Literature DB >> 17365595

Analysis of PM2.5 using the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP).

Kenneth Davidson1, Aaron Hallberg, Donald McCubbin, Bryan Hubbell.   

Abstract

As epidemiological work from around the world continues to tie PM2.5 to serious adverse health effects, including premature mortality, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) has developed a number of policies to reduce air pollution, including PM2.5. To assist in the benefit-cost analyses of these air pollution control policies, the U.S. EPA has developed the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP). BenMAP is meant to (1) provide a flexible tool for systematically analyzing impacts of changes in environmental quality in a timely fashion, (2) ensure that stakeholders can understand the assumptions underlying the analysis, and (3) adequately address uncertainty and variability. BenMAP uses a "damage-function" approach to estimate the health benefits of a change in air quality. The major components of the damage-function approach are population estimates, population exposure, adverse health effects, and economic costs. To demonstrate BenMAP's ability to analyze PM2.5 pollution control policy scenarios, we assess two sample applications: (1) benefits of a national-level air quality control program, and (2) benefits of attaining two annual PM2.5 standards in California (annual average standards of 15 microg/m3 and 12 microg/m3). In the former, we estimate a scenario where control of PM2.5 emissions results in $100 billion of benefits annually. In the analysis of alternative standards, we estimate that attaining the more stringent standard (12 microg/m3) would result in approximately 2000 fewer premature deaths each year than the 15 microg/m3 achieves. BenMAP has a number of features to help clarify the analysis process. It allows the user to record in a configuration all of the choices made during an analysis. Configurations are especially useful for recreating already existing policy analyses. Also, BenMAP has a number of reporting options, including a set of mapping tools that allows users to visually inspect their inputs and results.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17365595     DOI: 10.1080/15287390600884982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  16 in total

1.  Monetized health benefits attributable to mobile source emission reductions across the United States in 2025.

Authors:  Philip Wolfe; Kenneth Davidson; Charles Fulcher; Neal Fann; Margaret Zawacki; Kirk R Baker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  The Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program - Community Edition (BenMAP-CE): A tool to estimate the health and economic benefits of reducing air pollution.

Authors:  Jason D Sacks; Jennifer M Lloyd; Yun Zhu; Jim Anderton; Carey J Jang; Bryan Hubbell; Neal Fann
Journal:  Environ Model Softw       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 5.288

3.  American Thoracic Society and Marron Institute Report. Estimated Excess Morbidity and Mortality Caused by Air Pollution above American Thoracic Society-Recommended Standards, 2011-2013.

Authors:  Kevin R Cromar; Laura A Gladson; Lars D Perlmutt; Marya Ghazipura; Gary W Ewart
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-08

4.  Application of an Original Wildfire Smoke Health Cost Benefits Transfer Protocol to the Western US, 2005-2015.

Authors:  Benjamin A Jones; Robert P Berrens
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Semi-volatile components of PM2.5 in an urban environment: volatility profiles and associated oxidative potential.

Authors:  Milad Pirhadi; Amirhosein Mousavi; Sina Taghvaee; Martin M Shafer; Constantinos Sioutas
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Association Between Outdoor Air Pollution Levels and Inpatient Outcomes in Pediatric Pneumonia Hospitalizations, 2007 to 2008.

Authors:  Alexander F Glick; Suzy Tomopoulos; Arthur H Fierman; Anne Elixhauser; Leonardo Trasande
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 7.  Preventing heat-related morbidity and mortality: new approaches in a changing climate.

Authors:  Marie S O'Neill; Rebecca Carter; Jonathan K Kish; Carina J Gronlund; Jalonne L White-Newsome; Xico Manarolla; Antonella Zanobetti; Joel D Schwartz
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Health benefits from large-scale ozone reduction in the United States.

Authors:  Jesse D Berman; Neal Fann; John W Hollingsworth; Kent E Pinkerton; William N Rom; Anthony M Szema; Patrick N Breysse; Ronald H White; Frank C Curriero
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Distributional benefit analysis of a national air quality rule.

Authors:  Ellen S Post; Anna Belova; Jin Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Population dynamics and air pollution: the impact of demographics on health impact assessment of air pollution.

Authors:  Esben Meulengracht Flachs; Jan Sørensen; Jakob Bønløkke; Henrik Brønnum-Hansen
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2013-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.