Literature DB >> 26644536

Cetuximab and Radiotherapy Versus Cisplatin and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial.

Stefano Maria Magrini1, Michela Buglione2, Renzo Corvò1, Luigi Pirtoli1, Fabiola Paiar1, Pietro Ponticelli1, Alessia Petrucci1, Almalina Bacigalupo1, Monica Crociani1, Luciana Lastrucci1, Stefania Vecchio1, Pierluigi Bonomo1, Nadia Pasinetti1, Luca Triggiani1, Roberta Cavagnini1, Loredana Costa1, Sandro Tonoli1, Marta Maddalo1, Salvatore Grisanti1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: No randomized trials have been conducted to directly compare radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant cisplatin (CDDP) versus concomitant cetuximab (CTX) as first-line treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In this randomized trial, we compared these two treatment regimens in terms of compliance, toxicity, and efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either CDDP 40 mg/m(2) once per week or CTX 400 mg/m(2) as loading dose followed by CTX 250 mg/m(2) once per week concomitant to radical RT. For primary end points, compliance to treatment was defined as number of days of treatment discontinuation and drug dosage reduction. The acute toxicity rate was defined according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Efficacy end points were local recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival.
RESULTS: The study was discontinued early because of slow accrual after the enrollment of 70 patients. RT discontinuation for more than 10 days occurred in 13% of patients given CTX and 0% given CDDP (P = .05). Drug dosage reduction occurred in 34% given CTX and 53% given CDDP (difference not significant). Toxicity profiles differed between the two arms, with hematologic, renal, and GI toxicities more frequent in the CDDP arm, and cutaneous toxicity and the need for nutritional support more frequent in the CTX arm. Serious adverse events related to treatment, including four versus one toxic deaths, were higher in the CTX arm (19% v 3%, P = .044). Locoregional control, patterns of failure, and survivals were similar between the treatment arms.
CONCLUSION: CTX concomitant to RT lowered compliance and increased acute toxicity rates. Efficacy outcomes were similar in both arms. These results raise the issue of appropriately selecting patients with head and neck cancer who can benefit from CTX in combination with RT.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26644536     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  65 in total

1.  Drug therapy: Cetuximab or cisplatin in HNSCC?

Authors:  Lisa Hutchinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Paired phase II trials evaluating cetuximab and radiotherapy for low risk HPV associated oropharyngeal cancer and locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in patients not eligible for cisplatin.

Authors:  Paul L Swiecicki; Pin Li; Emily Bellile; Chaz Stucken; Kelly Malloy; Andrew Shuman; Matthew E Spector; Steven Chinn; Keith Casper; Scott McLean; Jeffery Moyer; Douglas Chepeha; Gregory T Wolf; Mark Prince; Carol Bradford; Mukesh Nyati; Avraham Eisbruch; Francis P Worden; Shruti Jolly; Michelle Mierzwa
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Targeted nanoparticles for tumour radiotherapy enhancement-the long dawn of a golden era?

Authors:  Elisabetta Gargioni; Florian Schulz; Annette Raabe; Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm; Thorsten Rieckmann; Kai Rothkamm
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

4.  Head and neck cancer in 2016: A watershed year for improvements in treatment?

Authors:  Alain P Algazi; Jennifer R Grandis
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Radiotherapy for elderly patients and cetuximab, a monocentric study.

Authors:  Alexander T Falk; Christophe Hébert; Antoine Tran; Marie-Eve Chand; Axel Leysalle; Juliette Thariat; Olivier Dassonville; Gilles Poissonnet; Alexandre Bozec; Esma Saada; Fréderic Peyrade; Karen Benezery
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  A comparison of concurrent cisplatin versus cetuximab with radiotherapy in locally-advanced head and neck cancer: A bi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  William A Stokes; Whitney A Sumner; Kiersten L Breggren; John T Rathbun; David Raben; Jessica D McDermott; Gregory Gan; Sana D Karam
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-08-02

7.  The impact of cumulative dose of cisplatin on outcome of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  A Al-Mamgani; M de Ridder; A Navran; W M Klop; J P de Boer; M E Tesselaar
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  The SCOPE of definitive chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer: what direction for the future?

Authors:  Gilles Créhange; Thierry Conroy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  CONCERT-1, an additional piece in the puzzle of (bio)-(chemo)-radiation.

Authors:  Pol Specenier; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-11

10.  De-Escalation Strategies in HPV-Associated Oropharynx Cancer-Are we Putting the Cart Before the Horse?

Authors:  Carryn M Anderson; Randall J Kimple; Alexander Lin; Sana D Karam; Danielle N Margalit; Melvin L K Chua
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.