Takashi Juri1, Koichi Suehiro2, Aya Kimura1, Akira Mukai1, Katsuaki Tanaka1, Tokuhiro Yamada1, Takashi Mori1, Kiyonobu Nishikawa1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-5-7 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8586, Japan. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-5-7 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8586, Japan. suehirokoichi@yahoo.co.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the ClearSight™ system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) for reducing the incidence of hypotension compared with the traditional oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. METHODS:Forty patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (Control and ClearSight groups). All patients received spinal anesthesia using 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (11.5 mg) and fentanyl (10 µg). Blood pressure was managed with the same protocol using the ClearSight™ system (ClearSight group) and oscillometric blood pressure monitoring (Control group). Furthermore, we compared the accuracy of the ClearSight™ system with the traditional oscillometric monitoring for blood pressure measurement using Bland-Altman, four-quadrant plot, and polar plot analyses. RESULTS: The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the ClearSight group from induction to delivery (45% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and to the end of surgery (50% vs. 20%, p = 0.049). Intraoperative nausea occurred more frequently in the Control group (45% vs. 10%, p = 0.012). The ClearSight™ system demonstrated acceptable accuracy with a bias of - 4.3 ± 11.7 mmHg throughout the procedure. Four-quadrant analysis revealed an excellent trending ability of the ClearSight™ system with a concordance rate of approximately 95%. In the polar plot analysis, the angular bias and concordance rate were - 13.5° ± 19.0° and 76.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and trending ability of the ClearSight™ system for blood pressure measurement was clinically acceptable in cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, leading to reductions in maternal hypotension and nausea.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the ClearSight™ system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) for reducing the incidence of hypotension compared with the traditional oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (Control and ClearSight groups). All patients received spinal anesthesia using 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (11.5 mg) and fentanyl (10 µg). Blood pressure was managed with the same protocol using the ClearSight™ system (ClearSight group) and oscillometric blood pressure monitoring (Control group). Furthermore, we compared the accuracy of the ClearSight™ system with the traditional oscillometric monitoring for blood pressure measurement using Bland-Altman, four-quadrant plot, and polar plot analyses. RESULTS: The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the ClearSight group from induction to delivery (45% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and to the end of surgery (50% vs. 20%, p = 0.049). Intraoperative nausea occurred more frequently in the Control group (45% vs. 10%, p = 0.012). The ClearSight™ system demonstrated acceptable accuracy with a bias of - 4.3 ± 11.7 mmHg throughout the procedure. Four-quadrant analysis revealed an excellent trending ability of the ClearSight™ system with a concordance rate of approximately 95%. In the polar plot analysis, the angular bias and concordance rate were - 13.5° ± 19.0° and 76.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and trending ability of the ClearSight™ system for blood pressure measurement was clinically acceptable in cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, leading to reductions in maternal hypotension and nausea.
Authors: S M Kinsella; B Carvalho; R A Dyer; R Fernando; N McDonnell; F J Mercier; A Palanisamy; A T H Sia; M Van de Velde; A Vercueil Journal: Anaesthesia Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 6.955
Authors: Philipp Helmer; Daniel Helf; Michael Sammeth; Bernd Winkler; Sebastian Hottenrott; Patrick Meybohm; Peter Kranke Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 4.964