David I Rosenthal1, Paul M Harari1, Jordi Giralt1, Diana Bell1, David Raben1, Joyce Liu1, Jeltje Schulten1, Kian K Ang1, James A Bonner2. 1. David I. Rosenthal, Diana Bell, and Kian K. Ang, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Paul M. Harari, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Jordi Giralt, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; David Raben, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Joyce Liu, Merck Serono, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Jeltje Schulten, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; and James A. Bonner, University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL. 2. David I. Rosenthal, Diana Bell, and Kian K. Ang, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Paul M. Harari, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Jordi Giralt, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; David Raben, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Joyce Liu, Merck Serono, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Jeltje Schulten, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; and James A. Bonner, University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL. jabonner@uabmc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the IMCL-9815 study to examine the association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and p16 protein expression status with outcomes in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) receiving radiotherapy (RT) plus cetuximab or RT alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the IMCL-9815 study, patients were randomly allocated to receive RT plus weekly cetuximab or RT alone. A subpopulation of patients with p16-evaluable OPC was retrospectively evaluated on the basis of locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Evaluable samples from patients with p16-positive OPC were also tested for HPV DNA. RESULTS: Tumor p16 status was evaluable in 182 patients with OPC enrolled in the IMCL-9815 study; 41% were p16 positive. When treated with RT alone or RT plus cetuximab, p16-positive patients had a longer OS than p16-negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.74 and hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.36, respectively). The addition of cetuximab to RT increased LRC, OS, and PFS in both patients with p16-positive OPC and those with p16-negative disease. Interaction tests for LRC, OS, and PFS did not demonstrate any significant interaction between p16 status and treatment effect (P = .087, .085, and .253, respectively). Similar trends were observed when patients with p16-positive/HPV-positive OPC (n = 49) and those with p16-positive/HPV-negative OPC (n = 14) were compared. CONCLUSION: p16 status was strongly prognostic for patients with OPC. The data suggest that the addition of cetuximab to RT improved clinical outcomes regardless of p16 or HPV status versus RT alone.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the IMCL-9815 study to examine the association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and p16 protein expression status with outcomes in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) receiving radiotherapy (RT) plus cetuximab or RT alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the IMCL-9815 study, patients were randomly allocated to receive RT plus weekly cetuximab or RT alone. A subpopulation of patients with p16-evaluable OPC was retrospectively evaluated on the basis of locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Evaluable samples from patients with p16-positive OPC were also tested for HPV DNA. RESULTS: Tumor p16 status was evaluable in 182 patients with OPC enrolled in the IMCL-9815 study; 41% were p16 positive. When treated with RT alone or RT plus cetuximab, p16-positive patients had a longer OS than p16-negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.74 and hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.36, respectively). The addition of cetuximab to RT increased LRC, OS, and PFS in both patients with p16-positive OPC and those with p16-negative disease. Interaction tests for LRC, OS, and PFS did not demonstrate any significant interaction between p16 status and treatment effect (P = .087, .085, and .253, respectively). Similar trends were observed when patients with p16-positive/HPV-positive OPC (n = 49) and those with p16-positive/HPV-negative OPC (n = 14) were compared. CONCLUSION:p16 status was strongly prognostic for patients with OPC. The data suggest that the addition of cetuximab to RT improved clinical outcomes regardless of p16 or HPV status versus RT alone.
Authors: Hisham Mehanna; Tom Beech; Tom Nicholson; Iman El-Hariry; Christopher McConkey; Vinidh Paleri; Sally Roberts Journal: Head Neck Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Anil K Chaturvedi; Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Brenda Y Hernandez; Weihong Xiao; Esther Kim; Bo Jiang; Marc T Goodman; Maria Sibug-Saber; Wendy Cozen; Lihua Liu; Charles F Lynch; Nicolas Wentzensen; Richard C Jordan; Sean Altekruse; William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Maura L Gillison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jan B Vermorken; Jan Stöhlmacher-Williams; Irina Davidenko; Lisa Licitra; Eric Winquist; Cristian Villanueva; Paolo Foa; Sylvie Rottey; Krzysztof Skladowski; Makoto Tahara; Vasant R Pai; Sandrine Faivre; Cesar R Blajman; Arlene A Forastiere; Brian N Stein; Kelly S Oliner; Zhiying Pan; Bruce A Bach Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jean Bourhis; Jens Overgaard; Hélène Audry; Kian K Ang; Michele Saunders; Jacques Bernier; Jean-Claude Horiot; Aurélie Le Maître; Thomas F Pajak; Michael G Poulsen; Brian O'Sullivan; Werner Dobrowsky; Andrzej Hliniak; Krzysztof Skladowski; John H Hay; Luiz H J Pinto; Carlo Fallai; Karen K Fu; Richard Sylvester; Jean-Pierre Pignon Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-09-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Danny Rischin; Richard J Young; Richard Fisher; Stephen B Fox; Quynh-Thu Le; Lester J Peters; Ben Solomon; Jimin Choi; Brian O'Sullivan; Lizbeth M Kenny; Grant A McArthur Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-08-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jean-Pierre Pignon; Nathalie Syz; Marshall Posner; Robert Olivares; Laurence Le Lann; Antoine Yver; Ariane Dunant; Freddi Lewin; David N Dalley; Adriano Paccagnella; Samuel G Taylor; Christian Domenge; Jean Bourhis; Madhu Mazumdar Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: D M Brizel; M E Albers; S R Fisher; R L Scher; W J Richtsmeier; V Hars; S L George; A T Huang; L R Prosnitz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-06-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul L Swiecicki; Pin Li; Emily Bellile; Chaz Stucken; Kelly Malloy; Andrew Shuman; Matthew E Spector; Steven Chinn; Keith Casper; Scott McLean; Jeffery Moyer; Douglas Chepeha; Gregory T Wolf; Mark Prince; Carol Bradford; Mukesh Nyati; Avraham Eisbruch; Francis P Worden; Shruti Jolly; Michelle Mierzwa Journal: Head Neck Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Thomas Kuhnt; Andreas Schreiber; Anett Pirnasch; Matthias G Hautmann; Peter Hass; Frank P Sieker; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Michael Richter; Kathrin Dellas; Jürgen Dunst Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 3.621