly; Lauren A Beslow; Alexander O Vortmeyer; Magdy H Selim; Jonathan Rosand; J Marc Simard; Kevin N Sheth Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Joseph Frantzias; Robert J Lee; Patrick D Lyden; Thomas W K Battey; Alison M Ayres; Joshua N Goldstein; Stephan A Mayer; Thorsten Steiner; Xia Wang; Hisatomi Arima; Hitoshi Hasegawa; Makoto Oishi; Daniel A Godoy; Luca Masotti; Dar Dowlatshahi; David Rodriguez-Luna; Carlos A Molina; Dong-Kyu Jang; Antonio Davalos; José Castillo; Xiaoying Yao; Jan Claassen; Bastian Volbers; Seiji Kazui; Yasushi Okada; Shigeru Fujimoto; Kazunori Toyoda; Qi Li; Jane Khoury; Pilar Delgado; José Álvarez Sabín; Mar Hernández-Guillamon; Luis Prats-Sánchez; Chunyan Cai; Mahesh P Kate; Rebecca McCourt; Chitra Venkatasubramanian; Michael N Diringer; Yukio Ikeda; Hans Worthmann; Wendy C Ziai; Christopher D d'Esterre; Richard I Aviv; Peter Raab; Yasuo Murai; Allyson R Zazulia; Kenneth S Butcher; Seyed Mohammad Seyedsaadat; James C Grotta; Joan Martí-Fàbregas; Joan Montaner; Joseph Broderick; Haruko Yamamoto; Dimitre Staykov; E Sander Connolly; Magdy Selim; Rogelio Leira; Byung Hoo Moon; Andrew M Demchuk; Mario Di Napoli; Yukihiko Fujii; Craig S Anderson; Jonathan Rosand Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 44.182