Patrícia Belchior1,2, Anna Yam3, Kelsey R Thomas4, Daphne Bavelier5, Karlene K Ball6, William C Mann7, Michael Marsiske8. 1. 1 School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. 2. 2 Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal; Geneva, Switzerland. 3. 3 Kaiser Permanent Medical Center; Geneva, Switzerland. 4. 4 VA San Diego Health Care System; Geneva, Switzerland. 5. 5 Neuroscience Center; University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 6. 6 Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 7. 7 North Florida/South Georgia VA Medical Center, Center of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Gainesville, Florida. 8. 8 Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study compared older adults' gains in cognitive and everyday functioning after a 60-session home-basedvideogame intervention with gains seen under formal cognitive training and usual care/no intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were randomized to one of three groups: one group played an off-the-shelf videogame (i.e., Crazy Taxi), the second group engaged in a computerized training program focused on visual attention and processing speed (i.e., PositScience InSight), and the third group received no training. Training in the two intervention conditions consisted of 60 training sessions of 1 hour each, which were completed in 3 months (5 hours a week). Participants received a broad battery of cognitive and everyday functioning assessments immediately before (pretest), after (post-test), and 3 months after (follow-up) training. RESULTS: Both training conditions improved on direct assessments of trained outcomes. In the InSight-trained group, we found transfer to untrained measures of visual attention and processing speed that were similar to the trained tasks, and these gains endured for up to 3 months. Participants in the videogame condition showed small additional benefits, not emerging until 3 months after intervention completion, on a measure of both attention and mood. No trained groups showed gain on visuospatial skills or memory. CONCLUSION: Training effects were highly specific to the target of training. Training effects to visual attention and processing speed were, as expected, larger for InSight-trained participants but were also seen for videogame participants. Given that past research has shown that videogame training leads to greater engagement than cognitive training, videogame interventions may represent a choice for more modest gains in a more engaging context.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study compared older adults' gains in cognitive and everyday functioning after a 60-session home-based videogame intervention with gains seen under formal cognitive training and usual care/no intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Participants were randomized to one of three groups: one group played an off-the-shelf videogame (i.e., Crazy Taxi), the second group engaged in a computerized training program focused on visual attention and processing speed (i.e., PositScience InSight), and the third group received no training. Training in the two intervention conditions consisted of 60 training sessions of 1 hour each, which were completed in 3 months (5 hours a week). Participants received a broad battery of cognitive and everyday functioning assessments immediately before (pretest), after (post-test), and 3 months after (follow-up) training. RESULTS: Both training conditions improved on direct assessments of trained outcomes. In the InSight-trained group, we found transfer to untrained measures of visual attention and processing speed that were similar to the trained tasks, and these gains endured for up to 3 months. Participants in the videogame condition showed small additional benefits, not emerging until 3 months after intervention completion, on a measure of both attention and mood. No trained groups showed gain on visuospatial skills or memory. CONCLUSION: Training effects were highly specific to the target of training. Training effects to visual attention and processing speed were, as expected, larger for InSight-trained participants but were also seen for videogame participants. Given that past research has shown that videogame training leads to greater engagement than cognitive training, videogame interventions may represent a choice for more modest gains in a more engaging context.
Authors: Sydney Y Schaefer; Andrew Hooyman; Nicole K Haikalis; Randy Essikpe; Keith R Lohse; Kevin Duff; Peiyuan Wang Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2022-10-13 Impact factor: 2.064