Literature DB >> 30295070

Artificial Intelligence-Based Breast Cancer Nodal Metastasis Detection: Insights Into the Black Box for Pathologists.

Yun Liu1, Timo Kohlberger1, Mohammad Norouzi1, George E Dahl1, Jenny L Smith1, Arash Mohtashamian1, Niels Olson1, Lily H Peng1, Jason D Hipp1, Martin C Stumpe1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: Nodal metastasis of a primary tumor influences therapy decisions for a variety of cancers. Histologic identification of tumor cells in lymph nodes can be laborious and error-prone, especially for small tumor foci. OBJECTIVE.—: To evaluate the application and clinical implementation of a state-of-the-art deep learning-based artificial intelligence algorithm (LYmph Node Assistant or LYNA) for detection of metastatic breast cancer in sentinel lymph node biopsies. DESIGN.—: Whole slide images were obtained from hematoxylin-eosin-stained lymph nodes from 399 patients (publicly available Camelyon16 challenge dataset). LYNA was developed by using 270 slides and evaluated on the remaining 129 slides. We compared the findings to those obtained from an independent laboratory (108 slides from 20 patients/86 blocks) using a different scanner to measure reproducibility. RESULTS.—: LYNA achieved a slide-level area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of 99% and a tumor-level sensitivity of 91% at 1 false positive per patient on the Camelyon16 evaluation dataset. We also identified 2 "normal" slides that contained micrometastases. When applied to our second dataset, LYNA achieved an AUC of 99.6%. LYNA was not affected by common histology artifacts such as overfixation, poor staining, and air bubbles. CONCLUSIONS.—: Artificial intelligence algorithms can exhaustively evaluate every tissue patch on a slide, achieving higher tumor-level sensitivity than, and comparable slide-level performance to, pathologists. These techniques may improve the pathologist's productivity and reduce the number of false negatives associated with morphologic detection of tumor cells. We provide a framework to aid practicing pathologists in assessing such algorithms for adoption into their workflow (akin to how a pathologist assesses immunohistochemistry results).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30295070     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0147-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  54 in total

1.  Impact of pre-analytical variables on deep learning accuracy in histopathology.

Authors:  Andrew D Jones; John Paul Graff; Morgan Darrow; Alexander Borowsky; Kristin A Olson; Regina Gandour-Edwards; Ananya Datta Mitra; Dongguang Wei; Guofeng Gao; Blythe Durbin-Johnson; Hooman H Rashidi
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  Deep learning in histopathology: the path to the clinic.

Authors:  Jeroen van der Laak; Geert Litjens; Francesco Ciompi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 3.  Designing deep learning studies in cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Andreas Kleppe; Ole-Johan Skrede; Sepp De Raedt; Knut Liestøl; David J Kerr; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  AI in the treatment of fertility: key considerations.

Authors:  Jason Swain; Matthew Tex VerMilyea; Marcos Meseguer; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Utilizing Automated Breast Cancer Detection to Identify Spatial Distributions of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Han Le; Rajarsi Gupta; Le Hou; Shahira Abousamra; Danielle Fassler; Luke Torre-Healy; Richard A Moffitt; Tahsin Kurc; Dimitris Samaras; Rebecca Batiste; Tianhao Zhao; Arvind Rao; Alison L Van Dyke; Ashish Sharma; Erich Bremer; Jonas S Almeida; Joel Saltz
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  Applications of artificial intelligence multiomics in precision oncology.

Authors:  Ruby Srivastava
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence applied to breast pathology.

Authors:  Mustafa Yousif; Paul J van Diest; Arvydas Laurinavicius; David Rimm; Jeroen van der Laak; Anant Madabhushi; Stuart Schnitt; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Kurt A Schalper; David L Rimm; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence in Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies.

Authors:  Brie Kezlarian; Oscar Lin
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.319

10.  Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine as a strategic valuable tool.

Authors:  Andreas Larentzakis; Nik Lygeros
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.