Literature DB >> 21358336

Underutilization of BRCA1/2 testing to guide breast cancer treatment: black and Hispanic women particularly at risk.

Douglas E Levy1, Stacey D Byfield, Catherine B Comstock, Judy E Garber, Sapna Syngal, William H Crown, Alexandra E Shields.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Women with early-onset (age ≤40 years) breast cancer are at high risk of carrying deleterious mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes; genetic assessment is thus recommended. Knowledge of BRCA1/2 mutation status is useful in guiding treatment decisions. To date, there has been no national study of BRCA1/2 testing among newly diagnosed women.
METHODS: We used administrative data (2004-2007) from a national sample of 14.4 million commercially insured patients to identify newly diagnosed, early-onset breast cancer cases among women aged 20-40 years (n = 1474). Cox models assessed BRCA1/2 testing, adjusting for covariates and differential lengths of follow-up.
RESULTS: Overall, 30% of women aged 40 years or younger received BRCA1/2 testing. In adjusted analyses, women of Jewish ethnicity were significantly more likely to be tested (hazard ratio = 2.83, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-5.28), whereas black women (hazard ratio = 0.34, 95% 0.18-0.64) and Hispanic women (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.81) were significantly less likely to be tested than non-Jewish white women. Those enrolled in a health maintenance organization (hazard ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.99) were significantly less likely to receive BRCA1/2 testing than those point of service insurance plans. Testing rates increased sharply for women diagnosed in 2007 compared with 2004.
CONCLUSIONS: In this national sample of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer at high risk for BRCA1/2 mutations, genetic assessment was low, with marked racial differences in testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358336      PMCID: PMC3604880          DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182091ba4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  33 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, Adopted on February 20, 1996.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Measuring quality of care: fundamental information from administrative datasets.

Authors:  D W Garnick; A M Hendricks; C B Comstock
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Prevalence of BRCA mutations and founder effect in high-risk Hispanic families.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weitzel; Veronica Lagos; Kathleen R Blazer; Rebecca Nelson; Charité Ricker; Josef Herzog; Colleen McGuire; Susan Neuhausen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly Metcalfe; Henry T Lynch; Parviz Ghadirian; Nadine Tung; Ivo Olivotto; Ellen Warner; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Andrea Eisen; Barbara Weber; Jane McLennan; Ping Sun; William D Foulkes; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Guidelines for genetic risk assessment of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: early disagreements and low utilization.

Authors:  Douglas E Levy; Judy E Garber; Alexandra E Shields
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Disparities in health care are driven by where minority patients seek care: examination of the hospital quality alliance measures.

Authors:  Romana Hasnain-Wynia; David W Baker; David Nerenz; Joe Feinglass; Anne C Beal; Mary Beth Landrum; Raj Behal; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-25

9.  Concentration and quality of hospitals that care for elderly black patients.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; E John Orav; Zhonghe Li; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-11

10.  Triangulating differential nonresponse by race in a telephone survey.

Authors:  Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Barbara K Rimer; Jennifer M Gierisch; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  126 in total

1.  Age-specific incidence of breast cancer subtypes: understanding the black-white crossover.

Authors:  Christina A Clarke; Theresa H M Keegan; Juan Yang; David J Press; Allison W Kurian; Anish H Patel; James V Lacey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Symposium on advances in endometrial cancer epidemiology and biology.

Authors:  Sara H Olson; Immaculata De Vivo; Veronica W Setiawan; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Cancer Survivorship Care: An Opportunity to Revisit Cancer Genetics.

Authors:  Kathryn J Ruddy; Betsy C Risendal; Judy E Garber; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Risks of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics? What the scientists say.

Authors:  T Hurlimann; V Menuz; J Graham; J Robitaille; M-C Vohl; B Godard
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 5.523

5.  Utilization of Genetic Testing for RET Mutations in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: a Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Emily Parkhurst; Elise Calonico; Sridevi Abboy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Current Approaches to Cancer Genetic Counseling Services for Spanish-Speaking Patients.

Authors:  Bianca Augusto; Monica L Kasting; Fergus J Couch; Noralane M Lindor; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2019-04

Review 7.  Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  The Contribution of Health Care and Other Interventions to Black-White Disparities in Life Expectancy, 1980-2007.

Authors:  Irma T Elo; Hiram Beltrán-Sánchez; James Macinko
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2014-02-01

9.  Health beliefs associated with readiness for genetic counseling among high risk breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Monica L Kasting; Kelli Nam; Courtney L Scherr; Jongphil Kim; Ram Thapa; Cathy D Meade; M Catherine Lee; Tuya Pal; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  A high frequency of BRCA mutations in young black women with breast cancer residing in Florida.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Devon Bonner; Deborah Cragun; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Catherine Phelan; Lily Servais; Jongphil Kim; Steven A Narod; Mohammad R Akbari; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.