Literature DB >> 9530967

Differences in perception of everyday odors: a Japanese-German cross-cultural study.

S Ayabe-Kanamura1, I Schicker, M Laska, R Hudson, H Distel, T Kobayakawa, S Saito.   

Abstract

There is a growing appreciation that experience with odors may strongly influence their perception. To further investigate this, the responses of 40 Japanese and 44 age-matched German women to everyday odorants were compared. Subjects were presented with 18 stimuli in squeeze bottles and asked to rate them according to intensity, familiarity, pleasantness and edibility, to describe associations elicited by them and, if possible, to name them. One-third of the odorants were presumed to be familiar to the Japanese only, one-third to the Germans and one-third to both populations. Significant differences were found between the two populations on all measures. Better performance by the Japanese in providing appropriate descriptors for 'Japanese' odorants and by the Germans for 'European' odorants supported the pre-selection of stimuli as culture-typical. Particularly clear differences between the two populations were found in pleasantness ratings. In general, a positive relationship was found between pleasantness and judgement of stimuli as edible, suggesting that culture-specific experiences-particularly of foods-may significantly influence odor perception. Somewhat unexpectedly, significant differences were also found between the two populations in intensity ratings for some odorants. These differences did not seem simply to be artefacts of the test situation and raise the possibility that experience may even influence such basic aspects of odor perception as stimulus intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9530967     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/23.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  30 in total

1.  Subconscious olfactory influences of stimulant and relaxant odors on immune function.

Authors:  Sokratis Trellakis; Cornelia Fischer; Alena Rydleuskaya; Sefik Tagay; Kirsten Bruderek; Jens Greve; Stephan Lang; Sven Brandau
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants.

Authors:  Ryan P M Hackländer; Christina Bermeitinger
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  The effect of verbal context on olfactory neural responses.

Authors:  Moustafa Bensafi; Ilona Croy; Nicola Phillips; Catherine Rouby; Caroline Sezille; Johannes Gerber; Dana M Small; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Predicting odor pleasantness with an electronic nose.

Authors:  Rafi Haddad; Abebe Medhanie; Yehudah Roth; David Harel; Noam Sobel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Semantic knowledge influences prewired hedonic responses to odors.

Authors:  Johan Poncelet; Fanny Rinck; Anne Ziessel; Pauline Joussain; Marc Thévenet; Catherine Rouby; Moustafa Bensafi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Accurate prediction of personalized olfactory perception from large-scale chemoinformatic features.

Authors:  Hongyang Li; Bharat Panwar; Gilbert S Omenn; Yuanfang Guan
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  What is a fresh scent in perfumery? Perceptual freshness is correlated with substantivity.

Authors:  Manuel Zarzo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Cognitive facilitation following intentional odor exposure.

Authors:  Andrew J Johnson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Positive relationship between odor identification and affective responses of negatively valenced odors.

Authors:  Lenka Martinec Nováková; Dagmar Plotěná; S Craig Roberts; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-11

10.  An olfactory demography of a diverse metropolitan population.

Authors:  Andreas Keller; Margaret Hempstead; Iran A Gomez; Avery N Gilbert; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.