| Literature DB >> 30260964 |
Neelam Kumari1,2, Joanna Cher1, Edwin Chua2, Haslina Hamzah2, Tien Yin Wong2,3, Carol Y Cheung2,4.
Abstract
To evaluate the association between serum carotenoids and quantitative measures of retinal vasculature in elderly Singapore Chinese subjects. The following details were collected in 128 healthy subjects: sociodemographics, lifestyle information, medical and drug history, and anthropometric measurements. Serum concentrations of carotenoids were estimated in fasting venous blood using high performance liquid chromatography. Retinal vascular parameters were quantitatively measured from retinal photographs using a computer-assisted program (Singapore I Vessel Assessment). The mean age of the population was 54.1 years (range 40 to 81 years). In multiple linear regression analysis, per SD decrease in retinal arteriolar caliber [β = 0.045 (0.003 to 0.086), p = 0.036], per SD increase in retinal venular caliber [β = -0.045 (-0.086 to -0.003), p = 0.036] and per SD increase in arteriolar branching angle [β = -0.039 (-0.072 to -0.006), p = 0.021] were associated with decreased serum lutein. Per SD increase in retinal venular tortuosity [β = -0.0075 (-0.0145 to -0.0004), p = 0.039] and per SD increase in arteriolar branching angle (β = -0.0073 [-0.0142 to -0.0059], p = 0.041) were associated with decreased serum zeaxanthin. None of the other carotenoids demonstrated meaningful relationship with quantitative measures of retinal vasculature. Lower levels of lutein and zeaxanthin demonstrated significant relationship with adverse quantitative measures of retinal vasculature in elderly healthy subjects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30260964 PMCID: PMC6160008 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Measurement of retinal vascular calibre using color fundus photographs.
SIVA software automatically identified and traced the retinal vessels (arteries and veins) on the digital colour fundus photographs. To further ascertain the accuracy of the automated vessel tracing generated by the software, trained graders examined the traced vessels and made manual corrections as necessary. Central retinal arteriolar and vascular caliber were summarized as CRAE and CRVE, respectively based on the revised Knudtson–Parr–Hubbard Formula.
Fig 2Measurement of retinal branching angles and vascular tortuosity using color fundus photographs.
For measurement of retinal branching angle, the lines denoting the direction of the branches were produced by SIVA software that tracked down each vessel in a specified area (defined as the region from 0.5 to 2 disc diameters away from the disc margin). Then the angle subtended by the daughter branches was automatically calculated by the software using the cosine rule of the angle at the bifurcation of the vessels. For assessment of retinal vascular tortuosity, the centerline of the vessel was automatically traced by the SIVA software. The retinal vascular tortuosity was derived from the integral of the curvature square along the path of the vessel, normalized by the total path length measured in a specified area (defined as the region from 0.5 to 2 disc diameters away from the disc margin). A straight vessel has lower tortuosity value while a tortuous vessel has a higher tortuosity value.
Demographic characteristics of study population stratified according to gender.
| Male (n = 51) | Female (n = 77) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | p value | |
| 55.61 | 7.49 | 53.17 | 7.25 | 0.068 | |
| 23.91 | 3.53 | 22.77 | 3.40 | 0.070 | |
| 5.34 | 0.91 | 5.65 | 0.84 | 0.059 | |
| 1.61 | 0.88 | 1.20 | 0.56 | ||
| 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.88 | 0.44 | ||
| 3.55 | 1.03 | 3.70 | 0.77 | 0.359 | |
| 3.87 | 1.20 | 3.14 | 0.73 | ||
| 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.668 | |
| 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.068 | 0.03 | ||
HDL: High density lipoproteins; LDL: Low density lipoproteins; C: Cholesterol; L: Lutein; Z: Zeaxanthin
Relationship between retinal vascular parameters and serum lutein and zeaxanthin.
| Retinal vascular parameters | Serum Lutein | Serum Zeaxanthin | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (per SD increase) | Mean | SD | β | 95% CI | P value | β | 95% CI | P value | ||
| Arteriolar Caliber | 117.5 | 9.5 | 0.003 | 0.086 | 0.0001 | -0.0087 | 0.0090 | 0.977 | ||
| Venular Caliber | 166.5 | 12.3 | -0.086 | -0.003 | 0.0044 | -0.0044 | 0.0132 | 0.323 | ||
| Arteriolar Tortousity | 0.944 (x10^4) | 0.147 (x10^4) | 0.009 | -0.026 | 0.043 | 0.618 | -0.0036 | -0.0108 | 0.0036 | 0.326 |
| Venular Tortousity | 1.18 (x10^4) | 0.183 (x10^4) | -0.026 | -0.061 | 0.008 | 0.126 | -0.0145 | -0.0004 | ||
| Arteriolar Fractal Dimension | 1.244 | 0.046 | 0.018 | -0.017 | 0.054 | 0.313 | -0.0020 | -0.0095 | 0.0054 | 0.589 |
| Venular Fractal Dimension | 1.238 | 0.049 | 0.003 | -0.032 | 0.039 | 0.858 | -0.0044 | -0.0117 | 0.0029 | 0.239 |
| Arteriolar Branching Angle | 72.98 | 11.31 | -0.072 | -0.006 | -0.0142 | -0.0003 | ||||
| Venular Branching Angle | 77.30 | 10.18 | -0.011 | -0.045 | 0.023 | 0.529 | -0.0013 | -0.0084 | 0.0059 | 0.721 |
Multiple linear regression models adjusted for age, gender, current smoking, body mass index, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides
Relationship between retinal vascular parameters and other serum carotenoids.
| CALIBER | TORTOUSITY | FRACTAL DIMENSION | BRANCHING ANGLE | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arteriolar | Venular | Arteriolar | Venular | Arteriolar | Venular | Arteriolar | Venular | |
| β Value | 0.043 | 0.059* | 0.006* | 0.023 | 0.023* | 0.015* | 0.008* | 0.012* |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.002 to 0.083 | 0.099* to 0.019* | 0.040* to 0.027 | 0.011* to 0.056 | 0.057* to 0.012 | 0.050* to 0.019 | 0.041* to 0.025 | 0.045* to 0.022 |
| P value | 0.718 | 0.180 | 0.199 | 0.377 | 0.648 | 0.491 | ||
| β Value | 0.002* | 0.002 | 0.005* | 0.003* | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.000* |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.008* to 0.004 | 0.004* to 0.009 | 0.010* to 0.000 | 0.008* to 0.002 | 0.002* to 0.009 | 0.003* to 0.007 | 0.003* to 0.007 | 0.005* to 0.005 |
| P value | 0.517 | 0.440 | 0.230 | 0.169 | 0.400 | 0.340 | 0.986 | |
| β Value | 0.031* | 0.006 | 0.022* | 0.007* | 0.019 | 0.029 | 0.006* | 0.017* |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.081* to 0.019 | 0.043* to 0.056 | 0.063* to 0.018 | 0.048* to 0.033 | 0.023* to 0.061 | 0.012* to 0.070 | 0.046* to 0.033 | 0.057* to 0.023 |
| P value | 0.221 | 0.799 | 0.269 | 0.723 | 0.377 | 0.162 | 0.757 | 0.401 |
| β Value | 0.005 | 0.015* | 0.003* | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.003* | 0.000 |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.007* to 0.018 | 0.028* to 0.003* | 0.013* to 0.007 | 0.009* to 0.011 | 0.003* to 0.018 | 0.003* to 0.018 | 0.013* to 0.007 | 0.011* to 0.010 |
| P value | 0.420 | 0.535 | 0.850 | 0.175 | 0.182 | 0.547 | 0.950 | |
| β Value | 0.004* | 0.060* | 0.022* | 0.005 | 0.024 | 0.26 | 0.024* | 0.047* |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.080* to 0.071 | 0.135* to 0.015 | 0.083* to 0.040 | 0.057* to 0.067 | 0.041* to 0.088 | 0.038* to 0.089 | 0.084* to 0.037 | 0.108* to 0.014 |
| P value | 0.911 | 0.118 | 0.486 | 0.879 | 0.469 | 0.424 | 0.441 | 0.132 |
| β Value | 0.003* | 0.008 | 0.005* | 0.004* | 0.004* | 0.005* | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.013* to 0.007 | 0.002* to 0.019 | 0.013* to 0.003 | 0.012* to 0.004 | 0.012* to 0.005 | 0.014* to 0.003 | 0.005* to 0.011 | 0.005* to 0.012 |
| P value | 0.544 | 0.099 | 0.201 | 0.311 | 0.409 | 0.231 | 0.402 | 0.396 |
| β Value | 0.276* | 0.556 | 0.020* | 0.356* | 0.251* | 0.273* | 0.046 | 0.649* |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.781* to 0.230 | 0.051 to 1.062 | 0.431* to 0.395 | 0.766* to 0.055 | 0.682* to 0.179 | 0.698* to 0.152 | 0.454* to 0.361 | 1.046* to 0.252* |
| P value | 0.282 | 0.926 | 0.089 | 0.250 | 0.205 | 0.822 | ||
| β Value | 0.003* | 0.008 | 0.001* | 0.008* | 0.000 | 0.002* | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.011* to 0.005 | 0.001* to 0.016 | 0.008* to 0.005 | 0.014* to 0.001* | 0.007* to 0.007 | 0.009* to 0.005 | 0.003* to 0.010 | 0.007* to 0.007 |
| P value | 0.474 | 0.069 | 0.686 | 0.972 | 0.597 | 0.291 | 0.976 | |
| β Value | 0.010* | 0.019 | 0.037* | 0.028* | 0.000 | 0.026* | 0.023* | 0.000 |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.060* to 0.040 | 0.031* to 0.068 | 0.076* to 0.003 | 0.068* to 0.012 | 0.042* to 0.042 | 0.067* to 0.015 | 0.062* to 0.016 | 0.040* to 0.041 |
| P value | 0.699 | 0.463 | 0.071 | 0.171 | 0.991 | 0.210 | 0.250 | 0.986 |
| β Value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001* | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.002* to 0.001 | 0.002* to 0.002 | 0.001* to 0.002 | 0.002* to 0.001 | 0.002* to 0.001 | 0.002* to 0.001 | 0.001* to 0.001 | 0.002* to 0.001 |
| P value | 0.802 | 0.925 | 0.434 | 0.595 | 0.709 | 0.425 | 0.741 | 0.729 |
| β Value | 0.001* | 0.013* | 0.010 | 0.006 | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.007* |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.0118 to 0.010 | 0.023* to 0.002* | 0.001 to 0.019 | 0.003* to 0.015 | 0.000 to 0.018 | 0.000 to 0.018 | 0.008* to 0.010 | 0.016* to 0.002 |
| P value | 0.902 | 0.170 | 0.061 | 0.058 | 0.791 | 0.112 | ||
| β Value | 0.000 | 0.001* | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001* |
| 95% Confidence interval | 0.002* to 0.002 | 0.003* to 0.001 | 0.001* to 0.002 | 0.001* to 0.003 | 0.001* to 0.002 | 0.001* to 0.002 | 0.002* to 0.002 | 0.003* to 0.001 |
| P value | 0.861 | 0.364 | 0.669 | 0.383 | 0.700 | 0.652 | 0.891 | 0.234 |
Multiple linear regression models adjusted for age, gender, current smoking, body mass index, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides*Negative correlation