Literature DB >> 34506673

Implementation of an Embedded In-Clinic Genetic Testing Station to Optimize Germline Testing for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Evan J Walker1,2, Dena Goldberg2,3, Kelly M Gordon2,3, Christina Pedley1,2, Julia Carnevale1,2, Pelin Cinar1,2, Eric A Collisson1,2, Margaret A Tempero1,2, Andrew H Ko1,2, Amie M Blanco2,3, Mallika Dhawan1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Germline genetic testing is universally recommended for patients with pancreatic cancer, but testing remains infrequent. In May 2018, we implemented a systematic patient intake workflow featuring an in-clinic genetic testing station (GTS) at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) to expedite genetic counseling and facilitate sample collection. We sought to determine the impact of this innovation on rates of genetic counseling and testing.
METHODS: Medical records, patient intake records, and genetic test reports were retrospectively reviewed for new patients with pancreatic cancer eligible for germline testing at UCSF from May 2018 to May 2019. Primary outcomes included the rate of offered genetic counseling and confirmed germline testing. Data were compared for periods before and after GTS implementation. Associations between demographic characteristics and testing rates were assessed.
RESULTS: Genetic counseling/testing was offered to 209 (94%) of 223 eligible patients, and 158 (71%) completed testing (135 at UCSF, 23 elsewhere). Compared with a traditional referral-based genetic counseling model, confirmed testing increased from 19% to 71%, patient attrition between referral and genetics appointment decreased from 36% to 3%, and rate of pathogenic variant detection increased from 20% to 33%. Patients who were younger, identified as non-Hispanic White, and spoke English as a primary language were more likely to complete testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a systematic patient intake workflow and in-clinic GTS resulted in the highest reported real-world rate of germline testing for patients with pancreatic cancer. Health care disparities were identified and will guide future innovation. This report provides a model for other centers to create a similar testing infrastructure. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study demonstrates that a systematic patient intake workflow and associated in-clinic genetic testing station improve delivery of genetic counseling and completion of germline testing for patients with pancreatic cancer. This study achieved, to the authors' knowledge, the highest real-world rate of confirmed genetic testing in this patient population. This article describes this innovation in detail to guide replication at other medical centers and facilitate guideline-concordant care for patients with pancreatic cancer. This infrastructure can also be applied to other cancers for which germline testing is recommended.
© 2021 AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic testing; Guideline adherence; Pancreatic neoplasms; Precision medicine; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34506673      PMCID: PMC8571767          DOI: 10.1002/onco.13968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  24 in total

1.  Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States.

Authors:  Lola Rahib; Benjamin D Smith; Rhonda Aizenberg; Allison B Rosenzweig; Julie M Fleshman; Lynn M Matrisian
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Cancer Statistics, 2021.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Hannah E Fuchs; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  FDA Approval Summary: Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Microsatellite Instability-High Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Leigh Marcus; Steven J Lemery; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2019.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; Mokenge P Malafa; E Gabriela Chiorean; Brian Czito; Courtney Scaife; Amol K Narang; Christos Fountzilas; Brian M Wolpin; Mahmoud Al-Hawary; Horacio Asbun; Stephen W Behrman; Al B Benson; Ellen Binder; Dana B Cardin; Charles Cha; Vincent Chung; Mary Dillhoff; Efrat Dotan; Cristina R Ferrone; George Fisher; Jeffrey Hardacre; William G Hawkins; Andrew H Ko; Noelle LoConte; Andrew M Lowy; Cassadie Moravek; Eric K Nakakura; Eileen M O'Reilly; Jorge Obando; Sushanth Reddy; Sarah Thayer; Robert A Wolff; Jennifer L Burns; Griselda Zuccarino-Catania
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Evaluating Susceptibility to Pancreatic Cancer: ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion.

Authors:  Elena M Stoffel; Shannon E McKernin; Randall Brand; Marcia Canto; Michael Goggins; Cassadie Moravek; Arun Nagarajan; Gloria M Petersen; Diane M Simeone; Matthew Yurgelun; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Implementing Systematic Genetic Counseling and Multigene Germline Testing for Individuals With Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Anu Chittenden; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Chinedu Ukaegbu; Meghan Underhill-Blazey; Shraddha Gaonkar; Hajime Uno; Lauren K Brais; Kimberly Perez; Brian M Wolpin; Sapna Syngal; Matthew B Yurgelun
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 7.  Disparities in Pancreatic Cancer Treatment and Outcomes.

Authors:  Marcus Noel; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2019-10-29

8.  Platinum response characteristics of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and a germline BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutation.

Authors:  Max M Wattenberg; Daniella Asch; Shun Yu; Peter J O'Dwyer; Susan M Domchek; Katherine L Nathanson; Mark A Rosen; Gregory L Beatty; Evan S Siegelman; Kim A Reiss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Building towards Precision Oncology for Pancreatic Cancer: Real-World Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Yifan Wang; Anna Lakoma; George Zogopoulos
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 10.  Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States.

Authors:  Valentina A Zavala; Paige M Bracci; John M Carethers; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Nicole B Coggins; Marcia R Cruz-Correa; Melissa Davis; Adam J de Smith; Julie Dutil; Jane C Figueiredo; Rena Fox; Kristi D Graves; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Andrea Llera; Susan L Neuhausen; Lisa Newman; Tung Nguyen; Julie R Palmer; Nynikka R Palmer; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Sorbarikor Piawah; Erik J Rodriquez; María Carolina Sanabria-Salas; Stephanie L Schmit; Silvia J Serrano-Gomez; Mariana C Stern; Jeffrey Weitzel; Jun J Yang; Jovanny Zabaleta; Elad Ziv; Laura Fejerman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 9.075

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mainstreaming germline genetic testing for patients with pancreatic cancer increases uptake.

Authors:  Mitchell L Ramsey; Jewel Tomlinson; Rachel Pearlman; Laith Abushahin; Amber Aeilts; Hui-Zi Chen; Yan Chen; Ashley Compton; Rifat Elkhatib; Levi Geiger; John Hays; Joanne Jeter; Ning Jin; Pannaga Malalur; Sameek Roychowdhury; Jessica Ruple; Jennifer Prebish; Peter P Stanich; Heather Hampel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.446

2.  Integration of Universal Germline Genetic Testing for All New Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Julie O Culver; Yael Freiberg; Charité Ricker; Jacob G Comeaux; Emmeline Y Chang; Victoria Banerjee; Duveen Sturgeon; Ilana Solomon; Josie Kagey; Mariana G Dobre; Joseph Carey; Azadeh Carr; Stephanie Cho; Janice Lu; Irene M Kang; Ketan Patel; Alicia Terando; Jason C Ye; Ming Li; Caryn Lerman; Darcy Spicer; Maria Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.339

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.