Quoc-Thai Nguyen1,2,3, Elvira Romero1, Willem P Dijkman1, Suzan Pantaroto de Vasconcellos1,4, Claudia Binda5, Andrea Mattevi5, Marco W Fraaije1. 1. Molecular Enzymology Group, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute , University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands. 2. Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia , Piazza della Vittoria 15 , 27100 Pavia , Italy. 3. Faculty of Pharmacy , University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City , 41 Dinh Tien Hoang Street, Ben Nghe Ward, District 1 , Ho Chi Minh City , Vietnam. 4. Department of Biological Science , Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) , Diadema , SP 09913-030 , Brazil. 5. Department of Biology and Biotechnology , University of Pavia , Via Ferrata 1 , 27100 Pavia , Italy.
Abstract
Glycerol is a major byproduct of biodiesel production, and enzymes that oxidize this compound have been long sought after. The recently described alcohol oxidase from the white-rot basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium (PcAOX) was reported to feature very mild activity on glycerol. Here, we describe the comprehensive structural and biochemical characterization of this enzyme. PcAOX was expressed in Escherichia coli in high yields and displayed high thermostability. Steady-state kinetics revealed that PcAOX is highly active toward methanol, ethanol, and 1-propanol ( kcat = 18, 19, and 11 s-1, respectively), but showed very limited activity toward glycerol ( kobs = 0.2 s-1 at 2 M substrate). The crystal structure of the homo-octameric PcAOX was determined at a resolution of 2.6 Å. The catalytic center is a remarkable solvent-inaccessible cavity located at the re side of the flavin cofactor. Its small size explains the observed preference for methanol and ethanol as best substrates. These findings led us to design several cavity-enlarging mutants with significantly improved activity toward glycerol. Among them, the F101S variant had a high kcat value of 3 s-1, retaining a high degree of thermostability. The crystal structure of F101S PcAOX was solved, confirming the site of mutation and the larger substrate-binding pocket. Our data demonstrate that PcAOX is a very promising enzyme for glycerol biotransformation.
Glycerol is a major byproduct of biodiesel production, and enzymes that oxidize this compound have been long sought after. The recently described alcohol oxidase from the white-rot basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium (PcAOX) was reported to feature very mild activity on glycerol. Here, we describe the comprehensive structural and biochemical characterization of this enzyme. PcAOX was expressed in Escherichia coli in high yields and displayed high thermostability. Steady-state kinetics revealed that PcAOX is highly active toward methanol, ethanol, and 1-propanol ( kcat = 18, 19, and 11 s-1, respectively), but showed very limited activity toward glycerol ( kobs = 0.2 s-1 at 2 M substrate). The crystal structure of the homo-octameric PcAOX was determined at a resolution of 2.6 Å. The catalytic center is a remarkable solvent-inaccessible cavity located at the re side of the flavin cofactor. Its small size explains the observed preference for methanol and ethanol as best substrates. These findings led us to design several cavity-enlarging mutants with significantly improved activity toward glycerol. Among them, the F101S variant had a high kcat value of 3 s-1, retaining a high degree of thermostability. The crystal structure of F101SPcAOX was solved, confirming the site of mutation and the larger substrate-binding pocket. Our data demonstrate that PcAOX is a very promising enzyme for glycerol biotransformation.
Flavin-containing
oxidases have
gained considerable attention and popularity in biotechnological applications,
because of their ability to catalyze oxidations of alcohols and amines
with exquisite chemoselectivies, regioselectivies, and/or enantioselectivies.[1−4] The interest for these biocatalysts stems from their dependence
on molecular oxygen—an inexpensive and environmentally benign
oxidant—as an electron acceptor, which is typically reduced
to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Furthermore, the
equilibrium of the reactions catalyzed by flavin-dependent oxidases
is shifted toward the oxidation of the organic substrate, while the
reduction is often favored in the equivalent redox reactions catalyzed
by dehydrogenases.[5] The most well-known
examples of oxidase biocatalysts include glucose oxidase,[6]d-amino acid oxidase,[7] monoamine oxidase,[8] and cholesterol
oxidase,[9] which have been widely used for
decades in bioanalytical, agrochemical, and pharmaceutical applications.Alcohol oxidases (AOX, EC 1.1.3.13), also known as methanol oxidases,
belong to the glucose–methanol–choline (GMC) oxidoreductase
superfamily and contain a noncovalently bound FAD cofactor.[10−12] AOXs from methylotrophic yeasts catalyze the oxidation of methanol,
yielding formaldehyde and H2O2 in specialized
organelles, the peroxisomes, where the latter product can be decomposed
by co-compartmentalized catalase.[13] AOX
from Gloeophyllum trabeum and presumably from other
wood-degrading basidiomycetes are instead associated with periplasmic
and external membranous structures.[14] This
distribution supports the proposed role of basidiomycete AOXs in providing
H2O2 for wood decay, at the expense of the methanol
resulting from lignin demethoxylation.[14] In addition to the physiological substrate methanol, AOXs can typically
oxidize also short aliphatic primary alcohols of up to four carbons.
Although being discovered 50 years ago, the first AOX structure was
elucidated only in 2016 [AOX from Pichia pastoris, reassigned to the genus Komagataella (PpAOX1)].[15,16]Recently, a novel AOX from the white-rot basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium was identified and isolated
(PcAOX; GenBank: HG425201, UniProtKB/TrEMBL: T2M2J4).[17] The corresponding gene does not include the C-terminal
sequence involved in targeting yeastAOXs to peroxisomes,[18] as expected for basidiomycete AOXs (see above).
The reported substrate profiling data for PcAOX indicated that the
enzyme accepts aliphatic primary alcohols of up to five carbon atoms.
Interestingly, glycerol, which is a polyol currently accumulated as
an excessive side-stream of biodiesel manufacture, was described as
a (poor) substrate for PcAOX.[17] This fact
suggested that PcAOX has a great potential in biotechnology and prompted
us to further investigate this oxidase.In this context, the
goal of our present study was 3-fold. First,
we established an extremely effective recombinant expression system
for producing PcAOX in Escherichia coli (rather than
using homologous expression or yeast). This enabled a more-detailed
characterization of the newly identified PcAOX and explorative studies
of this enzyme as an industrial biocatalyst. Second, we determined
the X-ray structure of PcAOX, which represents the second known AOX
structure and adds insights into the structural features and catalytic
mechanism of this class of enzymes. Finally, based on the structural
information, we mutated a few key residues within the active site
of PcAOX, converting this enzyme to a better glycerol oxidase, which
is the ultimate goal of this project.
Materials and Methods
Cloning
of Wild-Type AOX
The open reading frame for
AOX from P. chrysosporium (GenBank: HG425201, UniProtKB/TrEMBL:
T2M2J4) was purchased from GenScript (Piscataway, NJ, USA) with optimized
codons for protein expression in E. coli. The aox1 gene was amplified from the delivered plasmid using
Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific) and the corresponding
pair of primers shown in Table S1 in the
Supporting Information. The purified PCR products (100–200
ng) were incubated with 0.5 U Taq polymerase (Roche)
and 0.75 mM dATP at 72 °C for 15 min to introduce the 3′-A
overhangs. The resulting insert DNA fragments were ligated into the
pET-SUMO vector, according to the instruction manual of the Champion
pET SUMO expression system (Invitrogen). In the pET-SUMO-AOX construct,
the gene encoding for wild-type PcAOX is fused to the C-terminus of
SUMO.[19] SUMO carries a His-tag at the N-terminus.
Generation of AOX Mutants
The construction of the PcAOX
mutants F101S, F101N, M103S, and M103N was done by using the QuikChange
mutagenesis method with the corresponding pairs of primers shown in Table S1 in the Supporting Information. The pET-SUMO-AOX
plasmid was used as a template. All mutations were confirmed by sequencing.
Protein Expression and Purification
Transformed E. coliBL21(DE3) were grown in Terrific Broth containing
50 μg/mL kanamycin and 1% (w/v) glucose at 37 °C. Protein
expression was induced when the cultures reached OD600 ≈
0.7–0.8 by adding 1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside.
Next, the cells were incubated at 24 °C until late stationary
phase and then harvested by centrifugation at 4600g for 10 min (Beckman–Coulter JA-10 rotor, 4 °C). The
resulting cell pellet was stored at −20 °C.Cells
were resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.8,
400 mM NaCl, 100 mM KCl, 20 mM imidazole, 100 μM FAD) and mechanically
disrupted by sonication using a VCX130 Vibra-Cell (Sonics & Materials,
Inc., Newtown, CT, USA) at 4 °C (5 s on, 10 s off, 70% amplitude,
total of 5 min). After the removal of cellular debris by centrifugation
(20 000g, Beckman–Coulter JA-25.5 rotor,
4 °C, 45 min), the supernatant was loaded onto a 5 mL HisTrap
HP column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated using the lysis buffer.
The elution of the recombinant enzyme fused to the His-SUMO tag was
performed using a 20–500 mM imidazole gradient. Fractions containing
the pure enzyme as indicated by SDS-PAGE were pooled and then desalted
and concentrated using a 30-kDa MWCO Amicon (Millipore) centrifugal
filter unit and potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.5). To obtain
the nonfused PcAOX, the His-SUMO tag was cleaved by incubating with
10% (mol/mol) SUMO protease (Invitrogen) overnight at 4 °C in
lysis buffer supplemented with 1 M urea. Subsequently, the nonfused
PcAOX was purified from the cleavage mixture via gel permeation, using
a Superdex 200 10/300 GL (GE Healthcare) column and 10 mM Tris-HCl
pH 7.5 buffer with 100 mM NaCl prior to crystallization experiments.
Mutant proteins were expressed and purified as the wild-type enzyme.
Biochemical Characterization
Purified PcAOX, either
untagged or SUMO-tagged, wild-type or mutant, proteins were purified
as fully FAD-bound holoenzymes and there was no need to supplement
FAD during purification, indicating tight binding of the cofactor.
The UV-vis spectrum of wild-type His-SUMO-PcAOX was recorded from
250 nm to 650 nm in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0 before and after addition
of 0.1% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The extinction coefficient
of PcAOX was determined based on that of free FAD, as described previously.[20]The pH optimum for the wild-type enzyme
activity was determined based on dioxygen consumption rates, using
methanol as a substrate. The reaction contains 40 mM Britton–Robinson
buffer at various pH values,[21] 0.1 μM
enzyme, and 25 mM methanol in a final volume of 1 mL. Activities were
monitored for 5 min at 23 °C using a Hansatech Oxygraph instrument
(Hansatech Instruments Ltd., Norfolk, U.K.). Prior to the measurements,
the zero dioxygen level was calibrated by complete reduction using
sodium dithionite.PcAOX thermostability was determined based
on the apparent melting
temperature of the enzyme using the ThermoFAD protocol as previously
described,[22] with a MiniOpticon real-time
PCR detection system and 48-well RT-PCR plates (Biorad Laboratories,
Hercules, CA, USA). Each well has a final volume of 20 μL containing
2.0 μL of 100 μM AOX stock (in 50 mM potassium phosphate
pH 7.5) diluted in the tested buffers (in duplicate). In the case
of the F101SPcAOX variant, the long-term stability was investigated
by incubating the enzyme (32 μM) in 100 mM potassium phosphate
pH 7.5 and 25 °C for 7 days (200 μL, final volume). An
aliquot (5 μL) of the enzyme solution was taken at several time
points to determine enzyme activity on glycerol (2 M) using a horseradish
peroxidase (HRP)-coupled assay in 50 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5
(100 μL, final volume). H2O2 generated
by the oxidase (1 μM) is used by HRP (40 U/mL, Sigma) to catalyze
the oxidative coupling reaction of 4-aminoantipyrine (0.1 mM) and
3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzenesulfonic acid (1 mM). This assay results
in the formation of a pink to purple quinoid product that was monitored
at 515 nm (ε515 = 26 mM–1 cm–1), using a Cary 100 Bio UV-visible spectrophotometer
(Varian, Inc., USA) at 25 °C.[23] This
assay was also used to study the influence of NaCl (0.025–1.0
M NaCl) on the activity on glycerol (2 M) for the F101SPcAOX variant
(1 μM) in 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5).To determine
the apparent steady-state kinetics parameters, AOX
(40–0.5 μM) activity on various substrates was measured
at 25 °C in 50 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5 using the HRP-coupled
assay.
Purpald Assay
F101SPcAOX (13 μM) was reacted
with glycerol (205 mM) in 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5 containing
2 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol and 1014 U catalase (Micrococcus lysodeikticus, Sigma–Aldrich), at 25 °C and 50 rpm (Innova 40 incubator
shaker; 2 mL reactions in 20 mL vials). After 68 h of incubation,
200 μL of the reactions were mixed with 200 μL of Purpald
(Sigma–Aldrich, 5 mg/mL in 0.5 N NaOH). Next, samples were
incubated at 30 °C and 700 rpm for 30 min (Eppendorf ThermoMixer
C) and subsequently mixed with 600 μL of water. Finally, 50
μL of the resulting solutions were diluted with 950 μL
of water to record their absorbance spectrum. In parallel, the same
procedure was performed for control reactions without F101SPcAOX,
except that the last dilution (1:20) was not performed before measuring.
Similarly, 200 μL of 1 mM glyceraldehyde, glycerol, and glyceric
acid were reacted with 200 μL of Purpald. Subsequently, these
standard solutions were diluted with water (final concentration =
0.2 mM, 1 mL) just prior to recording their absorbance spectrum.
Protein Crystallization, X-ray Data Collection, and Structure
Determination
The wild-type and F101SPcAOXs were crystallized
using the sitting-drop vapor diffusion technique at 20 °C by
mixing equal volumes of 9.3 mg/mL enzyme (in 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5,
100 mM NaCl, 66 μM FAD) and mother liquor containing 14% (w/v)
PEG3350 and 0.2 M potassium acetate. Prior to X-ray data collection,
crystals were cryo-protected in solution containing 18% (w/v) PEG3350,
0.2 M potassium acetate, and 20% (v/v) glycerol and were flash-cooled
by plunging them into liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction (XRD) data
to 2.5–2.6 Å were collected at the ID23-EH2 and ID29 beamlines
of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in Grenoble, France
(ESRF) and at the PXIII beamline of the Swiss Light Source (SLS) in
Villigen, Switzerland. Image indexing, integration, and data scaling
were processed with the Xds package[24,25] and programs
of the CCP4 suite.[26] The diffraction images
for the wild-type enzyme appeared strongly anisotropic, extending
to 3.1, 2.6, and 2.4 Å resolution in the direction of a*, b*, and c*, respectively,
which resulted in a high Rsym value (see Table ). The high-resolution
shell cutoff was determined based on the correlation coefficient of
half-datasets (CC1/2) and visual inspection of the quality
of the electron density map as previously described.[27,28]
Table 1
Data Collection and Refinement Statistics
PcAOX
wild-type
F101S
PDB ID
6H3G
6H3O
space group
P21
P21
resolution (Å)
2.60
2.50
unit-cell dimensions
a (Å)
112.7
112.1
b (Å)
204.0
203.6
c (Å)
116.5
116.0
Rsyma,b (%)
13.3 (109.2)
14.4 (65.7)
completenessb (%)
97.8 (97.8)
98.5 (96.8)
unique reflections
151989
170450
multiplicityb
3.6 (3.6)
2.9 (2.9)
I/σb
6.9 (0.9)
6.3 (1.4)
CC1/2b
0.99 (0.39)
0.98 (0.49)
number
of atoms
protein
40134
40654
FAD
8 × 53
8 × 53
glycerol
5 × 6
2 × 6
water
578
695
average B value for all atoms (Å2)
56.6
32.9
Rcrystb,c (%)
19.3 (36.5)
21.0 (33.7)
Rfreeb,c (%)
26.4 (37.6)
28.6 (37.8)
root mean square (rms) bond
length (Å)
0.006
0.006
root mean square (rms) bond
angle (deg)
1.22
1.22
Ramachandran outliers (%)
0.16
0.21
Rsym = ∑|I –
⟨I⟩|/∑I, where I is the intensity of ith observation
and ⟨I⟩ is the mean intensity of the
reflection.
Values in parentheses
are for reflections
in the highest resolution shell.
Rcryst = ∑|Fobs – Fcalc|/∑|Fobs|, where Fobs and Fcalc are
the observed and calculated structure factor amplitudes, respectively. Rcryst and Rfree were
calculated using the working and test sets, respectively.
Rsym = ∑|I –
⟨I⟩|/∑I, where I is the intensity of ith observation
and ⟨I⟩ is the mean intensity of the
reflection.Values in parentheses
are for reflections
in the highest resolution shell.Rcryst = ∑|Fobs – Fcalc|/∑|Fobs|, where Fobs and Fcalc are
the observed and calculated structure factor amplitudes, respectively. Rcryst and Rfree were
calculated using the working and test sets, respectively.The wild-type PcAOX structure was
solved by molecular replacement
using Phaser[29] and the coordinates of PpAOX1
[Protein Databank (PDB) ID: 5HSA],[15] which shares 52% sequence
identity with PcAOX, as the search model devoid of all ligand and
water molecules. Similarly, the F101S mutant structure was solved
using the coordinates of the wild-type PcAOX. Manual model rebuilding
and structure inspection were performed with Coot,[30] whereas alternating cycles of refinement were performed
with Refmac5.[31] PISA server was used to
analyze the oligomeric organization of the protein and the molecular
interface area.[32] Figures were drawn with
UCSF Chimera.[33] The detailed data processing
statistics of the collected data set are summarized in Table .
Results
Expression
and Purification of PcAOX Wild-Type and Variants
The production
of soluble PcAOX, which is a fungal protein, was
facilitated by codon optimization for E. coli expression
and presumably also by the fusion to a small ubiquitin-related modifier
(SUMO) at the N-terminus of the protein. The SUMO fusion is known
to enhance the expression level and solubility of partially insoluble
proteins, which were often encountered with enzymes of eukaryotic
origin that are expressed in E. coli.[19] From 1 L of culture, ∼600 mg of purified
yellow-colored His-SUMO-PcAOX could be obtained after one step of
purification. The purified PcAOX generally displayed a typical UV-vis
absorption spectrum for enzymes containing flavin in the oxidized
state (quinone), with two absorption maxima at 385 and 455 nm (Figure A). Upon unfolding
the enzyme with 0.1% (w/v) SDS, the absorption spectrum of the released
flavin was recorded and used to determine the extinction coefficient
of the enzyme (ε455 = 10.3 mM–1 cm–1). Very occasionally, purified PcAOX contained
a variable amount of flavin cofactor in the semiquinone state. Evidence
for this came from the observation of higher absorbance at 385 nm
than at 455 nm and the presence of an additional shoulder at 400 nm
(Figure B).[34] These protein batches were not used for kinetic
studies.
Figure 1
UV-vis spectral properties of PcAOX. (A) Absorption spectra of
His-SUMO-PcAOX in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0 before (solid line) and after
addition of 1% (w/v) SDS (broken line). (B) Spectra for F101S PcAOX.
Comparison of the absorption spectra observed after two purification
processes. Different ratios of the semiquinone (SQ) and quinone forms
of the flavin are observed.
UV-vis spectral properties of PcAOX. (A) Absorption spectra of
His-SUMO-PcAOX in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0 before (solid line) and after
addition of 1% (w/v) SDS (broken line). (B) Spectra for F101SPcAOX.
Comparison of the absorption spectra observed after two purification
processes. Different ratios of the semiquinone (SQ) and quinone forms
of the flavin are observed.The N-terminal His-SUMO tag was cleaved from the fusion enzyme
by treatment with SUMO protease. The UV-vis absorption spectrum of
the resulting PcAOX was identical to that of the fusion enzyme. The
observed catalytic rates measured with ethanol were also comparable
for both forms (tagged and untagged) of PcAOX (∼15 s–1 at 125 mM ethanol). These results indicated that the SUMO fusion
at the N-terminus has no significant effects either on the microenvironment
around the flavin cofactor or the enzyme activity. Nevertheless, the
native PcAOX had the tendency to precipitate upon storage at 4 °C,
implying that the His-SUMO fusion is crucial for maintaining the protein
stability. For this reason, except for the crystallization and structure
determination, we used His-SUMO-PcAOX (wild-type or mutant) for all
kinetics and substrate profiling experiments.
pH Optimum and Thermostability
of PcAOX
To evaluate
the optimal pH for wild-type PcAOX activity, methanol oxidation rates
were measured between pH 3.0–10. The enzyme displayed a clear
preference for neutral to basic conditions (Figure ), with an optimal pH value of 9.0. The oxidase
retained more than 75% of its activity between pH 7.0 and pH 10.0.
Beyond pH 6.0 and pH 11.0, the activity sharply decreased below 50%
of that at pH 9.0.
Figure 2
Effect of pH on methanol oxidation catalyzed by wild-type
PcAOX.
The reactions contained 40 mM Britton–Robinson buffer, 0.1
μM PcAOX, and 25 mM methanol. Activity was monitored, by following
dioxygen consumption for 5 min at 23 °C, using a Hansatech Oxygraph
instrument.
Effect of pH on methanol oxidation catalyzed by wild-type
PcAOX.
The reactions contained 40 mM Britton–Robinson buffer, 0.1
μM PcAOX, and 25 mM methanol. Activity was monitored, by following
dioxygen consumption for 5 min at 23 °C, using a Hansatech Oxygraph
instrument.The melting temperatures
(Tm) of wild-type
PcAOX determined by the ThermoFAD method in various buffers indicated
that the enzyme is highly thermostable (Table ). Over a wide range of pH values from pH
5.0 to pH 8.0, Tm > 53 °C, even
though
the enzyme is somewhat less thermostable at pH 4.0 and pH 9.0. The
addition of NaCl has virtually no effect on the enzyme thermostability,
but we noticed that, in the absence of salt, concentrated enzyme had
a tendency to precipitate at room temperature. The ThermoFAD experiments
further suggested that PcAOX tolerates various water-miscible solvents
such as methanol (0.5 M), ethanol (0.1 M), and glycerol (5 M), as
judged by their minor influence on the Tm values. Based on these experiments, a buffer consisting of 50 mM
potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) and a temperature of 25 °C were
chosen as optimal conditions for activity assays.
Table 2
Unfolding Temperatures of PcAOXs in
Different Buffers Determined by the ThermoFAD Method
condition
Tm (°C) of PcAOX
wild-type
F101S
F101N
5 mM KPi pH 7.5
58
51
52
50 mM KPi pH 7.5
57
49
50
50
mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5
58
51
53
50 mM HEPES pH 7.5
61
52
53
Britton–Robinson
buffer, pH 3.0
31
36
37
Britton–Robinson
buffer, pH 4.0
47
46
48
Britton–Robinson
buffer, pH 5.0
62
50
48
Britton–Robinson
buffer, pH 6.0
62
51
55
Britton–Robinson
buffer, pH 7.0
57
51
53
Britton–Robinson
buffer, pH 8.0
53
48
50
Britton–Robinson
buffer, pH 9.0
43
41
42
Britton–Robinson
buffer, pH 10.0
35
34
34
Britton–Robinson
buffer, pH 11.0
31
30
31
100 mM NaCl, 50 mM KPi,
pH 7.5
56
50
52
500 mM NaCl, 50 mM KPi,
pH 7.5
55
50
52
1 M glycerol, 50 mM KPi,
pH 7.5
58
57
55
5 M glycerol, 50 mM KPi,
pH 7.5
58
58
56
20 mM MeOH, 50 mM KPi, pH
7.5
55
56
55
100 mM MeOH, 50 mM KPi,
pH 7.5
51
54
53
100 mM EtOH, 50 mM KPi,
pH 7.5
58
60
57
500 mM EtOH, 50 mM KPi,
pH 7.5
57
59
54
Steady-State Kinetics
To determine the apparent steady-state
kinetic parameters for PcAOX (see Table , as well as Figure S1 in the Supporting Information), a HRP-coupled assay was used to
probe the H2O2 production rates upon oxidation
of the different AOX substrates. The initial reaction rates were recorded
and were satisfactory fitted to the Michaelis–Menten equation
in all cases. The kcat values measured
with methanol and ethanol were found to be similar (∼20 s–1), whereas the KM value
for methanol was 8-fold lower than that for ethanol. Specifically,
these determined KM values (2 and 15 mM,
respectively) differ somewhat from previously reported (37 and 23
mM, respectively).[17] Conversely, our measured kcat and KM values
are comparable to the kinetic parameters of PpAOX1 (kcat and KM for methanol of
6 s–1 and 1 mM, respectively).[15] Propanol turned out to be a good substrate for the enzyme,
whereas virtually no activity was detected on 1,2-propanediol (see Table ). Thus, as observed
for other AOXs, methanol represents the best substrate for PcAOX and
the activities rapidly vanish with alcohols of increasing lengths.
Most importantly, for our goal of exploring PcAOX as a glycerol biocatalyst,
we invariably observed only a very low activity using glycerol as
a substrate. Only at extremely high substrate concentrations (1.0–4.0
M) we could measure some conversions with rates in the range of 0.1–0.2
s–1 (see Table ).
Table 3
Apparent Steady-State Kinetic Parameters
for PcAOXa
wild-type
F101S
F101N
M103S
KM
kcat
kcat/KM
KM
kcat
kcat/KM
KM
kcat
kcat/KM
KM
kcat
kcat/KM
methanol
2
18
9000
2
4
2000
14
10
710
2
1
500
ethanol
15
19
1300
1
5
5000
11
10
910
1
1
1000
1-propanol
45
11
240
4
7
1800
11
12
1100
2
1
500
(R)-(−)-1,2-propanediol
>1600
>5
>3
110
4
36
1200
13
11
110
0.4
4
glycerol
kobs = 0.2 s–1 at 2 M substrate
580
3
5
>2000
>1
1
650
0.4
1
Values obtained
using the HRP-coupled
assay in 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5. KM values are presented in units of mM, kcat values are presented in units of s–1,
and kcat/KM values are presented in units of M–1 s–1. Standard errors of best fits parameters determined by nonlinear
regression are ≤11%.
Values obtained
using the HRP-coupled
assay in 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5. KM values are presented in units of mM, kcat values are presented in units of s–1,
and kcat/KM values are presented in units of M–1 s–1. Standard errors of best fits parameters determined by nonlinear
regression are ≤11%.
AOX Overall Structure
PcAOX crystallized as a homo-octamer
that, similarly to PpAOX1, can be interpreted as either a tetramer
of dimers or a dimer of two tetramers facing each other (see Figures and 4). Each monomer consists of residues 2 to 645 and a noncovalently
bound FAD molecule. Within each monomer, two domains can be recognized
with the classic topology found in the members of the GMC oxidoreductase
superfamily: a substrate-binding domain and a FAD-binding domain (see Figure ).[35] The latter is characterized by the typical Rossmann fold,
featuring a sandwich of a five-stranded parallel and a three-stranded
antiparallel β-sheets. The substrate binding domain comprises
a six-stranded β-antiparallel sheet. The interface between the
two tetramers is quite extensive, as indicated by the burial of 11%
(∼3000 Å2) of the monomer surface, including
38 intersubunit hydrogen bonds and 3 salt bridges. Therefore, upon
octamer formation, each monomer buries ∼25% of its solvent-accessible
surface area, which strongly stabilizes the oligomer (see Figure ).
Figure 3
Crystal structure of PcAOX. The PcAOX octamer is shown as surface
(left) and ribbon (right) representations with each individual monomer
depicted in different color. For the sake of clarity, the FAD cofactor
(in yellow ball-and-stick) is shown only for the monomers in the front.
(A) Top view along the 4-fold axis. (B) Side view along the 2-fold
axis (this orientation is obtained by rotating the oligomer 90°,
with respect to the orientation in panel (A)).
Figure 4
Superposition of PcAOX monomer A (in deep sky blue) with
that of
the homologous PpAOX1 (in light gray, 52% sequence identity, PDB ID: 5HSA). The overall topology
of the two structures and the active site are highly conserved. Besides
a longer loop of 12 amino acids at the C-terminus in PpAOX1 (which
is not visible in the figure due to the orientation), the major differences
between the two proteins lie in the length of some loops that are
labeled with the corresponding residues. FAD is drawn as sticks with
C atoms in yellow (for PcAOX) or in light gray (for PpAOX1), O atoms
in red, N atoms in blue, and P atoms in orange.
Crystal structure of PcAOX. The PcAOX octamer is shown as surface
(left) and ribbon (right) representations with each individual monomer
depicted in different color. For the sake of clarity, the FAD cofactor
(in yellow ball-and-stick) is shown only for the monomers in the front.
(A) Top view along the 4-fold axis. (B) Side view along the 2-fold
axis (this orientation is obtained by rotating the oligomer 90°,
with respect to the orientation in panel (A)).The monomers from PcAOX and PpAOX1 are closely related, as
indicated
by a root-mean-square (rms) deviation of 0.92 Å for 642 common
pairs of Cα atoms upon superposition of the monomer in the two
enzyme structures (see Figure ). The only major differences
between the two structures entail a shorter loop (573–574,
corresponding to 579–586 in PpAOX1) in the FAD–binding
domain and a short insert (525–538, corresponding to 521–544
in PpAOX1) in the vicinity of the substrate–binding domain.
The latter, so-called “enabling loop”, facilitates formation
of both dimeric and tetrameric subassemblies in PpAOX1.[15] In addition, PpAOX1 carries a peroxisomal targeting
signal (PTS1) at the C-terminal extension, which was believed to be
crucial for functional octamer assembly maturation.[15] Interestingly, despite a high structural similarity, PcAOX
does not contain the C-terminal signal involved in targeting yeastAOXs to peroxisomes.Superposition of PcAOX monomer A (in deep sky blue) with
that of
the homologous PpAOX1 (in light gray, 52% sequence identity, PDB ID: 5HSA). The overall topology
of the two structures and the active site are highly conserved. Besides
a longer loop of 12 amino acids at the C-terminus in PpAOX1 (which
is not visible in the figure due to the orientation), the major differences
between the two proteins lie in the length of some loops that are
labeled with the corresponding residues. FAD is drawn as sticks with
C atoms in yellow (for PcAOX) or in light gray (for PpAOX1), O atoms
in red, N atoms in blue, and P atoms in orange.
The Active Site of PcAOX
Similar to the other GMC oxidases,[16] all PcAOX subunits contain a dissociable and
tightly bound FAD cofactor buried deep inside the FAD-binding domain
in an elongated shape (see Figures and 5). This fact presumably
prevents the release of the cofactor during catalysis. Similar to
PpAOX1, the isoalloxazine ring in PcAOX is found in a bent conformation.
A distinctive feature of PpAOX1 and other yeastsAOXs is the presence
of a variable amount of modified FAD cofactor where the isoalloxazine
ring is attached to an unusual arabityl instead of a ribityl chain
(the carbon configuration of the sugar C2′ is changed from R to S).[15,36] In contrast,
PcAOX does not harbor such modified flavin, probably because of interspecies
variations and/or production and storage conditions.[36]
Figure 5
Quality
of the electron density. Maps were calculated after molecular
replacement and 8-fold averaging and are contoured at 1.2σ level.
(A) The 2.6 Å resolution map for Phe101 and the flavin in the
wild-type structure. (B) The 2.5 Å resolution map for the same
protein region in the structure of the F101S mutant (see Table ). For clarity, the
labels for Gln102 and Thr559 are omitted.
The substrate binding site in PcAOX is completely
solvent-inaccessible, a remarkable feature that has been observed
for PpAOX1 and also for members of the vanillyl alcohol oxidase family[37,38] (see Figure A). The two strictly conserved residues proximal
to the isoalloxazine ring in all GMC oxidoreductases, His–His
or His–Asn pairs, correspond to His561 and Asn604 in PcAOX
(and to His567 and Asn616 in PpAOX1) (see Figure and Figures A and 6B). The active site histidine
residue serves as a catalytic base in most of the GMC oxidoreductases,
abstracting a proton from the substrate hydroxyl group, whereas the
asparagine residue acts as a hydrogendonor.[1,2]
Figure 6
Active site. The three
panels show the active-site cavities of
(A) wild-type PcAOX, (B) PpAOX1, and (C) PcAOX F101S mutant. The structures
are in the same orientation. Flavin carbons are shown in yellow, protein
carbons are shown in gray, oxygens are shown in red, and nitrogens
are shown in blue. The shape of the cavities is depicted as a pink
semitransparent surface.
Quality
of the electron density. Maps were calculated after molecular
replacement and 8-fold averaging and are contoured at 1.2σ level.
(A) The 2.6 Å resolution map for Phe101 and the flavin in the
wild-type structure. (B) The 2.5 Å resolution map for the same
protein region in the structure of the F101S mutant (see Table ). For clarity, the
labels for Gln102 and Thr559 are omitted.Comparative analyses of the two AOX structures showed that
active
site residues, most of which are either aromatic and/or hydrophobic,
are largely conserved. Different amino acids between the two AOXs
include Cys311, Phe313, His394, Phe402, and Phe419 in PpAOX1, which
are replaced with Thre315, Leu317, Phe399, Tyr407, and Tyr419 in PcAOX,
respectively (see Figure S2 in the Supporting
Information). Despite these changes, the bulkiness and the hydrophobicity
of the residues remains equivalent; hence, the size and the shape
of the substrate cavity are essentially the same. Nevertheless, the
replacement of Phe313 in PpAOX1 by Leu317 in PcAOX is noteworthy.
As a result, the latter enzyme harbors some extra space for substrate
binding (see Figures A and 6B). This may
partly explain why PcAOX is able to convert glycerol (although with
very poor efficiency), in contrast to PpAOX1.Active site. The three
panels show the active-site cavities of
(A) wild-type PcAOX, (B) PpAOX1, and (C) PcAOXF101S mutant. The structures
are in the same orientation. Flavincarbons are shown in yellow, protein
carbons are shown in gray, oxygens are shown in red, and nitrogens
are shown in blue. The shape of the cavities is depicted as a pink
semitransparent surface.
Structure-Based Mutants Active on Glycerol
To probe
the residues that might have a crucial role in defining substrate
specificity, we modeled a glycerol molecule within the substrate binding
pocket of PcAOX at the re side of the flavin cofactor.
The cavity appears to have just about enough space to accommodate
this polyol and allows for only a few hydrogen bonds, which may explain
the very poor activity of PcAOX toward glycerol. In particular, residues
Phe101 and Met103 were predicted to be in very close contact and,
in the absence of conformational changes, with respect to the experimental
structure, might clash with glycerol. We reason that a larger and
more polar cavity could be created by mutating these residues into
smaller side chains bearing H-bonding groups. Therefore, we generated
the mutants F101S, F101N, and M103S (see Table S1 in the Supporting Information).In all cases, the
expression yields of the mutants were the same as that of the wild-type
PcAOX. Moreover, the generated mutants at position 101 had the same
melting temperatures as the wild-type enzyme (see Table ). Such an unperturbed thermostability
was not to be taken for granted, because the mutations remove a hydrophobic
residue deeply buried in the protein, which might cause some destabilization.
In light of these very encouraging initial observations, the three
F101S, F101N, and M103S variants were further characterized by performing
steady-state kinetics with the same reference substrates used for
the wild-type enzyme: methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, (R)-(−)-1,2-propanediol, and glycerol (see Table , as well as Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). These experiments
nicely highlighted a clear trend in that the mutants feature higher
catalytic efficiencies on ethanol (F101S, M103S) or propanol (F101N)
rather than on methanol as found for the wild-type enzyme. The finding
that all mutations increase the oxidation of (R)-(−)-1,2-propanediol
was consistent with this trend. Most satisfactorily, the kinetic experiments
indicated that the F101S and M103S variants oxidize glycerol much
more efficiently than the wild-type enzyme to the extent that the
steady-state kinetic parameters could be determined also for this
substrate (kcat = 0.4–3.0 s–1, KM = 0.58–0.65
M); only M103S had low activity with kobs < 0.1 s–1 (see Table , as well as Figure S1). In particular, the F101S enzyme stood out as the most efficient
catalyst for the oxidation of this polyol. Next, we confirmed glyceraldehyde
production in the reactions of the F101S variant with glycerol by
using the Purpald assay (see Figure ).[39] We also observed that
the activity on glycerol is significantly decreased in the presence
of NaCl (e.g., 40% relative activity with 25 mM NaCl; see Figure A). Such inhibition
effect was also observed with MnCl2 but not with MnSO4, suggesting that the chloride ion exerts a specific effect,
possibly by competing with a dioxygen binding pocket. However, in
the absence of NaCl, the F101S mutant is stable for 2 days and exhibits
36% of the initial activity after 7 days (see Figure B). Therefore, the cavity-enlarging mutations
resulted in the desired effect of increasing the activity on large
substrates without decreasing expression yields and thermostability.
Above all, F101S proved particularly effective in glycerol oxidation.
Figure 7
Determination
of aldehyde production in the reactions of F101S
AOX with glycerol using the Purpald assay. All spectra showed here
correspond to a 5-fold dilution of the initial reaction or standard
solutions (before mixing with Purpald). When additional dilutions
were required (see the Materials and Methods section), the spectra were corrected to obtain those presented here.
205 mM glycerol was incubated in the presence (13 μM) and the
absence of F101S AOX (as represented by the red solid line and the
red broken line, respectively). The inset shows that buffer (orange
line) and 0.2 mM glyceric acid (blue line) exhibited very low absorbance
at 540 nm, compared to that observed for 0.2 mM glyceraldehyde (green
line), after incubating with Purpald (standard solutions without AOX).
Figure 8
Activity on glycerol for the F101S PcAOX variant
(A) in the presence
of NaCl and (B) during incubation for prolonged time. In panel (A),
enzyme (1 μM) activity on glycerol (2 M) was determined using
the HRP-coupled assay in 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5 with various
NaCl concentrations. In panel (B), the long-term stability for the
F101S PcAOX variant was probed by incubating the enzyme (32 μM)
in 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5 and 25 °C). Activity on
glycerol (2 M) was determined using the HRP-coupled assay at various
time points.
Determination
of aldehyde production in the reactions of F101S
AOX with glycerol using the Purpald assay. All spectra showed here
correspond to a 5-fold dilution of the initial reaction or standard
solutions (before mixing with Purpald). When additional dilutions
were required (see the Materials and Methods section), the spectra were corrected to obtain those presented here.
205 mM glycerol was incubated in the presence (13 μM) and the
absence of F101S AOX (as represented by the red solid line and the
red broken line, respectively). The inset shows that buffer (orange
line) and 0.2 mM glyceric acid (blue line) exhibited very low absorbance
at 540 nm, compared to that observed for 0.2 mM glyceraldehyde (green
line), after incubating with Purpald (standard solutions without AOX).Activity on glycerol for the F101SPcAOX variant
(A) in the presence
of NaCl and (B) during incubation for prolonged time. In panel (A),
enzyme (1 μM) activity on glycerol (2 M) was determined using
the HRP-coupled assay in 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5 with various
NaCl concentrations. In panel (B), the long-term stability for the
F101SPcAOX variant was probed by incubating the enzyme (32 μM)
in 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5 and 25 °C). Activity on
glycerol (2 M) was determined using the HRP-coupled assay at various
time points.Given its properties,
the X-ray structure of the F101S protein
was determined by molecular replacement using the wild-type PcAOX
structure as the search model (Figure C and Table ). The overall structure and the active site of the mutant
are highly similar to that of the wild-type enzyme. It can be deduced
that the enhanced activity of the F101S mutant on glycerol is largely
attributed to a more spacious binding site, together with the hydrogen
bonding that may occur between the Ser at position 101 and glycerol.
Indeed, inspection of the active site by the program VOIDOO[40] allows one to identify a cavity in front of
the flavin cofactor which features a different shape and volume in
the wild-type and the F101SPcAOX structures (see Figures A and 6C). The cavity in the mutant F101S has a substantially larger volume
(127 Å3), compared to that of the wild-type PcAOX
and the PpAOX1 (37 and 31 Å3, respectively). Moreover,
the cavity in the mutant opens up to the surface of the protein connecting
to the interface with the adjacent subunit, which may represent the
pathway where substrates enter the active site (Figure C).
Discussion
With
the rapid increase in biodiesel production and the massive
availability of its byproduct glycerol, effective (bio)catalysts that
can convert glycerol to value-added products are in demand.[41−43] Among these, flavin-dependent oxidases that can oxidize glycerol
are highly desirable, as such biocatalysts that have the potential
to produce enantiomerically pure glyceraldehyde or glyceric acid.
Thus, an efficient glycerol oxidase would allow conversion of glycerol
to valuable building blocks while the concomitantly produced H2O2 may also be of value. Attempts to engineer the
available alcohol/polyol oxidases, e.g., alditol oxidase, into a “glycerol
oxidase” by directed evolution and rational design have resulted
in ineffective glycerol oxidases with poor catalytic efficiencies.
The best alditol oxidase mutant for oxidation of glycerol was found
to display a kcat value of only 0.06 s–1.[44]The recent identification
of a novel AOX from the white-rot basidiomycete P. chrysosporium that was suggested to possess minimal yet
significant glycerol oxidase activity prompted us to further investigate
this enzyme. Expression of aox-encoding genes in
prokaryotic hosts is a challenge, since most of AOXs are of eukaryotic
origin. However, we were able to overexpress PcAOX in E. coli. In fact, AOX from P. chrysosporium represents
the first fungal methanol oxidase within the GMC superfamily that
can be heterologously expressed in E. coli with a
rather impressive high yield: >600 mg of pure protein from 1 L
of
culture can be obtained by merely one purification step. We observed
that the purified PcAOX prefers neutral or basic conditions and is
active on methanol and ethanol with similarly high catalytic efficiencies.
The steady-state kinetic parameters reported here for PcAOX deviate
somewhat from those previously reported by Linke et al.,[17] which may be due to differences in reaction
and/or production conditions. Also note that isolation of PcAOX from
the natural host was shown to be problematic: it could only be isolated
by a gel permeation step while any other purification attempt resulted
in inactivation.[17] The presence of a varying
amount of modified FAD and/or the semiquinoneflavin form may also
have an influence on the catalytic properties observed for PcAOX obtained
in laboratories using a different expression system and conditions.
Indeed, it was previously shown that the modified FAD confers the
AOXs a higher affinity for methanol and a lower maximum activity.[36,45] The presence of a noncatalytically relevant stable flavin semiquinone
has been previously reported for AOXs from diverse sources,[10,46,47] as well as for other flavin-dependent
oxidases such as monoamine oxidase B, vanillyl alcohol oxidase, and
choline oxidase.[48−50] The reason for this observation is still unknown.Given the objective of our studies, the very low activity toward
glycerol by wild-type PcAOX (kobs = 0.2
s–1 at 2 M glycerol) was rather disappointing. This
activity is simply too low to be relevant for physiological conditions
or industrial applications. Inspection of PcAOX’s crystal structure
reveals that the substrate-binding is a small and remarkably solvent-inaccessible
cavity, in good agreement with a clear preference for methanol as
the best substrate. Modeling a glycerol molecule into the active site
(Figure A) invariably
showed that the cavity has just about enough space to accommodate
this polyol. Moreover, the high hydrophobicity of the substrate binding
pocket allows limited hydrogen bonding interactions between glycerol
and PcAOX. Based on the data, we designed mutants that turned out
to exhibit the desired significant improvement on glycerol conversion
without loss in thermostability and protein expression yields. We
consider the development of these PcAOX variants (especially the F101S
enzyme) as a very promising result because it delivers a first biocatalyst
for polyol conversions useful as a template for further scale-up development
and improvement. The mutants with significant activity on glycerol
can serve as biocatalysts for producing glyceraldehyde or for the
generation of hydrogen peroxide. Glyceraldehyde is seen as a precursor
for various high-value products.[51] Enzyme-catalyzed
formation of hydrogen peroxide using an inexpensive and renewable
substrate is also highly attractive to support biocatalysts that require
hydrogen peroxide, such as peroxidases and peroxygenases, or can serve
as a chemical oxidant. Furthermore, the generated mutant enzymes also
accept other small aliphatic alcohols such as (R)-(−)-1,2-propanediol,
yielding the corresponding lactaldehyde. Altogether, the generated
PcAOX variants provide a new biocatalytic toolbox of alcohol oxidases.
Authors: Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: Martyn D Winn; Charles C Ballard; Kevin D Cowtan; Eleanor J Dodson; Paul Emsley; Phil R Evans; Ronan M Keegan; Eugene B Krissinel; Andrew G W Leslie; Airlie McCoy; Stuart J McNicholas; Garib N Murshudov; Navraj S Pannu; Elizabeth A Potterton; Harold R Powell; Randy J Read; Alexei Vagin; Keith S Wilson Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Date: 2011-03-18
Authors: Michael S Westphall; Kenneth W Lee; Austin Z Salome; Jean M Lodge; Timothy Grant; Joshua J Coon Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 17.694