Literature DB >> 30295652

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants.

Ryan P M Hackländer1, Christina Bermeitinger2.   

Abstract

Information is retrieved more effectively when the retrieval occurs in the same context as that in which the information was first encoded. This is termed context dependent memory (CDM). One category of cues that have been shown to effectively produce CDM effects are odors. However, it is unclear what the boundary conditions of these CDM effects are. In particular, given that olfaction has been called an implicit sense, it is possible that odors are only effective mnemonic cues when they are presented in the background. This assertion seems even more likely given that previous research has shown odors to be poor cues during paired associate memory tests, where odors are in the focus of attention as mnemonic cues for other information. In order to determine whether odors are only effective contextual mnemonic cues when presented outside the central focus of an observer, an olfactory CDM experiment was performed in which odorants were presented directly, rather than ambiently. Direct presentation was accomplished with the aid of an olfactometer. The olfactometer not only allows for direct presentation of odorants, but provides other methodological benefits, including the allowance of trial by trial manipulations of odorant presentations and, relatedly, time-specific releases of odorants. The presence of the same odor during both encoding and retrieval enhanced memory performance, regardless of whether the odor was presented ambiently or directly. This finding can serve as a basis for future olfactory CDM research which can utilize the benefits of direct presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30295652      PMCID: PMC6235200          DOI: 10.3791/58170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  24 in total

1.  Odor recognition memory as a function of odor-naming performance.

Authors:  Robert A Frank; Konstantin Rybalsky; Melinda Brearton; Erica Mannea
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Differences in perception of everyday odors: a Japanese-German cross-cultural study.

Authors:  S Ayabe-Kanamura; I Schicker; M Laska; R Hudson; H Distel; T Kobayakawa; S Saito
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Olfactory stimuli as context cues in human memory.

Authors:  A Cann; D A Ross
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1989

4.  Long-term memory of odors with and without verbal descriptions.

Authors:  T Engen; B M Ross
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-10

5.  Olfactory Context-Dependent Memory and the Effects of Affective Congruency.

Authors:  Ryan P M Hackländer; Christina Bermeitinger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Emotion experienced during encoding enhances odor retrieval cue effectiveness.

Authors:  R S Herz
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1997

Review 7.  Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception.

Authors:  Richard L Doty; E Leslie Cameron
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-03-09

8.  Odor-context effects in free recall after a short retention interval: a new methodology for controlling adaptation.

Authors:  Takeo Isarida; Tetsuya Sakai; Takayuki Kubota; Miho Koga; Yu Katayama; Toshiko K Isarida
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-04

Review 9.  Time to smell: a cascade model of human olfactory perception based on response-time (RT) measurement.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-04

Review 10.  Smelly primes - when olfactory primes do or do not work.

Authors:  M A M Smeets; G B Dijksterhuis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.