Julie E Bauman1, Umamaheswar Duvvuri2, Sufi Thomas3, William E Gooding4, David A Clump5, Brian Karlovits5, Ahmad Wehbe6, Frank R Miller6, Seungwon Kim2, Malabika Sen2, Dwight E Heron5, Jennifer R Grandis2, Athanassios Argiris7. 1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Departments of Otolaryngology and Cancer Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Biostatistics Facility, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cetuximab combined with radiation therapy (RT) is an evidence-based treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); however, locoregional failure remains the primary cause of cancer-related death in this disease. Intratumoral injection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-antisense plasmid DNA (EGFR-AS) is safe and has been associated with promising lesional responses in patients who have recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. For the current study, the authors investigated the antitumor effects of cetuximab and EGFR-AS in preclinical HNSCC models and reported their phase 1 experience adding intratumoral EGFR-AS to cetuximab RT. METHODS: Antitumor mechanisms were investigated in cell line and xenograft models. Phase 1 trial eligibility required stage IVA through IVC HNSCC and a measurable lesion accessible for repeat injections. Patients received standard cetuximab was for 9 weeks. EGFR-AS was injected weekly until they achieved a lesional complete response. RT was delivered by conventional fractionation for 7 weeks, starting at week 3. Research biopsies were obtained at baseline and week 2. RESULTS: When added to cetuximab, EGFR-AS decreased cell viability and xenograft growth compared with EGFR-sense control, partially mediated by reduced EGFR expression. Six patients were enrolled in the phase 1 cohort. No grade 2 or greater EGFR-AS-related adverse events occurred. The best lesional response was a complete response (4 patients), and 1 patient each had a partial response and disease progression. EGFR expression decreased in 4 patients who had available paired specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In preclinical models, dual EGFR inhibition with cetuximab and EGFR-AS enhanced antitumor effects. In a phase 1 cohort, intratumoral EGFR-AS injections, cetuximab, and RT were well tolerated. A phase 2 trial is needed to conduct an extended evaluation of safety and to establish efficacy.
BACKGROUND:Cetuximab combined with radiation therapy (RT) is an evidence-based treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); however, locoregional failure remains the primary cause of cancer-related death in this disease. Intratumoral injection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-antisense plasmid DNA (EGFR-AS) is safe and has been associated with promising lesional responses in patients who have recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. For the current study, the authors investigated the antitumor effects of cetuximab and EGFR-AS in preclinical HNSCC models and reported their phase 1 experience adding intratumoral EGFR-AS to cetuximab RT. METHODS: Antitumor mechanisms were investigated in cell line and xenograft models. Phase 1 trial eligibility required stage IVA through IVC HNSCC and a measurable lesion accessible for repeat injections. Patients received standard cetuximab was for 9 weeks. EGFR-AS was injected weekly until they achieved a lesional complete response. RT was delivered by conventional fractionation for 7 weeks, starting at week 3. Research biopsies were obtained at baseline and week 2. RESULTS: When added to cetuximab, EGFR-AS decreased cell viability and xenograft growth compared with EGFR-sense control, partially mediated by reduced EGFR expression. Six patients were enrolled in the phase 1 cohort. No grade 2 or greater EGFR-AS-related adverse events occurred. The best lesional response was a complete response (4 patients), and 1 patient each had a partial response and disease progression. EGFR expression decreased in 4 patients who had available paired specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In preclinical models, dual EGFR inhibition with cetuximab and EGFR-AS enhanced antitumor effects. In a phase 1 cohort, intratumoral EGFR-AS injections, cetuximab, and RT were well tolerated. A phase 2 trial is needed to conduct an extended evaluation of safety and to establish efficacy.
Authors: David I Rosenthal; Paul M Harari; Jordi Giralt; Diana Bell; David Raben; Joyce Liu; Jeltje Schulten; Kian K Ang; James A Bonner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L Licitra; R Mesia; F Rivera; É Remenár; R Hitt; J Erfán; S Rottey; A Kawecki; D Zabolotnyy; M Benasso; S Störkel; S Senger; C Stroh; J B Vermorken Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: James A Bonner; Paul M Harari; Jordi Giralt; Roger B Cohen; Christopher U Jones; Ranjan K Sur; David Raben; Jose Baselga; Sharon A Spencer; Junming Zhu; Hagop Youssoufian; Eric K Rowinsky; K Kian Ang Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Lisa Licitra; Stephan Störkel; Keith M Kerr; Eric Van Cutsem; Robert Pirker; Fred R Hirsch; Jan B Vermorken; Anja von Heydebreck; Regina Esser; Ilhan Celik; Fortunato Ciardiello Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 9.162