Literature DB >> 30280080

Radiologic Analysis of C2 to Predict Safe Placement of Pedicle Screws.

Rex A W Marco1,2, Christopher I Phelps2, Rebecca C Kuo2, W U Zhuge2, Clinton W Howard2, Vivek P Kushwaha2, Derek T Bernstein1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative assessment of C2 pedicle morphology is critical to safe pedicle screw placement. To avoid iatrogenic injury, complex digital templating software has been introduced; however, this technology may not be available in many centers. We report a technique for preoperative assessment of C2 pedicle screw placement safety based upon 2-dimensional sagittal computed tomography (CT) scan images and verify its utility in clinical practice.
METHODS: A total of 46 consecutive patients underwent cervical spine CT scans between 2005 and 2011. The C2 pedicle morphology was assessed on sagittal CT imaging by 5 independent reviewers to determine the feasibility and risk associated with pedicle screw placement. Thirty consecutive patients underwent C2 pedicle screw placement and were followed clinically for a minimum of 2 years. The ability to place a screw was noted, and accuracy of screw placement was assessed postoperatively by CT scan.
RESULTS: The CT scan analysis demonstrated that 11% (5/46) of patients had sufficient pedicle size bilaterally to allow safe placement of long pedicle screws with a low risk of vertebral artery injury, whereas 15% (7/46) were considered a high risk bilaterally. Screw placement was deemed low risk in 28%, moderate risk in 38%, and high risk in 34%. Excellent intraobserver reliability and good interobserver reliability was observed. Clinically, 18 of 20 (90%) low-risk and 21 of 24 (88%) moderate-risk pedicle screws were placed safely versus 5 of 16 (31%) high-risk pedicle screws (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Using the described technique for evaluating the C2 pedicle via sagittal CT scan images allows for safe and reliable pedicle screw placement without relying upon complex digital templating software, which may have limited availability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study aids in the surgical decision-making behind the placement of C2 pedicle screws using CT scans without reliance upon complex digital templating software.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C2 pedicle; CT scan; high-riding vertebral artery; pedicle screw; vertebral artery; vertebral artery injury

Year:  2018        PMID: 30280080      PMCID: PMC6162039          DOI: 10.14444/5006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of the anatomical risk for vertebral artery injury associated with the C2-pedicle screw and atlantoaxial transarticular screw.

Authors:  Makoto Yoshida; Masashi Neo; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Variation of the groove in the axis vertebra for the vertebral artery. Implications for instrumentation.

Authors:  A Abou Madawi; G Solanki; A T Casey; H A Crockard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-09

3.  Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement.

Authors:  Nupur Pruthi; Rose Dawn; Yogitha Ravindranath; Tanmoy Kumar Maiti; Roopa Ravindranath; Mariamma Philip
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Morphologic considerations of C2 isthmus dimensions for the placement of transarticular screws.

Authors:  I M Mandel; B J Kambach; C A Petersilge; B Johnstone; J U Yoo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Radiological and anatomical evaluation of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique.

Authors:  A A Madawi; A T Casey; G A Solanki; G Tuite; R Veres; H A Crockard
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Peroperative determination of safe superior transarticular screw trajectory through the lateral mass.

Authors:  G A Solanki; H A Crockard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The anatomical suitability of the C1-2 complex for transarticular screw fixation.

Authors:  C G Paramore; C A Dickman; V K Sonntag
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  John M Rhee; Chaiwat Kraiwattanapong; William C Hutton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation.

Authors:  J Harms; R P Melcher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Anatomic suitability of the C1-C2 complex for pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Daniel K Resnick; Samir Lapsiwala; Gregory R Trost
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  A biomechanical comparison of crossed and parallel rod configurations in atlantoaxial internal fixation.

Authors:  Feng Qiu; Xiao-Bao Zou; Xi-Lin Xu; Wei-Cheng Jiang; Geng-Chao Liu; Xiang-Yang Ma
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analyzing parsicle screws as a viable alternative to pars screws and pedicle screws for C2 posterior instrumentation fixation.

Authors:  Eric Dilbone; Rishabh Gupta; Byron Stephens
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-15

3.  Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Sadeghi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.